Efficacy and safety of fenfluramine in Dravet syndrome: The impact of patient clinical characteristics.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2026-08-22 DOI:10.1002/epi4.70340
Rima Nabbout, Joseph Sullivan, Stéphane Auvin, J Helen Cross, Orrin Devinsky, Antonio Gil-Nagel, Renzo Guerrini, Kelly G Knupp, M Scott Perry, Rocío Sánchez-Carpintero, An-Sofie Schoonjans, Ingrid E Scheffer, Nicola Specchio, Adam Strzelczyk, James Wheless, Elaine C Wirrell, Diego Morita, Patrick Healy, Mélanie Langlois, Amélie Lothe, Lieven Lagae
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of fenfluramine in Dravet syndrome: The impact of patient clinical characteristics.","authors":"Rima Nabbout, Joseph Sullivan, Stéphane Auvin, J Helen Cross, Orrin Devinsky, Antonio Gil-Nagel, Renzo Guerrini, Kelly G Knupp, M Scott Perry, Rocío Sánchez-Carpintero, An-Sofie Schoonjans, Ingrid E Scheffer, Nicola Specchio, Adam Strzelczyk, James Wheless, Elaine C Wirrell, Diego Morita, Patrick Healy, Mélanie Langlois, Amélie Lothe, Lieven Lagae","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of fenfluramine in patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) stratified by age, number of previously attempted antiseizure medications (ASMs), and SCN1A pathogenic variant status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this post hoc analysis, data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with DS (2-18 years) were pooled and stratified by age (<4; ≥4 years), number of previous ASMs (1-3; 4-6; ≥7), and SCN1A pathogenic variant status (SCN1A+; SCN1A-). Stratified groups were assessed and compared with the pooled placebo group (change in monthly convulsive seizure frequency [MCSF], longest convulsive seizure-free interval, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement [CGI-I] scale scores rated by parents/caregivers and investigators), and safety (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]: frequency, days to onset, and proportion resolved).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 348 patients included in the RCTs, 216 were randomized to fenfluramine (0.7 mg/kg/day, n = 88; 0.4 mg/kg/day [with stiripentol], n = 43; 0.2 mg/kg/day, n = 85) and 132 to placebo. Compared with placebo, fenfluramine treatment (all doses combined) resulted in greater MCSF reductions, greater increases in longest convulsive seizure-free intervals, and a higher proportion of parents/caregivers and investigators reporting clinically meaningful improvement (\"Much Improved\", \"Very Much Improved\") on CGI-I scores across all stratified groups. CGI-I scores were consistent across fenfluramine doses in most stratified groups, but patients with the fewest number of previous ASMs had the greatest frequency of clinically meaningful improvement on investigator-rated CGI-I scores. Safety outcomes were similar across all strata. Most TEAEs resolved by end-of-study.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Fenfluramine treatment was associated with improved seizure outcomes and global functioning compared with placebo regardless of age, number of previous ASMs, and SCN1A status in patients with DS. Fenfluramine was well-tolerated; no new safety signals were identified. Further studies with larger sample sizes (including adults) and a priori inferential analyses of stratified groups are warranted.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Patients with Dravet syndrome struggle with seizures and everyday life. In three studies, patients aged 2-18 years received fenfluramine or placebo (sugar pill). Fenfluramine lowered seizures without many side effects. Researchers combined results from these studies to see how fenfluramine worked in different patient groups based on age, number of previous medications, and a gene called SCN1A. They looked at seizure reduction and whether doctors felt patients had improved. In all groups, fenfluramine worked better than placebo, with similar side effects. Researchers believe fenfluramine helped these patients, but some groups were small, so these results need to be confirmed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13499604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.70340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of fenfluramine in patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) stratified by age, number of previously attempted antiseizure medications (ASMs), and SCN1A pathogenic variant status.

Methods: In this post hoc analysis, data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with DS (2-18 years) were pooled and stratified by age (<4; ≥4 years), number of previous ASMs (1-3; 4-6; ≥7), and SCN1A pathogenic variant status (SCN1A+; SCN1A-). Stratified groups were assessed and compared with the pooled placebo group (change in monthly convulsive seizure frequency [MCSF], longest convulsive seizure-free interval, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement [CGI-I] scale scores rated by parents/caregivers and investigators), and safety (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]: frequency, days to onset, and proportion resolved).

