M. R. Huffman, D. A. Brain, K. N. Singer, J. C. Johnston, C. A. Caldwell
{"title":"Comparing Monte Carlo Models of Impact Alteration of Planetary Atmospheres","authors":"M. R. Huffman, D. A. Brain, K. N. Singer, J. C. Johnston, C. A. Caldwell","doi":"10.1029/2025JE009581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One process that affects atmospheric surface pressure is impact bombardment. The evolution of a planet's atmosphere under impact bombardment is an open question. We use a Monte Carlo method to evolve a range (0.006–92.5 bar) of initial atmospheres at Mars, Earth, and Venus under bombardment of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>5</mn>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n <msup>\n <mn>0</mn>\n <mn>6</mn>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $5\\times 1{0}^{6}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> impactors using seven individual models. Since these seven models are best suited for specific impactor size regimes, we also combine these models into a composite model and compare it to other existing composites. Alterations to the existing models are required to apply to broad initial conditions. If we use each component model for every impactor, starting from present-day atmospheric pressure, we find about two or three orders of magnitude spread in the final atmospheric pressure for low initial pressures. For high initial pressures, we see a spread of about fourteen orders of magnitude. Given these differences, we suggest that the use of any one model to determine atmospheric change due to impact bombardment is risky. Most models and starting parameters result in net growth between <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Δ</mi>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mn>0.01</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\Delta }P=+0.01$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mn>100</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${+}100$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> bar for low initial pressures. For high initial pressures, the net change in atmospheric pressure can vary between about ΔP = −100 and +100 bar. Our composite model shows that the atmospheres of Venus, Earth, and Mars tend to grow under bombardment, with Earth's atmosphere growing most quickly. For an early Martian (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </msub>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${P}_{0}=1$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> bar) and an early terrestrial (with an initial pressure of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </msub>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>0.25</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${P}_{0}=0.25$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> bar) atmosphere, Earth’s atmosphere tends to grow under bombardment, but Mars’s could grow or shrink. The results suggested here, where the models are universally applied, suggest that impact bombardment was likely a significant source of volatiles in the early Solar System. Additional work and careful consideration of how impact events affect the evolution of planetary atmospheres is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"131 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JE009581","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JE009581","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One process that affects atmospheric surface pressure is impact bombardment. The evolution of a planet's atmosphere under impact bombardment is an open question. We use a Monte Carlo method to evolve a range (0.006–92.5 bar) of initial atmospheres at Mars, Earth, and Venus under bombardment of impactors using seven individual models. Since these seven models are best suited for specific impactor size regimes, we also combine these models into a composite model and compare it to other existing composites. Alterations to the existing models are required to apply to broad initial conditions. If we use each component model for every impactor, starting from present-day atmospheric pressure, we find about two or three orders of magnitude spread in the final atmospheric pressure for low initial pressures. For high initial pressures, we see a spread of about fourteen orders of magnitude. Given these differences, we suggest that the use of any one model to determine atmospheric change due to impact bombardment is risky. Most models and starting parameters result in net growth between and bar for low initial pressures. For high initial pressures, the net change in atmospheric pressure can vary between about ΔP = −100 and +100 bar. Our composite model shows that the atmospheres of Venus, Earth, and Mars tend to grow under bombardment, with Earth's atmosphere growing most quickly. For an early Martian ( bar) and an early terrestrial (with an initial pressure of bar) atmosphere, Earth’s atmosphere tends to grow under bombardment, but Mars’s could grow or shrink. The results suggested here, where the models are universally applied, suggest that impact bombardment was likely a significant source of volatiles in the early Solar System. Additional work and careful consideration of how impact events affect the evolution of planetary atmospheres is needed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.