Temporal trends and social determinants of sepsis knowledge in Brazil: findings from three national cross-sectional surveys.

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Annals of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2026-07-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100128
Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo, Larissa Romeiro Pellozo, Josiane Francisca Ferreira, Juliana Lubarino Diniz de Souza, Thiago Lisboa, Rafael Barberena Moraes, Reinaldo Salomao, Tiago Mendonça Dos Santos, Regis Rosa, Daniela Carla de Souza
{"title":"Temporal trends and social determinants of sepsis knowledge in Brazil: findings from three national cross-sectional surveys.","authors":"Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo, Larissa Romeiro Pellozo, Josiane Francisca Ferreira, Juliana Lubarino Diniz de Souza, Thiago Lisboa, Rafael Barberena Moraes, Reinaldo Salomao, Tiago Mendonça Dos Santos, Regis Rosa, Daniela Carla de Souza","doi":"10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public awareness of sepsis is essential for early recognition of warning signs and timely healthcare seeking behavior, but data from resource-limited settings remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated sepsis knowledge in Brazil using cross-sectional surveys conducted in 2014, 2017, and 2026. Standardized questionnaires were administered through face-to-face interviews using random sampling stratified by age, sex, and geographic region. Adequate basic knowledge was defined as having heard the term sepsis and correctly identifying it as a severe host response to infection. In 2026, we additionally assessed knowledge of sepsis time-dependent nature and long-term disability after sepsis. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6,312 participants were interviewed (2014: n = 2,126; 2017: n = 2,100; 2026: n = 2,086). Adequate basic knowledge increased from 2.6% in 2014 to 5.8% in 2017 (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.63-3.16; p < 0.001) and 10.3% in 2026 (OR 3.45, 95% CI 2.54-4.75; p < 0.001). In 2026, 70.0% of participants acknowledged that earlier diagnosis and treatment improve survival. Awareness of long-term disabilities was lower (24.4%). Higher educational attainment was the strongest determinant of knowledge across all domains. Younger age, male sex, residence outside state capitals, and lower household income were independently associated with lower knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Public awareness of sepsis in Brazil has improved substantially over the past decade, suggesting a positive impact of national and international awareness initiatives. Nevertheless, important knowledge gaps persist, and awareness continues to be strongly influenced by socioeconomic factors, highlighting the need for continued efforts to improve sepsis awareness and promote equitable access to health information.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"16 ","pages":"100128"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13486371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100128","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Public awareness of sepsis is essential for early recognition of warning signs and timely healthcare seeking behavior, but data from resource-limited settings remain scarce.

Methods: We evaluated sepsis knowledge in Brazil using cross-sectional surveys conducted in 2014, 2017, and 2026. Standardized questionnaires were administered through face-to-face interviews using random sampling stratified by age, sex, and geographic region. Adequate basic knowledge was defined as having heard the term sepsis and correctly identifying it as a severe host response to infection. In 2026, we additionally assessed knowledge of sepsis time-dependent nature and long-term disability after sepsis. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with knowledge.

Results: A total of 6,312 participants were interviewed (2014: n = 2,126; 2017: n = 2,100; 2026: n = 2,086). Adequate basic knowledge increased from 2.6% in 2014 to 5.8% in 2017 (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.63-3.16; p < 0.001) and 10.3% in 2026 (OR 3.45, 95% CI 2.54-4.75; p < 0.001). In 2026, 70.0% of participants acknowledged that earlier diagnosis and treatment improve survival. Awareness of long-term disabilities was lower (24.4%). Higher educational attainment was the strongest determinant of knowledge across all domains. Younger age, male sex, residence outside state capitals, and lower household income were independently associated with lower knowledge.

Conclusion: Public awareness of sepsis in Brazil has improved substantially over the past decade, suggesting a positive impact of national and international awareness initiatives. Nevertheless, important knowledge gaps persist, and awareness continues to be strongly influenced by socioeconomic factors, highlighting the need for continued efforts to improve sepsis awareness and promote equitable access to health information.

巴西败血症知识的时间趋势和社会决定因素:来自三个国家横断面调查的结果。
背景:公众对脓毒症的认识对于早期识别警告信号和及时就医行为至关重要,但来自资源有限的环境的数据仍然很少。方法:我们通过2014年、2017年和2026年进行的横断面调查来评估巴西的脓毒症知识。标准化问卷调查采用面对面访谈的方式,按年龄、性别和地理区域进行随机抽样。足够的基础知识被定义为听说过脓毒症这个术语,并正确识别它是一种严重的宿主对感染的反应。在2026年,我们进一步评估了脓毒症的时间依赖性和脓毒症后的长期残疾知识。多变量逻辑回归确定了与知识相关的因素。结果:共采访了6312名参与者(2014年:n = 2126; 2017年:n = 2100; 2026年:n = 2086)。足够的基础知识从2014年的2.6%增加到2017年的5.8% (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.63-3.16, p < 0.001),到2026年增加到10.3% (OR 3.45, 95% CI 2.54-4.75, p < 0.001)。2026年,70.0%的参与者承认早期诊断和治疗可以改善生存。对长期残疾的认识较低(24.4%)。高等教育程度是所有领域知识的最强决定因素。年龄较小、男性、居住在州首府以外、家庭收入较低与知识水平较低独立相关。结论:巴西公众对败血症的认识在过去十年中有了显著提高,这表明国家和国际意识活动产生了积极影响。然而,重要的知识差距仍然存在,社会经济因素继续强烈影响对败血症的认识,这突出表明需要继续努力提高对败血症的认识,促进公平获得卫生信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书