Soil Seed Bank Holds Some Potential for Natural Regeneration in a Semi-Arid Rangeland

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2026-08-19 DOI:10.1111/aec.70278
Bettina L. Ignacio, Angela T. Moles, Catherine A. Offord, Giancarlo M. Chiarenza, Ben Maslen, Frank A. Hemmings, Keith Leggett, Zoe A. Xirocostas
{"title":"Soil Seed Bank Holds Some Potential for Natural Regeneration in a Semi-Arid Rangeland","authors":"Bettina L. Ignacio,&nbsp;Angela T. Moles,&nbsp;Catherine A. Offord,&nbsp;Giancarlo M. Chiarenza,&nbsp;Ben Maslen,&nbsp;Frank A. Hemmings,&nbsp;Keith Leggett,&nbsp;Zoe A. Xirocostas","doi":"10.1111/aec.70278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Natural regeneration of degraded lands can be facilitated by the recruitment of plant species from the soil seed bank. However, the composition of soil seed banks in arid Australia has seldom been studied. We addressed this knowledge gap by quantifying the soil seed bank of chenopod shrubland and remnant <i>Acacia aneura</i> (mulga) stands in an ex-agricultural site in New South Wales, Australia. We also assessed the effect of three germination pre-treatments. Overall, the soil seed bank yielded 113 species, only 11 of which (14%) were introduced species. Despite mulga historically being a dominant canopy species at our site, we found no evidence that it has a viable seed bank. Distance from water troughs (a proxy for past grazing intensity) did not affect seed bank richness or diversity, but seed bank density doubled between 16 m and 1024 m. Samples treated with gibberellic acid solution and controls (water only) produced a similar density of germinants (4843 vs. 4337 seedlings m<sup>−2</sup>), while soil samples treated with hot water yielded only 1118 seedlings m<sup>−2</sup>. Our results suggest a substantial and diverse native seed bank exists for natural regeneration, but some key species will not return without ecological restoration<i>.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"51 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70278","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural regeneration of degraded lands can be facilitated by the recruitment of plant species from the soil seed bank. However, the composition of soil seed banks in arid Australia has seldom been studied. We addressed this knowledge gap by quantifying the soil seed bank of chenopod shrubland and remnant Acacia aneura (mulga) stands in an ex-agricultural site in New South Wales, Australia. We also assessed the effect of three germination pre-treatments. Overall, the soil seed bank yielded 113 species, only 11 of which (14%) were introduced species. Despite mulga historically being a dominant canopy species at our site, we found no evidence that it has a viable seed bank. Distance from water troughs (a proxy for past grazing intensity) did not affect seed bank richness or diversity, but seed bank density doubled between 16 m and 1024 m. Samples treated with gibberellic acid solution and controls (water only) produced a similar density of germinants (4843 vs. 4337 seedlings m−2), while soil samples treated with hot water yielded only 1118 seedlings m−2. Our results suggest a substantial and diverse native seed bank exists for natural regeneration, but some key species will not return without ecological restoration.

半干旱牧场土壤种子库具有自然更新的潜力
从土壤种子库中吸收植物物种可以促进退化土地的自然更新。然而,对澳大利亚干旱地区土壤种子库组成的研究却很少。我们通过量化澳大利亚新南威尔士州一个前农业遗址的藜科灌木和残余金钱树(mulga)的土壤种子库来解决这一知识差距。我们还评估了三种发芽预处理的效果。土壤种子库共有113种,其中引进种仅11种(14%)。尽管mulga在历史上是我们站点的主要树冠物种,但我们没有发现证据表明它有一个可行的种子库。与水槽的距离(过去放牧强度的代表)对种子库丰富度和多样性没有影响,但种子库密度在16 m和1024 m之间增加了一倍。赤霉素溶液处理的样品和对照(仅水)产生相似的萌发密度(4843对4337幼苗m−2),而热水处理的土壤样品仅产生1118幼苗m−2。我们的研究结果表明,存在大量多样的本地种子库,但如果没有生态恢复,一些关键物种将无法返回。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书