Design, synthesis, thymidylate synthase docking, and biological evaluation of Pyrazolone- and Benzothiazole-functionalized Bis(acetamide) derivatives in Caco-2 and HDF cells.
Ihab Abbas Taher, Firyal Weli Askar, Fatin Fadhel Al-Kazzaz
{"title":"Design, synthesis, thymidylate synthase docking, and biological evaluation of Pyrazolone- and Benzothiazole-functionalized Bis(acetamide) derivatives in Caco-2 and HDF cells.","authors":"Ihab Abbas Taher, Firyal Weli Askar, Fatin Fadhel Al-Kazzaz","doi":"10.1016/j.bioorg.2026.110393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three phenylene-linked bis(acetamide) compounds were synthesized and evaluated to determine how pyrazolone or benzothiazole terminal groups alter chemical radical-scavenging, cellular metabolic viability, and predicted accommodation within human thymidylate synthase (hTS). Spectroscopic characterization supported the proposed structures, while RP-HPLC indicated purities of 94.80% for R1, 96.72% for R2, and 90.16% for R3. Redocking of co-crystallized dUMP reproduced its experimental pose with an RMSD of 1.3 Å, supporting pose recovery by the docking setup. R2 and R3 produced AutoDock Vina scores of -9.2 and - 9.4 kcal/Mol, respectively, compared with -7.45 kcal/Mol for FdUMP; these values were interpreted as exploratory scoring outputs rather than evidence of hTS inhibition. In the cell-free DPPH assay, R3 showed the strongest response among the synthesized compounds, with an IC₅₀ of 28.95 μg/mL, whereas R1 and R2 gave 46.29 and 47.64 μg/mL, respectively, and ascorbic acid gave 19.79 μg/mL. In Caco-2 cells, R2 and R3 yielded comparable MTT-derived IC₅₀ values of 59.94 and 60.43 μg/mL, both lower than R1 at 148.7 μg/mL. Their corresponding HDF IC₅₀ values were 141.2, 109.5, and 161.7 μg/mL, giving HDF/Caco-2 indices of 2.36, 1.81, and 1.09. 5-fluorouracil showed an index of 3.16. Comparisons between Caco-2 and HDF fitted logIC₅₀ values were significant for R2 and R3 but not R1, and no compound reached the stringent SI threshold of 10. Thus, DPPH reactivity and cellular response followed different trends, and the modest differential sensitivity, limited compound series, and suboptimal purity of R3 support cautious interpretation and further mechanistic validation using adequately purified compound batches.</p>","PeriodicalId":257,"journal":{"name":"Bioorganic Chemistry","volume":"181 ","pages":"110393"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioorganic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2026.110393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Three phenylene-linked bis(acetamide) compounds were synthesized and evaluated to determine how pyrazolone or benzothiazole terminal groups alter chemical radical-scavenging, cellular metabolic viability, and predicted accommodation within human thymidylate synthase (hTS). Spectroscopic characterization supported the proposed structures, while RP-HPLC indicated purities of 94.80% for R1, 96.72% for R2, and 90.16% for R3. Redocking of co-crystallized dUMP reproduced its experimental pose with an RMSD of 1.3 Å, supporting pose recovery by the docking setup. R2 and R3 produced AutoDock Vina scores of -9.2 and - 9.4 kcal/Mol, respectively, compared with -7.45 kcal/Mol for FdUMP; these values were interpreted as exploratory scoring outputs rather than evidence of hTS inhibition. In the cell-free DPPH assay, R3 showed the strongest response among the synthesized compounds, with an IC₅₀ of 28.95 μg/mL, whereas R1 and R2 gave 46.29 and 47.64 μg/mL, respectively, and ascorbic acid gave 19.79 μg/mL. In Caco-2 cells, R2 and R3 yielded comparable MTT-derived IC₅₀ values of 59.94 and 60.43 μg/mL, both lower than R1 at 148.7 μg/mL. Their corresponding HDF IC₅₀ values were 141.2, 109.5, and 161.7 μg/mL, giving HDF/Caco-2 indices of 2.36, 1.81, and 1.09. 5-fluorouracil showed an index of 3.16. Comparisons between Caco-2 and HDF fitted logIC₅₀ values were significant for R2 and R3 but not R1, and no compound reached the stringent SI threshold of 10. Thus, DPPH reactivity and cellular response followed different trends, and the modest differential sensitivity, limited compound series, and suboptimal purity of R3 support cautious interpretation and further mechanistic validation using adequately purified compound batches.
期刊介绍:
Bioorganic Chemistry publishes research that addresses biological questions at the molecular level, using organic chemistry and principles of physical organic chemistry. The scope of the journal covers a range of topics at the organic chemistry-biology interface, including: enzyme catalysis, biotransformation and enzyme inhibition; nucleic acids chemistry; medicinal chemistry; natural product chemistry, natural product synthesis and natural product biosynthesis; antimicrobial agents; lipid and peptide chemistry; biophysical chemistry; biological probes; bio-orthogonal chemistry and biomimetic chemistry.
For manuscripts dealing with synthetic bioactive compounds, the Journal requires that the molecular target of the compounds described must be known, and must be demonstrated experimentally in the manuscript. For studies involving natural products, if the molecular target is unknown, some data beyond simple cell-based toxicity studies to provide insight into the mechanism of action is required. Studies supported by molecular docking are welcome, but must be supported by experimental data. The Journal does not consider manuscripts that are purely theoretical or computational in nature.
The Journal publishes regular articles, short communications and reviews. Reviews are normally invited by Editors or Editorial Board members. Authors of unsolicited reviews should first contact an Editor or Editorial Board member to determine whether the proposed article is within the scope of the Journal.