Results: Among 348 patients included in the RCTs, 216 were randomized to fenfluramine (0.7 mg/kg/day, n = 88; 0.4 mg/kg/day [with stiripentol], n = 43; 0.2 mg/kg/day, n = 85) and 132 to placebo. Compared with placebo, fenfluramine treatment (all doses combined) resulted in greater MCSF reductions, greater increases in longest convulsive seizure-free intervals, and a higher proportion of parents/caregivers and investigators reporting clinically meaningful improvement ("Much Improved", "Very Much Improved") on CGI-I scores across all stratified groups. CGI-I scores were consistent across fenfluramine doses in most stratified groups, but patients with the fewest number of previous ASMs had the greatest frequency of clinically meaningful improvement on investigator-rated CGI-I scores. Safety outcomes were similar across all strata. Most TEAEs resolved by end-of-study.

Significance: Fenfluramine treatment was associated with improved seizure outcomes and global functioning compared with placebo regardless of age, number of previous ASMs, and SCN1A status in patients with DS. Fenfluramine was well-tolerated; no new safety signals were identified. Further studies with larger sample sizes (including adults) and a priori inferential analyses of stratified groups are warranted.

Plain language summary: Patients with Dravet syndrome struggle with seizures and everyday life. In three studies, patients aged 2-18 years received fenfluramine or placebo (sugar pill). Fenfluramine lowered seizures without many side effects. Researchers combined results from these studies to see how fenfluramine worked in different patient groups based on age, number of previous medications, and a gene called SCN1A. They looked at seizure reduction and whether doctors felt patients had improved. In all groups, fenfluramine worked better than placebo, with similar side effects. Researchers believe fenfluramine helped these patients, but some groups were small, so these results need to be confirmed.

芬氟拉明治疗德拉韦综合征的疗效和安全性:患者临床特征的影响。
目的:评价芬氟拉明在按年龄、既往抗癫痫药物(asm)使用次数和SCN1A致病变异状态分层的Dravet综合征(DS)患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:在这项事后分析中,对来自3项随机对照试验(RCTs)的DS(2-18岁)患者的数据进行汇总并按年龄分层(结果:在纳入rct的348例患者中,216例随机分配到芬氟拉明组(0.7 mg/kg/天,n = 88; 0.4 mg/kg/天[与施替利戊醇一起],n = 43; 0.2 mg/kg/天,n = 85), 132例随机分配到安慰剂组。与安慰剂相比,芬氟拉明治疗(所有联合剂量)导致更大的MCSF降低,更长的抽搐无发作间隔时间增加,并且在所有分层组中,更高比例的父母/照顾者和研究人员报告CGI-I评分有临床意义的改善(“大大改善”,“非常改善”)。在大多数分层组中,不同芬氟拉明剂量的CGI-I评分是一致的,但先前asm次数最少的患者在研究者评定的CGI-I评分中有临床意义改善的频率最高。所有阶层的安全结果相似。大多数teae在学习结束时得到了解决。意义:与安慰剂相比,芬氟拉明治疗与癫痫发作结果和整体功能的改善有关,与年龄、既往痉挛次数和退行性痴呆患者的SCN1A状态无关。芬氟拉明耐受性良好;没有发现新的安全信号。进一步研究更大的样本量(包括成人)和分层群体的先验推理分析是有必要的。简单的语言总结:德拉韦综合征患者与癫痫发作和日常生活作斗争。在三项研究中,2-18岁的患者接受芬氟拉明或安慰剂(糖丸)。芬氟拉明减少癫痫发作,没有很多副作用。研究人员将这些研究的结果结合起来,看看芬氟拉明是如何在不同的患者群体中发挥作用的,这些患者群体基于年龄、既往药物的数量和一种名为SCN1A的基因。他们观察了癫痫发作的减少情况,以及医生是否觉得病人病情有所好转。在所有组中,芬氟拉明的效果都比安慰剂好,副作用相似。研究人员认为芬氟拉明对这些患者有帮助,但有些群体很小,所以这些结果需要得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书