Baran Teoman, Jonghun Lee, Phil Mai, Jimmy Yu, Paulo Kolle, Mark Vandeven, Aileen Cabelly, Monica Morelli, Andrei Potanin
{"title":"Sensory Investigation of Toothpaste Foam Using Rheology and Dynamic Foam Analysis","authors":"Baran Teoman, Jonghun Lee, Phil Mai, Jimmy Yu, Paulo Kolle, Mark Vandeven, Aileen Cabelly, Monica Morelli, Andrei Potanin","doi":"10.1111/jtxs.70110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Consumer acceptance of toothpaste formulations is heavily influenced by oral tactile sensations, particularly foaming behavior. While Home Use Tests (HUTs) provide definitive consumer insights, they are resource-intensive and time-consuming. This study establishes an accelerated laboratory methodology to predict consumer perception of toothpaste foaming using instrumental rheology and dynamic foam analysis (DFA). Fifteen custom made toothpaste formulations varying in surfactant systems, abrasives, and sensates were evaluated. Laboratory evaluation included foam generation via a customized blender-rheometer geometry to monitor the viscoelastic properties (tan <i>δ</i>) of a paste-water slurry, paste yield stress analysis, and structural profiling via DFA. Multivariable linear regression revealed that the initial foam loss factor (tan <i>δ</i>) correlates strongly with consumer panel ratings for both Foam Degree (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.7) and Foam Liking (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.6). Integrating paste yield stress (<i>σ</i><sub>y</sub>) into a multivariate model markedly enhanced the prediction (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.8). Alternative multivariable models using tan <i>δ</i> and initial DFA parameters—specifically bubble count and average bubble radius—similarly yielded highly accurate predictions of mouthfeel (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.8). The findings demonstrate that formulations with low paste yield stress and high foam visco-dominance (higher tan <i>δ</i>) facilitate bubble formation and produce rich, consumer-preferred “liquidish” textures. Alternative multivariable models using tan <i>δ</i> and DFA parameters were also presented. This dual rheological framework provides an instrumental proxy to screen and optimize toothpastes prior to panel studies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of texture studies","volume":"57 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of texture studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jtxs.70110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Consumer acceptance of toothpaste formulations is heavily influenced by oral tactile sensations, particularly foaming behavior. While Home Use Tests (HUTs) provide definitive consumer insights, they are resource-intensive and time-consuming. This study establishes an accelerated laboratory methodology to predict consumer perception of toothpaste foaming using instrumental rheology and dynamic foam analysis (DFA). Fifteen custom made toothpaste formulations varying in surfactant systems, abrasives, and sensates were evaluated. Laboratory evaluation included foam generation via a customized blender-rheometer geometry to monitor the viscoelastic properties (tan δ) of a paste-water slurry, paste yield stress analysis, and structural profiling via DFA. Multivariable linear regression revealed that the initial foam loss factor (tan δ) correlates strongly with consumer panel ratings for both Foam Degree (R2 = 0.7) and Foam Liking (R2 = 0.6). Integrating paste yield stress (σy) into a multivariate model markedly enhanced the prediction (R2 = 0.8). Alternative multivariable models using tan δ and initial DFA parameters—specifically bubble count and average bubble radius—similarly yielded highly accurate predictions of mouthfeel (R2 = 0.8). The findings demonstrate that formulations with low paste yield stress and high foam visco-dominance (higher tan δ) facilitate bubble formation and produce rich, consumer-preferred “liquidish” textures. Alternative multivariable models using tan δ and DFA parameters were also presented. This dual rheological framework provides an instrumental proxy to screen and optimize toothpastes prior to panel studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Texture Studies is a fully peer-reviewed international journal specialized in the physics, physiology, and psychology of food oral processing, with an emphasis on the food texture and structure, sensory perception and mouth-feel, food oral behaviour, food liking and preference. The journal was first published in 1969 and has been the primary source for disseminating advances in knowledge on all of the sciences that relate to food texture. In recent years, Journal of Texture Studies has expanded its coverage to a much broader range of texture research and continues to publish high quality original and innovative experimental-based (including numerical analysis and simulation) research concerned with all aspects of eating and food preference.
Journal of Texture Studies welcomes research articles, research notes, reviews, discussion papers, and communications from contributors of all relevant disciplines. Some key coverage areas/topics include (but not limited to):
• Physical, mechanical, and micro-structural principles of food texture
• Oral physiology
• Psychology and brain responses of eating and food sensory
• Food texture design and modification for specific consumers
• In vitro and in vivo studies of eating and swallowing
• Novel technologies and methodologies for the assessment of sensory properties
• Simulation and numerical analysis of eating and swallowing