Analytical and clinical performance of a novel DiaRD CMV qPCR assay for cytomegalovirus DNA quantification: a comparative study with the artus CMV RG PCR kit.
Bengul Durmaz, Tuba Dal, Hande Toptan, Mehmet Koroglu, Rıza Durmaz
{"title":"Analytical and clinical performance of a novel DiaRD CMV qPCR assay for cytomegalovirus DNA quantification: a comparative study with the artus CMV RG PCR kit.","authors":"Bengul Durmaz, Tuba Dal, Hande Toptan, Mehmet Koroglu, Rıza Durmaz","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2026.2721430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of morbidity in transplant recipients and patients with hematological malignancies, requiring accurate viral load monitoring for clinical management. This study evaluated the performance of the novel DiaRD CMV qPCR assay compared with the reference artus CMV RG PCR Kit.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A total of 180 anonymized plasma samples, including 47 CMV-positive and 133 CMV-negative specimens, were retrospectively analyzed. Diagnostic accuracy, quantitative agreement, analytical specificity, and precision were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DiaRD assay correctly identified 45 of 47 positive samples, yielding a sensitivity of 95.7% and specificity of 96.2%, with an overall accuracy of 96.1%. Positive and negative predictive values were 90.0% and 98.5%, respectively. Quantitative analysis demonstrated strong correlation between assays (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.880, <i>r</i> = 0.938, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement, with a mean difference of -0.009 log<sub>10</sub> IU/mL (SD: 0.272). Among concordant positive samples, 40 showed differences of <0.5 log<sub>10</sub> IU/mL. No cross-reactivity was detected with other tested pathogens. Precision studies demonstrated coefficients of variation below 2% for Ct values and ≤6.81% for viral loads.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the DiaRD CMV qPCR assay demonstrated reliable analytical and diagnostic performance, supporting its suitability for routine CMV DNA quantification in clinical laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"851-861"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2026.2721430","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of morbidity in transplant recipients and patients with hematological malignancies, requiring accurate viral load monitoring for clinical management. This study evaluated the performance of the novel DiaRD CMV qPCR assay compared with the reference artus CMV RG PCR Kit.
Research design and methods: A total of 180 anonymized plasma samples, including 47 CMV-positive and 133 CMV-negative specimens, were retrospectively analyzed. Diagnostic accuracy, quantitative agreement, analytical specificity, and precision were assessed.
Results: The DiaRD assay correctly identified 45 of 47 positive samples, yielding a sensitivity of 95.7% and specificity of 96.2%, with an overall accuracy of 96.1%. Positive and negative predictive values were 90.0% and 98.5%, respectively. Quantitative analysis demonstrated strong correlation between assays (R2 = 0.880, r = 0.938, p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement, with a mean difference of -0.009 log10 IU/mL (SD: 0.272). Among concordant positive samples, 40 showed differences of <0.5 log10 IU/mL. No cross-reactivity was detected with other tested pathogens. Precision studies demonstrated coefficients of variation below 2% for Ct values and ≤6.81% for viral loads.
Conclusion: Overall, the DiaRD CMV qPCR assay demonstrated reliable analytical and diagnostic performance, supporting its suitability for routine CMV DNA quantification in clinical laboratories.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting.
Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy.
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.