Barriers to Implementing Specialist and Advanced Specialist Nursing Roles in Jordan: Perspectives of Regulators, Nursing Leaders, and Educators

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Muntaha K. Gharaibeh, Rabia S. Allari, Safa A. Al-Ashram, Rowaida Al Maaitah
{"title":"Barriers to Implementing Specialist and Advanced Specialist Nursing Roles in Jordan: Perspectives of Regulators, Nursing Leaders, and Educators","authors":"Muntaha K. Gharaibeh,&nbsp;Rabia S. Allari,&nbsp;Safa A. Al-Ashram,&nbsp;Rowaida Al Maaitah","doi":"10.1111/jnu.70129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Specialization in nursing is essential to enhance effectiveness, quality, and accessibility of healthcare. Barriers to implementing advanced practice nurses and specialist nurses have been widely reported to limit advanced practice roles in many countries. Identifying these barriers and promoting integration of the role requires an understanding of stakeholders' perspectives. The current study aimed to explore barriers to implementing specialist and advanced specialist nursing roles in Jordan from the perspective of nursing regulators, nursing leaders, and nursing educators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative descriptive design was used to collect data from a purposive sample of 23 nursing stakeholders from the private and public sectors. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews using an interview guide developed specifically for this study. Sample adequacy was guided by data saturation. Inductive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's 6-step approach was used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Based on the participants' narratives, findings were classified into four main themes and six sub-themes: (1) Policy and Regulatory Constraints, with two sub-themes: Scope of Practice limitations and Role Ambiguity, (2) Knowledge and Skill Gaps with two sub-themes: Incompetent Graduates and the Nature of Educational Programs, (3) Organizational and Administrative Obstacles with two sub-themes: Inefficient Management Structures and Burdens, and (4) the Reluctance to Implement. In addition, participants proposed recommendations and approaches such as clarifying scope of practice, defining roles, curricular reforms, and creating a supportive organization to facilitate effective role implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates that implementation of specialist and advanced specialist roles in Jordan is constrained by educational, regulatory organizational structure gaps, and absence of coordinated policy alignment across all levels. Establishing a collaborative implementation model supported by effective policies is crucial to assist healthcare institutions in overcoming obstacles and barriers and to support the specialized roles in Jordan.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":"58 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.70129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Specialization in nursing is essential to enhance effectiveness, quality, and accessibility of healthcare. Barriers to implementing advanced practice nurses and specialist nurses have been widely reported to limit advanced practice roles in many countries. Identifying these barriers and promoting integration of the role requires an understanding of stakeholders' perspectives. The current study aimed to explore barriers to implementing specialist and advanced specialist nursing roles in Jordan from the perspective of nursing regulators, nursing leaders, and nursing educators.

Methods

A qualitative descriptive design was used to collect data from a purposive sample of 23 nursing stakeholders from the private and public sectors. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews using an interview guide developed specifically for this study. Sample adequacy was guided by data saturation. Inductive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's 6-step approach was used.

Results

Based on the participants' narratives, findings were classified into four main themes and six sub-themes: (1) Policy and Regulatory Constraints, with two sub-themes: Scope of Practice limitations and Role Ambiguity, (2) Knowledge and Skill Gaps with two sub-themes: Incompetent Graduates and the Nature of Educational Programs, (3) Organizational and Administrative Obstacles with two sub-themes: Inefficient Management Structures and Burdens, and (4) the Reluctance to Implement. In addition, participants proposed recommendations and approaches such as clarifying scope of practice, defining roles, curricular reforms, and creating a supportive organization to facilitate effective role implementation.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that implementation of specialist and advanced specialist roles in Jordan is constrained by educational, regulatory organizational structure gaps, and absence of coordinated policy alignment across all levels. Establishing a collaborative implementation model supported by effective policies is crucial to assist healthcare institutions in overcoming obstacles and barriers and to support the specialized roles in Jordan.

在约旦实施专科和高级专科护理角色的障碍:监管者、护理领导者和教育者的观点
专业护理对提高医疗保健的有效性、质量和可及性至关重要。实施高级执业护士和专科护士的障碍被广泛报道,限制了许多国家的高级执业角色。识别这些障碍并促进角色的整合需要了解利益相关者的观点。本研究旨在从护理管理者、护理领导者和护理教育者的角度探讨在约旦实施专科和高级专科护理角色的障碍。方法采用定性描述设计,收集来自私营和公共部门的23名护理利益相关者的目的样本数据。数据通过深度半结构化访谈收集,使用专门为本研究开发的访谈指南。样本充分性以数据饱和度为指导。采用Braun和Clarke的六步法归纳主题分析。结果根据参与者的叙述,研究结果分为四个主要主题和六个次要主题:(1)政策和监管约束,包括两个次要主题:实践限制范围和角色模糊;(2)知识和技能差距,包括两个次要主题:不称职的毕业生和教育计划的性质;(3)组织和行政障碍,包括两个次要主题:低效的管理结构和负担,以及(4)不愿执行。此外,与会者还提出了澄清实践范围、定义角色、课程改革和创建支持组织以促进有效角色实施等建议和方法。本研究表明,在约旦,专家和高级专家角色的实施受到教育、监管组织结构差距和各级缺乏协调一致的政策的制约。建立一个由有效政策支持的协作执行模式对于帮助保健机构克服障碍和障碍以及支持约旦的专门作用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书