{"title":"Effect of Lunar Rotation on Antipodal Ejecta Deposition","authors":"S. Wakita, B. C. Johnson","doi":"10.1029/2026JE009799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Moon's crust exhibits strong magnetic anomalies that likely record ancient magnetic fields produced by a core dynamo. Lunar materials have low magnetic susceptibility, but impactor material with high susceptibility may record the Moon's ancient dynamo. Some magnetic anomalies are antipodal to lunar basins and it is hypothesized that impact ejecta accumulates at the basin antipode and records the ancient lunar magnetic field. Previous impact simulations, which ignored the rotation of the Moon, support this hypothesis. Here, we reevaluate the deposition of antipodal ejecta by considering the rotation of the Moon. Assuming that the rotational period of the Moon is the same as the current day, we find that the rotation of the Moon does not strongly affect the deposition of the antipodal ejecta if impacts occur near the poles. In contrast, rotation has a considerable effect on antipodal deposits for impacts occurring near the equator. An eastward impact at a 45° incidence angle results in almost no antipodal ejecta, however, an eastward impact with a 30° incidence angle accumulates more antipodal ejecta than the non-rotating case. It is hard to determine the impactor's direction and location, for basins without an ellipsoidal shape and/or an asymmetric ejecta blanket. Nevertheless, our work demonstrates that care must be taken in interpreting the magnetic anomalies antipodal to lunar basins and that the effect of rotation should not be ignored.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"131 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2026JE009799","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026JE009799","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Moon's crust exhibits strong magnetic anomalies that likely record ancient magnetic fields produced by a core dynamo. Lunar materials have low magnetic susceptibility, but impactor material with high susceptibility may record the Moon's ancient dynamo. Some magnetic anomalies are antipodal to lunar basins and it is hypothesized that impact ejecta accumulates at the basin antipode and records the ancient lunar magnetic field. Previous impact simulations, which ignored the rotation of the Moon, support this hypothesis. Here, we reevaluate the deposition of antipodal ejecta by considering the rotation of the Moon. Assuming that the rotational period of the Moon is the same as the current day, we find that the rotation of the Moon does not strongly affect the deposition of the antipodal ejecta if impacts occur near the poles. In contrast, rotation has a considerable effect on antipodal deposits for impacts occurring near the equator. An eastward impact at a 45° incidence angle results in almost no antipodal ejecta, however, an eastward impact with a 30° incidence angle accumulates more antipodal ejecta than the non-rotating case. It is hard to determine the impactor's direction and location, for basins without an ellipsoidal shape and/or an asymmetric ejecta blanket. Nevertheless, our work demonstrates that care must be taken in interpreting the magnetic anomalies antipodal to lunar basins and that the effect of rotation should not be ignored.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.