{"title":"Socioeconomic differences in the intensity of end-of-life care among patients with cancer: a population-based study in the Lazio region, Italy.","authors":"Arianna Bellini, Alessandro Cesare Rosa, Michela Servadio, Paola Michelozzi, Antonio Addis, Valeria Belleudi","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckag148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The importance of assessing end-of-life (EoL) care has grown due to increased life expectancy and chronic disease prevalence. Despite awareness of holistic care, cancer patients often receive aggressive treatments that may reflect disparities influenced by socioeconomic factors. This study investigates EoL care among cancer patients in Italy, focusing on the impact of socioeconomic position (SEP). A retrospective observational study was conducted using Italian health databases, focusing on cancer patients aged 35 years and older who died between 2015 and 2019 in Lazio, Italy. SEP was assessed using educational attainment and a composite deprivation indicator at the census-section level. EoL care intensity was measured using hospitalization rates, emergency department visits, medication use, and place of death. Logistic regression models [OR (95% CI)] were used to explore socioeconomic associations with care intensity. The study included 84 936 subjects, predominantly aged over 75, with lung, colorectal, and breast cancers being the most common. During the last month of life, individuals with middle to higher educational levels (upper-middle, university degrees) had increased risks of hospitalization (OR 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.10; OR 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03-1.15), anti-neoplastic therapies (OR 1.29; 95% CI: 1.21-1.38; OR 1.48; 95% CI: 1.36-1.61), and in-hospital death (OR 1.08; 95% CI: 1.03-1.12; OR 1.16; 95% CI: 1.10-1.23) and lower risks of ED admissions (OR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.87-0.94; OR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.71-0.80) and opioid therapy (OR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.86-0.94; OR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.82-0.92). Similar results were observed when using the area-based SEP indicator. Socioeconomic differences influence EoL care pathways for patients with cancer in Italy. These findings suggest complex interactions between socioeconomic factors and care preferences, highlighting the need for tailored and equitable EoL care strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":"36 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13479746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The importance of assessing end-of-life (EoL) care has grown due to increased life expectancy and chronic disease prevalence. Despite awareness of holistic care, cancer patients often receive aggressive treatments that may reflect disparities influenced by socioeconomic factors. This study investigates EoL care among cancer patients in Italy, focusing on the impact of socioeconomic position (SEP). A retrospective observational study was conducted using Italian health databases, focusing on cancer patients aged 35 years and older who died between 2015 and 2019 in Lazio, Italy. SEP was assessed using educational attainment and a composite deprivation indicator at the census-section level. EoL care intensity was measured using hospitalization rates, emergency department visits, medication use, and place of death. Logistic regression models [OR (95% CI)] were used to explore socioeconomic associations with care intensity. The study included 84 936 subjects, predominantly aged over 75, with lung, colorectal, and breast cancers being the most common. During the last month of life, individuals with middle to higher educational levels (upper-middle, university degrees) had increased risks of hospitalization (OR 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.10; OR 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03-1.15), anti-neoplastic therapies (OR 1.29; 95% CI: 1.21-1.38; OR 1.48; 95% CI: 1.36-1.61), and in-hospital death (OR 1.08; 95% CI: 1.03-1.12; OR 1.16; 95% CI: 1.10-1.23) and lower risks of ED admissions (OR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.87-0.94; OR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.71-0.80) and opioid therapy (OR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.86-0.94; OR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.82-0.92). Similar results were observed when using the area-based SEP indicator. Socioeconomic differences influence EoL care pathways for patients with cancer in Italy. These findings suggest complex interactions between socioeconomic factors and care preferences, highlighting the need for tailored and equitable EoL care strategies.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.