External validation of the AAA+ survival model in a large Chinese cohort with essential thrombocythaemia.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
British Journal of Haematology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-18 DOI:10.1111/bjh.70764
Lin Zhang, Wenjing Gu, Huan Dong, Xiaofan Liu, Feng Xue, Yunfei Chen, Wei Liu, Mankai Ju, Ting Sun, Xinyue Dai, Yanmei Xu, Anqi Zhang, Xinmiao Qu, Shuang Ma, Renchi Yang, Rongfeng Fu, Lei Zhang
{"title":"External validation of the AAA+ survival model in a large Chinese cohort with essential thrombocythaemia.","authors":"Lin Zhang, Wenjing Gu, Huan Dong, Xiaofan Liu, Feng Xue, Yunfei Chen, Wei Liu, Mankai Ju, Ting Sun, Xinyue Dai, Yanmei Xu, Anqi Zhang, Xinmiao Qu, Shuang Ma, Renchi Yang, Rongfeng Fu, Lei Zhang","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Triple A Plus (AAA+) is a recently proposed survival prediction model for essential thrombocythaemia (ET) intended for settings in which next-generation sequencing is unavailable. However, independent validation in non-Western populations remains limited. A retrospective cohort of 995 consecutive patients diagnosed with ET at a single centre between 2001 and 2022 was screened. Primary external validation was performed in 850 patients who had complete baseline variables required for the original AAA+ calculation. In the external-validation cohort (n = 850; deaths = 116), AAA+ demonstrated strong discrimination for overall survival (C-index 0.892, 95% confidence interval 0.866-0.917). Time-dependent analyses indicated superior discrimination across follow-up, with 5- and 10-year area under the curve values of 0.902 and 0.912, respectively, exceeding those of AAA (0.873 and 0.894) and International Prognostic Score for Essential Thrombocythemia (0.759 and 0.857). For 10-year all-cause mortality, decision-curve analysis based on locally recalibrated absolute risks showed that AAA+ provided favourable net benefit across most clinically relevant thresholds. Diagnostic period-adjusted analyses showed higher hazards of death in intermediate- and high-risk patients than in low-risk patients, with no clear evidence of temporal heterogeneity or monotonic attenuation of the AAA+ risk gradient over time. AAA+ exhibited robust risk stratification and good discrimination for overall survival in this large Chinese ET cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":" ","pages":"1725-1734"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70764","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Triple A Plus (AAA+) is a recently proposed survival prediction model for essential thrombocythaemia (ET) intended for settings in which next-generation sequencing is unavailable. However, independent validation in non-Western populations remains limited. A retrospective cohort of 995 consecutive patients diagnosed with ET at a single centre between 2001 and 2022 was screened. Primary external validation was performed in 850 patients who had complete baseline variables required for the original AAA+ calculation. In the external-validation cohort (n = 850; deaths = 116), AAA+ demonstrated strong discrimination for overall survival (C-index 0.892, 95% confidence interval 0.866-0.917). Time-dependent analyses indicated superior discrimination across follow-up, with 5- and 10-year area under the curve values of 0.902 and 0.912, respectively, exceeding those of AAA (0.873 and 0.894) and International Prognostic Score for Essential Thrombocythemia (0.759 and 0.857). For 10-year all-cause mortality, decision-curve analysis based on locally recalibrated absolute risks showed that AAA+ provided favourable net benefit across most clinically relevant thresholds. Diagnostic period-adjusted analyses showed higher hazards of death in intermediate- and high-risk patients than in low-risk patients, with no clear evidence of temporal heterogeneity or monotonic attenuation of the AAA+ risk gradient over time. AAA+ exhibited robust risk stratification and good discrimination for overall survival in this large Chinese ET cohort.

中国原发性血小板血症患者的AAA+生存模型的外部验证
AAA+是最近提出的原发性血小板增多症(ET)的生存预测模型,用于无法获得下一代测序的环境。然而,在非西方人群中的独立验证仍然有限。对2001年至2022年间在单一中心连续诊断为ET的995例患者进行回顾性队列筛查。在850名患者中进行了初步的外部验证,这些患者具有原始AAA+计算所需的完整基线变量。在外部验证队列(n = 850,死亡= 116)中,AAA+对总生存率有很强的判别性(c指数0.892,95%可信区间0.866-0.917)。时间依赖性分析显示,在随访中,5年和10年曲线下面积分别为0.902和0.912,优于AAA(0.873和0.894)和国际预后评分(0.759和0.857)。对于10年全因死亡率,基于局部重新校准的绝对风险的决策曲线分析显示,AAA+在大多数临床相关阈值上提供了有利的净收益。诊断期调整分析显示,中高风险患者的死亡风险高于低风险患者,没有明确的证据表明时间异质性或AAA+风险梯度随时间的单调衰减。在这个庞大的中国ET队列中,AAA+表现出强大的风险分层和良好的总生存率区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
565
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Haematology publishes original research papers in clinical, laboratory and experimental haematology. The Journal also features annotations, reviews, short reports, images in haematology and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书