Clinical outcomes and failure rates of combined ‘Over-the-Top’ anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis in a cohort of patients with an average age of 60 years

IF 3.2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Lorenzo Bini, Gian Andrea Lucidi, Piero Agostinone, Cristiano Liao, Alberto Grassi, Stefano Zaffagnini
{"title":"Clinical outcomes and failure rates of combined ‘Over-the-Top’ anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis in a cohort of patients with an average age of 60 years","authors":"Lorenzo Bini,&nbsp;Gian Andrea Lucidi,&nbsp;Piero Agostinone,&nbsp;Cristiano Liao,&nbsp;Alberto Grassi,&nbsp;Stefano Zaffagnini","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in older adults remains controversial, although recent evidence suggests an increasing trend toward surgical treatment. To date, no studies have specifically investigated the outcomes of combined ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with over-the-top (OTT) technique and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and failure rates of ACLR using OTT plus LET in patients aged 55 years or older.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients aged ≥55 years who underwent primary ACLR with OTT and LET techniques and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Clinical outcomes were assessed using clinical scores, such as VAS, Lysholm, KOOS, comparing preoperative and post-operative values. Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds were applied to KOOS subscales. Reoperations and graft failures were also recorded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 60.1 ± 3.2 years and a mean follow-up of 6.5 ± 3.8 years. One graft failure (3.6%) and one reoperation (3.6%) were observed. Significant improvements were noted in all clinical scores. The mean Lysholm score increased from 55.4 ± 15.9 preoperatively to 96.6 ± 6.6 postoperatively. KOOS subscales showed marked improvement, particularly in Quality of Life (41.6 ± 20.2 to 90.3 ± 12.9) and Pain (68.7 ± 12.1 to 94.2 ± 5.7).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ACLR with OTT and LET techniques in older patients demonstrated low failure rates and favourable clinical outcomes. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and to establish the role of this combined technique in this population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level IV.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70889","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in older adults remains controversial, although recent evidence suggests an increasing trend toward surgical treatment. To date, no studies have specifically investigated the outcomes of combined ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with over-the-top (OTT) technique and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and failure rates of ACLR using OTT plus LET in patients aged 55 years or older.

Methods

Patients aged ≥55 years who underwent primary ACLR with OTT and LET techniques and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Clinical outcomes were assessed using clinical scores, such as VAS, Lysholm, KOOS, comparing preoperative and post-operative values. Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds were applied to KOOS subscales. Reoperations and graft failures were also recorded.

Results

Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 60.1 ± 3.2 years and a mean follow-up of 6.5 ± 3.8 years. One graft failure (3.6%) and one reoperation (3.6%) were observed. Significant improvements were noted in all clinical scores. The mean Lysholm score increased from 55.4 ± 15.9 preoperatively to 96.6 ± 6.6 postoperatively. KOOS subscales showed marked improvement, particularly in Quality of Life (41.6 ± 20.2 to 90.3 ± 12.9) and Pain (68.7 ± 12.1 to 94.2 ± 5.7).

Conclusion

ACLR with OTT and LET techniques in older patients demonstrated low failure rates and favourable clinical outcomes. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and to establish the role of this combined technique in this population.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

在一组平均年龄为60岁的患者中,联合“过顶”前交叉韧带重建和外侧关节外肌腱固定术的临床结果和失败率
目的老年人前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂的治疗仍然存在争议,尽管最近的证据表明手术治疗的趋势越来越多。迄今为止,还没有研究专门调查过顶(OTT)技术和外侧关节外肌腱固定术(LET)联合ACL重建(ACLR)在这一人群中的结果。本研究的目的是评估55岁及以上患者使用OTT + LET进行ACLR的临床结果和失败率。方法纳入年龄≥55岁、接受OTT和LET技术的原发性ACLR患者,随访时间至少2年。采用VAS、Lysholm、kos等临床评分,比较术前和术后的评分。患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值应用于oos子量表。再次手术和移植物失败也有记录。结果28例患者符合纳入标准,平均年龄60.1±3.2岁,平均随访6.5±3.8年。1例移植失败(3.6%),1例再手术(3.6%)。所有临床评分均有显著改善。平均Lysholm评分由术前的55.4±15.9分上升至术后的96.6±6.6分。kos量表有明显改善,特别是生活质量(41.6±20.2)至90.3±12.9)和疼痛(68.7±12.1至94.2±5.7)。结论老年ACLR联合OTT和LET治疗失败率低,临床效果良好。需要更大规模的研究来证实这些发现,并确定这种联合技术在这一人群中的作用。证据等级四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书