Evaluation of a novel strap fixation method for biomechanical testing of sheep Achilles tendons

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Onur Basci, Selahaddin Aydemir, Resit Bugra Husemoglu, Mustafa Çeltik
{"title":"Evaluation of a novel strap fixation method for biomechanical testing of sheep Achilles tendons","authors":"Onur Basci,&nbsp;Selahaddin Aydemir,&nbsp;Resit Bugra Husemoglu,&nbsp;Mustafa Çeltik","doi":"10.1007/s00402-026-06478-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Reliable fixation of tendon specimens is a major challenge in biomechanical testing, as slippage and tissue damage can reduce accuracy and reproducibility. Although various clamp- and suture-based fixation methods have been reported, there is still no widely accepted, practical, low-cost technique that preserves tendon integrity during testing. This study aimed to compare commonly used fixation techniques and to evaluate whether a novel strap-based fixation method provides a more stable and tissue-preserving alternative for biomechanical testing of sheep Achilles tendons.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty fresh-frozen cadaveric sheep Achilles tendons obtained from a local butcher were used, and the specimens were stored at − 20 °C until testing. After controlled thawing at room temperature, all tendons were repaired using the Bunnell suture technique with No. 0 Vicryl. Four different proximal fixation methods were evaluated: (1) sutured fixation with strap, (2) direct clamp fixation, (3) Kocher clamp fixation, and (4) Krackow suture fixation. All specimens were mounted on a universal testing machine and subjected to a load-to-failure protocol at a constant loading rate of 10 mm/s. Maximum force (N), displacement at failure (mm), and mechanical failure mechanisms were recorded for each sample. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney U tests for pairwise comparisons (p &lt; 0.0083).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The strap method demonstrated the highest numerical load-carrying capacity [114.58 N (73.59–135.00)] with relatively controlled displacement [16.96 mm (8.79–26.52)]. Its maximum load was significantly higher than that of the direct clamp and Kocher clamp methods; however, the difference compared with the Krackow suture method did not remain statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. Tendons fixed directly by clamp (Group 2) exhibited tissue damage due to clamp pressure and showed lower load capacity [75.41 N (58.28–110.78)] with greater displacement [28.01 mm (17.63–51.93)]. The Kocher clamp method (Group 3) provided the lowest mechanical strength, and most specimens slipped at the onset of loading [38.35 N (26.41–49.53); 15.55 mm (10.92–17.54)]. The Krackow suture method (Group 4) showed intermediate performance [82.95 N (65.62–148.50); 27.00 mm (19.49–30.75)].</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The strap fixation method provided stable fixation, no visible slippage, and the highest numerical load-to-failure values among the tested techniques. It was significantly stronger than the direct clamp and Kocher clamp methods; however, it was not statistically superior to the Krackow suture method after Bonferroni correction. The strap method may therefore be considered a practical and tissue-preserving alternative for further biomechanical tendon testing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"146 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13499759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-026-06478-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Reliable fixation of tendon specimens is a major challenge in biomechanical testing, as slippage and tissue damage can reduce accuracy and reproducibility. Although various clamp- and suture-based fixation methods have been reported, there is still no widely accepted, practical, low-cost technique that preserves tendon integrity during testing. This study aimed to compare commonly used fixation techniques and to evaluate whether a novel strap-based fixation method provides a more stable and tissue-preserving alternative for biomechanical testing of sheep Achilles tendons.

Methods

Forty fresh-frozen cadaveric sheep Achilles tendons obtained from a local butcher were used, and the specimens were stored at − 20 °C until testing. After controlled thawing at room temperature, all tendons were repaired using the Bunnell suture technique with No. 0 Vicryl. Four different proximal fixation methods were evaluated: (1) sutured fixation with strap, (2) direct clamp fixation, (3) Kocher clamp fixation, and (4) Krackow suture fixation. All specimens were mounted on a universal testing machine and subjected to a load-to-failure protocol at a constant loading rate of 10 mm/s. Maximum force (N), displacement at failure (mm), and mechanical failure mechanisms were recorded for each sample. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney U tests for pairwise comparisons (p < 0.0083).

Results

The strap method demonstrated the highest numerical load-carrying capacity [114.58 N (73.59–135.00)] with relatively controlled displacement [16.96 mm (8.79–26.52)]. Its maximum load was significantly higher than that of the direct clamp and Kocher clamp methods; however, the difference compared with the Krackow suture method did not remain statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. Tendons fixed directly by clamp (Group 2) exhibited tissue damage due to clamp pressure and showed lower load capacity [75.41 N (58.28–110.78)] with greater displacement [28.01 mm (17.63–51.93)]. The Kocher clamp method (Group 3) provided the lowest mechanical strength, and most specimens slipped at the onset of loading [38.35 N (26.41–49.53); 15.55 mm (10.92–17.54)]. The Krackow suture method (Group 4) showed intermediate performance [82.95 N (65.62–148.50); 27.00 mm (19.49–30.75)].

Conclusion

The strap fixation method provided stable fixation, no visible slippage, and the highest numerical load-to-failure values among the tested techniques. It was significantly stronger than the direct clamp and Kocher clamp methods; however, it was not statistically superior to the Krackow suture method after Bonferroni correction. The strap method may therefore be considered a practical and tissue-preserving alternative for further biomechanical tendon testing.

一种用于羊跟腱生物力学测试的新型带固定方法的评价。
背景:肌腱标本的可靠固定是生物力学测试的主要挑战,因为滑移和组织损伤会降低准确性和重复性。尽管已经报道了各种基于夹子和缝线的固定方法,但仍没有广泛接受的、实用的、低成本的技术来在测试期间保持肌腱的完整性。本研究旨在比较常用的固定技术,并评估一种新的基于绑带的固定方法是否为羊跟腱的生物力学测试提供了一种更稳定和保存组织的替代方法。方法:取材于当地肉店新鲜冷冻的死羊跟腱40只,- 20℃保存,待检测。在室温下控制解冻后,使用Bunnell缝合技术与0号Vicryl修复所有肌腱。评估四种不同的近端固定方法:(1)带式缝合固定,(2)直接钳固定,(3)Kocher钳固定,(4)Krackow缝合固定。所有试样均安装在万能试验机上,并以恒定的加载速率(10mm /s)进行加载至失效协议。记录每个样品的最大力(N)、破坏时的位移(mm)和机械破坏机制。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和bonferroni校正的Mann-Whitney U检验两两比较(p)对数据进行分析。结果:带式方法显示出最高的数值承载能力[114.58 N(73.59-135.00)]和相对可控的位移[16.96 mm(8.79-26.52)]。其最大载荷显著高于直接夹紧法和Kocher夹紧法;但经Bonferroni校正后,与Krackow缝合法比较,差异无统计学意义。直接用钳固定的肌腱(2组)由于钳压造成组织损伤,其承载能力较低[75.41 N(58.28-110.78)],位移较大[28.01 mm(17.63-51.93)]。Kocher夹紧法(组3)机械强度最低,大多数试件在加载开始时滑移[38.35 N (26.41-49.53)];15.55毫米(10.92-17.54)]。Krackow缝合法(第4组)表现为中等性能[82.95 N (65.62-148.50)];27.00毫米(19.49-30.75)]。结论:带式固定方法固定稳定,无明显滑移,在试验技术中具有最高的载荷失效数值。其强度明显高于直接钳和Kocher钳;然而,Bonferroni校正后的Krackow缝合法在统计学上并不优于Krackow缝合法。因此,对于进一步的生物力学肌腱测试,带法可以被认为是一种实用的、保存组织的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书