Linking Metabolic Subgroups and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in GDM: A Complementary Analytic Approach of Logistic Regressions and Machine Learning.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-18 DOI:10.1111/dom.71246
Yanjing Zeng, Jing Zhou, Zhengbin Ou, Yun Li, Junping Fan, Nan Wang, Chunxia Cheng, Hui Yang, Man Ping Wang, Jie Dong, Jia Guo
{"title":"Linking Metabolic Subgroups and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in GDM: A Complementary Analytic Approach of Logistic Regressions and Machine Learning.","authors":"Yanjing Zeng, Jing Zhou, Zhengbin Ou, Yun Li, Junping Fan, Nan Wang, Chunxia Cheng, Hui Yang, Man Ping Wang, Jie Dong, Jia Guo","doi":"10.1111/dom.71246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Associations between metabolic heterogeneity in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse pregnancy outcomes have often been explored without considering interrelated metabolic biomarkers, limiting accurate predictions of outcomes. This study aimed to identify metabolic heterogeneity across distinct classes of biomarkers in GDM women and link this metabolic heterogeneity with adverse pregnancy outcomes through a complementary analytic approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using medical records of GDM women from 2018 to 2023 in Central South China. We identified metabolic heterogeneity of GDM using unsupervised k-means clustering based on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 0, 1 and 2 h, uric acid (UA), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). We then linked this metabolic heterogeneity to adverse pregnancy outcomes through a complementary analytic approach, including logistic regression for group traits and machine learning for single features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first approach categorised 2246 GDM women into four distinct metabolic subgroups: reference (36%, relatively normal and average biomarker levels), fasting hyperglycemia (23.3%), hyperuricemia and hypertriglyceridemia (34.9%) and combined metabolic dysregulation (5.8%). The complementary analytic approach yielded consistent results. The hyperuricemia and hypertriglyceridemia subgroup showed higher odds of preterm delivery (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.15-3.01). The combined metabolic dysregulation subgroup had the highest risks of preterm delivery (OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 1.79-6.65), insulin treatment (OR = 14.67, 95% CI = 8.72-24.66) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.48-5.01). SHAP analysis showed that 57%-71% of the subgroup-defining biomarkers ranked among the top 15 predictive features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms the metabolic heterogeneity in GDM women, supporting synergistic effects among metabolic factors and the need for integrated metabolic management. The identified metabolic subgroups may facilitate risk stratification in real-world settings by integrating biomarkers from multiple metabolic pathways. Women in the hyperuricemia and hypertriglyceridemia subgroup, as well as those in the combined metabolic dysregulation subgroup, urgently require interventions to improve pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"10292-10305"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.71246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Associations between metabolic heterogeneity in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse pregnancy outcomes have often been explored without considering interrelated metabolic biomarkers, limiting accurate predictions of outcomes. This study aimed to identify metabolic heterogeneity across distinct classes of biomarkers in GDM women and link this metabolic heterogeneity with adverse pregnancy outcomes through a complementary analytic approach.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using medical records of GDM women from 2018 to 2023 in Central South China. We identified metabolic heterogeneity of GDM using unsupervised k-means clustering based on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 0, 1 and 2 h, uric acid (UA), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). We then linked this metabolic heterogeneity to adverse pregnancy outcomes through a complementary analytic approach, including logistic regression for group traits and machine learning for single features.

Results: The first approach categorised 2246 GDM women into four distinct metabolic subgroups: reference (36%, relatively normal and average biomarker levels), fasting hyperglycemia (23.3%), hyperuricemia and hypertriglyceridemia (34.9%) and combined metabolic dysregulation (5.8%). The complementary analytic approach yielded consistent results. The hyperuricemia and hypertriglyceridemia subgroup showed higher odds of preterm delivery (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.15-3.01). The combined metabolic dysregulation subgroup had the highest risks of preterm delivery (OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 1.79-6.65), insulin treatment (OR = 14.67, 95% CI = 8.72-24.66) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.48-5.01). SHAP analysis showed that 57%-71% of the subgroup-defining biomarkers ranked among the top 15 predictive features.

Conclusions: This study confirms the metabolic heterogeneity in GDM women, supporting synergistic effects among metabolic factors and the need for integrated metabolic management. The identified metabolic subgroups may facilitate risk stratification in real-world settings by integrating biomarkers from multiple metabolic pathways. Women in the hyperuricemia and hypertriglyceridemia subgroup, as well as those in the combined metabolic dysregulation subgroup, urgently require interventions to improve pregnancy outcomes.

链接代谢亚群和妊娠不良结局的GDM:逻辑回归和机器学习的互补分析方法。
目的:研究妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)女性代谢异质性与不良妊娠结局之间的关系时,往往没有考虑相关的代谢生物标志物,这限制了对结局的准确预测。本研究旨在确定GDM女性不同类别生物标志物的代谢异质性,并通过互补分析方法将这种代谢异质性与不良妊娠结局联系起来。方法:利用2018年至2023年中国中南地区GDM妇女的医疗记录进行回顾性队列研究。基于口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT) 0、1和2小时、尿酸(UA)、甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)和低密度脂蛋白(LDL),我们使用无监督k均值聚类方法确定了GDM的代谢异质性。然后,我们通过互补分析方法将这种代谢异质性与不良妊娠结局联系起来,包括群体特征的逻辑回归和单一特征的机器学习。结果:第一种方法将2246名GDM女性分为四个不同的代谢亚组:参考(36%,相对正常和平均生物标志物水平),空腹高血糖(23.3%),高尿酸血症和高甘油三酯血症(34.9%)和合并代谢失调(5.8%)。互补分析方法产生了一致的结果。高尿酸血症和高甘油三酯血症亚组早产的几率更高(OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.15-3.01)。合并代谢失调亚组发生早产(OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 1.79 ~ 6.65)、胰岛素治疗(OR = 14.67, 95% CI = 8.72 ~ 24.66)和妊娠期高血压疾病(OR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.48 ~ 5.01)的风险最高。SHAP分析显示,57%-71%的亚组定义生物标志物排在前15个预测特征之列。结论:本研究证实了GDM女性的代谢异质性,支持代谢因素之间的协同作用和综合代谢管理的必要性。通过整合来自多种代谢途径的生物标志物,确定的代谢亚群可能促进现实环境中的风险分层。高尿酸血症和高甘油三酯血症亚组以及合并代谢失调亚组的妇女迫切需要干预措施来改善妊娠结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书