Analytical and clinical performance of a novel DiaRD CMV qPCR assay for cytomegalovirus DNA quantification: a comparative study with the artus CMV RG PCR kit.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Bengul Durmaz, Tuba Dal, Hande Toptan, Mehmet Koroglu, Rıza Durmaz
{"title":"Analytical and clinical performance of a novel DiaRD CMV qPCR assay for cytomegalovirus DNA quantification: a comparative study with the artus CMV RG PCR kit.","authors":"Bengul Durmaz, Tuba Dal, Hande Toptan, Mehmet Koroglu, Rıza Durmaz","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2026.2721430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of morbidity in transplant recipients and patients with hematological malignancies, requiring accurate viral load monitoring for clinical management. This study evaluated the performance of the novel DiaRD CMV qPCR assay compared with the reference artus CMV RG PCR Kit.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A total of 180 anonymized plasma samples, including 47 CMV-positive and 133 CMV-negative specimens, were retrospectively analyzed. Diagnostic accuracy, quantitative agreement, analytical specificity, and precision were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DiaRD assay correctly identified 45 of 47 positive samples, yielding a sensitivity of 95.7% and specificity of 96.2%, with an overall accuracy of 96.1%. Positive and negative predictive values were 90.0% and 98.5%, respectively. Quantitative analysis demonstrated strong correlation between assays (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.880, <i>r</i> = 0.938, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement, with a mean difference of -0.009 log<sub>10</sub> IU/mL (SD: 0.272). Among concordant positive samples, 40 showed differences of <0.5 log<sub>10</sub> IU/mL. No cross-reactivity was detected with other tested pathogens. Precision studies demonstrated coefficients of variation below 2% for Ct values and ≤6.81% for viral loads.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the DiaRD CMV qPCR assay demonstrated reliable analytical and diagnostic performance, supporting its suitability for routine CMV DNA quantification in clinical laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"851-861"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2026.2721430","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of morbidity in transplant recipients and patients with hematological malignancies, requiring accurate viral load monitoring for clinical management. This study evaluated the performance of the novel DiaRD CMV qPCR assay compared with the reference artus CMV RG PCR Kit.

Research design and methods: A total of 180 anonymized plasma samples, including 47 CMV-positive and 133 CMV-negative specimens, were retrospectively analyzed. Diagnostic accuracy, quantitative agreement, analytical specificity, and precision were assessed.

Results: The DiaRD assay correctly identified 45 of 47 positive samples, yielding a sensitivity of 95.7% and specificity of 96.2%, with an overall accuracy of 96.1%. Positive and negative predictive values were 90.0% and 98.5%, respectively. Quantitative analysis demonstrated strong correlation between assays (R2 = 0.880, r = 0.938, p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement, with a mean difference of -0.009 log10 IU/mL (SD: 0.272). Among concordant positive samples, 40 showed differences of <0.5 log10 IU/mL. No cross-reactivity was detected with other tested pathogens. Precision studies demonstrated coefficients of variation below 2% for Ct values and ≤6.81% for viral loads.

Conclusion: Overall, the DiaRD CMV qPCR assay demonstrated reliable analytical and diagnostic performance, supporting its suitability for routine CMV DNA quantification in clinical laboratories.

用于巨细胞病毒DNA定量的新型DiaRD巨细胞病毒qPCR检测的分析和临床性能:与artus巨细胞病毒RG PCR试剂盒的比较研究
背景:巨细胞病毒(CMV)仍然是移植受者和血液系统恶性肿瘤患者发病的主要原因,需要准确的病毒载量监测来进行临床管理。本研究比较了新型DiaRD CMV qPCR检测与参考artus CMV RG PCR试剂盒的性能。研究设计与方法:回顾性分析180例匿名血浆标本,其中cmv阳性标本47例,cmv阴性标本133例。评估诊断准确性、定量一致性、分析特异性和精确性。结果:DiaRD法正确识别了47个阳性样本中的45个,敏感性为95.7%,特异性为96.2%,总体准确性为96.1%。阳性预测值为90.0%,阴性预测值为98.5%。定量分析结果表明,两组间相关性较强(R2 = 0.880, r = 0.938, p 10 IU/mL (SD: 0.272)。在一致性阳性样本中,有40份差异为10 IU/mL。未发现与其他被试病原体发生交叉反应。精度研究表明,Ct值的变异系数低于2%,病毒载量的变异系数≤6.81%。结论:总体而言,DiaRD CMV qPCR检测显示出可靠的分析和诊断性能,支持其在临床实验室常规CMV DNA定量的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting. Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书