The "Too-Few Elephant Problem": Quantitative Analysis of Historical Elephant Tree-Toppling Rates Across Africa.

IF 3.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosystems Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-20 DOI:10.1007/s10021-026-01089-5
Sally Archibald, Anya P Courtenay, Fezile Mtsetfwa, Domingos Fortunato P F da Silva, Katherine Bunney, Robert Guldemond, Penny Mograbi, Caitlin Ransom, Casey M Ryan, Norman Owen-Smith
{"title":"The \"Too-Few Elephant Problem\": Quantitative Analysis of Historical Elephant Tree-Toppling Rates Across Africa.","authors":"Sally Archibald, Anya P Courtenay, Fezile Mtsetfwa, Domingos Fortunato P F da Silva, Katherine Bunney, Robert Guldemond, Penny Mograbi, Caitlin Ransom, Casey M Ryan, Norman Owen-Smith","doi":"10.1007/s10021-026-01089-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elephants were a major driver of tree stem mortality in Africa, but their impacts are now spatially constrained and they no longer topple trees across the continent. Thus, most African landscapes lack a key ecological agent that helped maintain diversity and functioning. Even ecologists living in Africa fail to anticipate the rampant destruction of trees that can occur when elephants live in and move through landscapes. If we can build in a consensus on the degree of above-ground tree turnover that is inherent in different contexts, it would inform restoration projects and ecological definitions of degradation. We collated empirical data on treefall in ecosystems with and without elephants and predicted past tree loss spatially. The metrics used (%trees or #trees ha<sup>-1</sup>) reveal assumptions about the processes controlling elephant damage. On average elephants knock down 5.4 [IQR 3.0-8.3] % of the trees in an ecosystem per annum. Mapping this into places that no longer contain elephants reveals the above-ground biomass turnover that would have been the norm for millennia before elephants were widely exterminated. On average, this is ~ 1/3 of woody biomass production but at a local scale it can often exceed production. There is an urgent need for better theory on elephant tree interactions, and restoration projects should embrace the rapid turnover dynamics these ecosystems evolved with.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10021-026-01089-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":11406,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystems","volume":"29 5","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13493457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-026-01089-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elephants were a major driver of tree stem mortality in Africa, but their impacts are now spatially constrained and they no longer topple trees across the continent. Thus, most African landscapes lack a key ecological agent that helped maintain diversity and functioning. Even ecologists living in Africa fail to anticipate the rampant destruction of trees that can occur when elephants live in and move through landscapes. If we can build in a consensus on the degree of above-ground tree turnover that is inherent in different contexts, it would inform restoration projects and ecological definitions of degradation. We collated empirical data on treefall in ecosystems with and without elephants and predicted past tree loss spatially. The metrics used (%trees or #trees ha-1) reveal assumptions about the processes controlling elephant damage. On average elephants knock down 5.4 [IQR 3.0-8.3] % of the trees in an ecosystem per annum. Mapping this into places that no longer contain elephants reveals the above-ground biomass turnover that would have been the norm for millennia before elephants were widely exterminated. On average, this is ~ 1/3 of woody biomass production but at a local scale it can often exceed production. There is an urgent need for better theory on elephant tree interactions, and restoration projects should embrace the rapid turnover dynamics these ecosystems evolved with.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10021-026-01089-5.

“大象太少的问题”:非洲历史上大象倒树率的定量分析。
大象是导致非洲树干死亡的主要原因,但它们的影响现在在空间上受到限制,它们不再推倒整个非洲大陆的树木。因此,大多数非洲景观缺乏有助于维持多样性和功能的关键生态因子。即使是生活在非洲的生态学家也没有预料到大象在景观中生活和移动时可能发生的对树木的猖獗破坏。如果我们能够就不同环境下固有的地上树木更替程度达成共识,它将为恢复项目和退化的生态定义提供信息。我们整理了有大象和没有大象的生态系统中树木砍伐的经验数据,并对过去的树木损失进行了空间预测。使用的度量(%树或#树ha-1)揭示了对控制大象伤害过程的假设。大象平均每年砍伐生态系统中5.4 %的树木。将其映射到不再有大象的地方,揭示了在大象被广泛灭绝之前的几千年里,地上生物量的更替是常态。平均而言,这约占木质生物质产量的1/3,但在当地规模上,它往往会超过产量。目前迫切需要更好的理论来解释象树之间的相互作用,恢复项目应考虑到这些生态系统的快速更替动态。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s10021-026-01089-5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosystems
Ecosystems 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: The study and management of ecosystems represent the most dynamic field of contemporary ecology. Ecosystem research bridges fundamental ecology and environmental ecology and environmental problem-solving, and spans boundaries of scale, discipline and perspective. Ecosystems features a distinguished team of editors-in-chief and an outstanding international editorial board, and is seen worldwide as a vital home for publishing significant research as well as editorials, mini-reviews and special features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书