Benzodiazepine prescribing at discharge from adult and older persons psychiatric inpatient units: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Justin McMahon, John McMaster, David Maletsky, Hesitha Abeysundera
{"title":"Benzodiazepine prescribing at discharge from adult and older persons psychiatric inpatient units: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Justin McMahon, John McMaster, David Maletsky, Hesitha Abeysundera","doi":"10.1177/10398562261474431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivePsychiatric inpatient discharge is a prescribing transition at which benzodiazepines initiated for short-term symptom control may unintentionally continue beyond discharge. Existing guidance is limited for prescribing decisions. We aimed to estimate benzodiazepine discharge prevalence from adult and older persons psychiatric inpatient units and examine between-study heterogeneity.MethodsWe searched five databases from inception to 31 December 2022, updated the search on 27 November 2025 (PROSPERO: CRD42022368986), and included studies reporting benzodiazepine prescribing at discharge from adult and older persons psychiatric inpatient units.ResultsTwenty-five studies contributed 28 cohorts and 15,517 discharge observations. Pooled discharge prevalence was 50% (95% CI: 37-62) in acute adult cohorts and 27% (95% CI: 18-38) in older persons cohorts, with substantial heterogeneity and very low certainty of evidence. Admission-to-discharge change was small and non-significant across 11 paired cohorts.ConclusionBenzodiazepine prescribing at psychiatric inpatient discharge was common and highly variable. Marked setting-level variation, lower prevalence in older persons settings, and divergent admission-to-discharge trajectories suggest modifiable systemic influences beyond patient-level factors. Although continuation may support community transition after inpatient stabilisation, its downstream impact remains unclear because post-discharge patient-centred outcomes were not reported. Future research should clarify the risk-benefit profile of continuation to inform transition-specific prescribing guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"10398562261474431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562261474431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivePsychiatric inpatient discharge is a prescribing transition at which benzodiazepines initiated for short-term symptom control may unintentionally continue beyond discharge. Existing guidance is limited for prescribing decisions. We aimed to estimate benzodiazepine discharge prevalence from adult and older persons psychiatric inpatient units and examine between-study heterogeneity.MethodsWe searched five databases from inception to 31 December 2022, updated the search on 27 November 2025 (PROSPERO: CRD42022368986), and included studies reporting benzodiazepine prescribing at discharge from adult and older persons psychiatric inpatient units.ResultsTwenty-five studies contributed 28 cohorts and 15,517 discharge observations. Pooled discharge prevalence was 50% (95% CI: 37-62) in acute adult cohorts and 27% (95% CI: 18-38) in older persons cohorts, with substantial heterogeneity and very low certainty of evidence. Admission-to-discharge change was small and non-significant across 11 paired cohorts.ConclusionBenzodiazepine prescribing at psychiatric inpatient discharge was common and highly variable. Marked setting-level variation, lower prevalence in older persons settings, and divergent admission-to-discharge trajectories suggest modifiable systemic influences beyond patient-level factors. Although continuation may support community transition after inpatient stabilisation, its downstream impact remains unclear because post-discharge patient-centred outcomes were not reported. Future research should clarify the risk-benefit profile of continuation to inform transition-specific prescribing guidance.

成人和老年人精神科住院病房出院时苯二氮卓类药物处方:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:精神科住院患者出院是一个处方过渡时期,在此期间,为短期症状控制而开始使用苯二氮卓类药物可能在出院后无意中继续使用。现有的指导方针仅限于开处方的决定。我们的目的是估计成人和老年人精神科住院病人苯二氮卓类药物的出院率,并检查研究间异质性。方法:我们检索了从建立到2022年12月31日的5个数据库,并于2025年11月27日更新检索(PROSPERO: CRD42022368986),纳入了报告成人和老年人精神科住院病房出院时苯二氮卓类药物处方的研究。结果25项研究共纳入28个队列,15517例出院观察。急性成人队列的合并出院患病率为50% (95% CI: 37-62),老年人队列的合并出院患病率为27% (95% CI: 18-38),存在很大的异质性和非常低的证据确定性。在11个配对队列中,入院到出院的变化很小且不显著。结论精神科住院患者出院时苯二氮卓类药物处方较为普遍,且差异较大。显著的环境水平差异、老年人环境中较低的患病率以及不同的入院-出院轨迹表明,可改变的系统性影响超出了患者水平的因素。尽管继续治疗可能支持住院患者稳定后的社区过渡,但其下游影响尚不清楚,因为出院后以患者为中心的结果尚未报道。未来的研究应阐明继续用药的风险-收益概况,以便为过渡期特定的处方指导提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书