Long-acting reversible contraception, condom use and sexually transmitted infections in developing countries: a multi-country serial cross-sectional analysis using demographic and health surveys.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nan Zhang, Luyao Xie, Yingxuan Wang, Zihao Guo, Cheng Su, Qiaoge Chi, Salihu S Musa, Kailu Wang, Kai Wang, Ka Chun Chong, Nafiu Hussaini, Yuantao Hao, Abdulrazaq G Habib, Yang Ge, Shi Zhao
{"title":"Long-acting reversible contraception, condom use and sexually transmitted infections in developing countries: a multi-country serial cross-sectional analysis using demographic and health surveys.","authors":"Nan Zhang, Luyao Xie, Yingxuan Wang, Zihao Guo, Cheng Su, Qiaoge Chi, Salihu S Musa, Kailu Wang, Kai Wang, Ka Chun Chong, Nafiu Hussaini, Yuantao Hao, Abdulrazaq G Habib, Yang Ge, Shi Zhao","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-022849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are major public health issues in developing countries. While long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) effectively prevents unintended pregnancy, there is limited evidence from large multinational studies on its association with condom use and STI-related outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the association between LARC use, condom use and STIs among women in developing countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This serial cross-sectional study extracted data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), a series of nationally representative household surveys conducted in developing countries. The analysis included women aged 15 to 49 years, with data on contraceptive methods and demographics. Generalised linear mixed effect models (GLMMs) were used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for condom use and self-reported STI-related outcomes, comparing LARC users with both non-LARC users and oral contraceptive users. Subgroup analyses were conducted at the individual level and at the country level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 2 171 884 women across 31 countries were analysed. Overall, the prevalence of self-reported STI-related outcomes was 7.4%, 3.9% of participants used LARC, and 7.5% of participants reported consistent condom use. LARC users were significantly less likely to use condoms compared with non-LARC users (aPR=0.40, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.53) and compared with oral contraceptive users (aPR=0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.78). LARC use was associated with a higher prevalence of STI-related outcomes compared with non-LARC users (aPR=1.19, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.28) and compared with oral contraceptives users (aPR=1.14, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.24). Associations were stronger in low-Human Development Index (HDI) countries, especially among younger women (15-19 years), but were not significant in high-HDI countries. Country-level heterogeneity was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LARC use is associated with reduced condom use and higher self-reported STI prevalence, particularly among younger women and in lower HDI developing countries. These findings support integrating STI prevention into LARC services and promoting dual-method use to prevent both unintended pregnancies and STIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"11 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13504946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-022849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are major public health issues in developing countries. While long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) effectively prevents unintended pregnancy, there is limited evidence from large multinational studies on its association with condom use and STI-related outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the association between LARC use, condom use and STIs among women in developing countries.

Methods: This serial cross-sectional study extracted data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), a series of nationally representative household surveys conducted in developing countries. The analysis included women aged 15 to 49 years, with data on contraceptive methods and demographics. Generalised linear mixed effect models (GLMMs) were used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for condom use and self-reported STI-related outcomes, comparing LARC users with both non-LARC users and oral contraceptive users. Subgroup analyses were conducted at the individual level and at the country level.

Results: Data from 2 171 884 women across 31 countries were analysed. Overall, the prevalence of self-reported STI-related outcomes was 7.4%, 3.9% of participants used LARC, and 7.5% of participants reported consistent condom use. LARC users were significantly less likely to use condoms compared with non-LARC users (aPR=0.40, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.53) and compared with oral contraceptive users (aPR=0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.78). LARC use was associated with a higher prevalence of STI-related outcomes compared with non-LARC users (aPR=1.19, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.28) and compared with oral contraceptives users (aPR=1.14, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.24). Associations were stronger in low-Human Development Index (HDI) countries, especially among younger women (15-19 years), but were not significant in high-HDI countries. Country-level heterogeneity was observed.

Conclusions: LARC use is associated with reduced condom use and higher self-reported STI prevalence, particularly among younger women and in lower HDI developing countries. These findings support integrating STI prevention into LARC services and promoting dual-method use to prevent both unintended pregnancies and STIs.

发展中国家的长效可逆避孕、避孕套使用和性传播感染:利用人口和健康调查进行的多国连续横断面分析。
导言:意外怀孕和性传播感染是发展中国家的主要公共卫生问题。虽然长效可逆避孕(LARC)能有效预防意外怀孕,但大型跨国研究中关于其与避孕套使用和性传播感染相关结果之间关系的证据有限。这项研究旨在调查发展中国家妇女中LARC使用、避孕套使用和性传播感染之间的关系。方法:本系列横断面研究从人口与健康调查(DHS)中提取数据,这是在发展中国家进行的一系列具有全国代表性的家庭调查。该研究分析了15至49岁的女性,并提供了避孕方法和人口统计数据。使用广义线性混合效应模型(glmm)来估计避孕套使用的调整患病率(aPRs)和自我报告的性传播感染相关结果,比较LARC使用者与非LARC使用者和口服避孕药使用者。在个人和国家一级进行了分组分析。结果:研究人员分析了来自31个国家的217884名女性的数据。总体而言,自我报告的性传播感染相关结果的患病率为7.4%,3.9%的参与者使用LARC, 7.5%的参与者报告持续使用安全套。与非LARC使用者相比,LARC使用者使用避孕套的可能性显著降低(aPR=0.40, 95% CI 0.30至0.53),与口服避孕药使用者相比(aPR=0.61, 95% CI 0.48至0.78)。与非LARC使用者(aPR=1.19, 95% CI 1.10至1.28)和口服避孕药使用者(aPR=1.14, 95% CI 1.05至1.24)相比,LARC使用者与更高的性传播感染相关结局发生率相关。在低人类发展指数(HDI)国家,尤其是在年轻女性(15-19岁)中,相关性更强,但在高人类发展指数国家则不显著。观察到国家层面的异质性。结论:LARC使用与安全套使用减少和性传播感染自我报告患病率升高有关,特别是在年轻女性和低HDI发展中国家。这些发现支持将性传播感染预防纳入LARC服务,并促进双重方法使用,以预防意外怀孕和性传播感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书