Enhancing Polyphenol Recovery and Stability in Lemon Myrtle (Backhousia citriodora) and River Mint (Mentha australis) in Herbal Tea Infusions Using Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction and Spray-Dried Microencapsulation

IF 5.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Joseph Robert Nastasi, Laila Laila, Keely Rose Perry, Synne Hylen Røsten, Alberto Baldelli
{"title":"Enhancing Polyphenol Recovery and Stability in Lemon Myrtle (Backhousia citriodora) and River Mint (Mentha australis) in Herbal Tea Infusions Using Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction and Spray-Dried Microencapsulation","authors":"Joseph Robert Nastasi,&nbsp;Laila Laila,&nbsp;Keely Rose Perry,&nbsp;Synne Hylen Røsten,&nbsp;Alberto Baldelli","doi":"10.1007/s11947-026-04539-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluated water-based ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and spray-dried microencapsulation for producing phenolic-rich powders from Australian lemon myrtle (LM; <i>Backhousia citriodora</i>) and river mint (RM; <i>Mentha australis</i>). UAE was screened across time, amplitude and material-to-solvent ratio, with total phenolic content (TPC) used to identify the strongest tested condition. At 20 min, 30% amplitude and 1:20 m/v, method-development TPC was 25.10 ± 0.61 mg GAE/g for LM and 51.98 ± 4.28 mg GAE/g for RM. Applying these conditions to production materials, including a separately sourced commercial LM batch, yielded feed TPCs of 64.35 ± 2.72 and 37.67 ± 2.40 mg GAE/g, respectively. Spray drying with maltodextrin and maltodextrin–gum Arabic carriers gave production yields of 72.00–78.92% (LM) and 62.09–65.63% (RM), and process yields of 53.37–69.83% and 68.76–70.65%, respectively. RM showed higher TPC-based encapsulation efficiency (80.60–86.50%) than LM (59.71–68.02%), whereas LM powders had higher TPC (45.33–48.05 vs 24.25–25.63 mg GAE/g) and retention efficiency (68.8–74.9 vs 61.3–70.4%). Compound-specific encapsulation efficiency was approximately 78–85% for gallic acid in LM and 88–96% for rosmarinic acid in RM. Moisture ranged from 5.69 to 9.37%, while DPPH activity ranged from 3.31 to 10.52 mg TE/g for LM and 3.48–6.26 mg TE/g for RM. Powders had water activity of 0.42–0.47, solubility of 85.3–88.4%, Carr Index values of 39.69–46.73 and Hausner ratios of 1.66–1.88. Under the tested conditions, LM delivered greater phenolic density, while RM provided stronger proportional biomarker retention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":562,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioprocess Technology","volume":"19 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11947-026-04539-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioprocess Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11947-026-04539-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated water-based ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and spray-dried microencapsulation for producing phenolic-rich powders from Australian lemon myrtle (LM; Backhousia citriodora) and river mint (RM; Mentha australis). UAE was screened across time, amplitude and material-to-solvent ratio, with total phenolic content (TPC) used to identify the strongest tested condition. At 20 min, 30% amplitude and 1:20 m/v, method-development TPC was 25.10 ± 0.61 mg GAE/g for LM and 51.98 ± 4.28 mg GAE/g for RM. Applying these conditions to production materials, including a separately sourced commercial LM batch, yielded feed TPCs of 64.35 ± 2.72 and 37.67 ± 2.40 mg GAE/g, respectively. Spray drying with maltodextrin and maltodextrin–gum Arabic carriers gave production yields of 72.00–78.92% (LM) and 62.09–65.63% (RM), and process yields of 53.37–69.83% and 68.76–70.65%, respectively. RM showed higher TPC-based encapsulation efficiency (80.60–86.50%) than LM (59.71–68.02%), whereas LM powders had higher TPC (45.33–48.05 vs 24.25–25.63 mg GAE/g) and retention efficiency (68.8–74.9 vs 61.3–70.4%). Compound-specific encapsulation efficiency was approximately 78–85% for gallic acid in LM and 88–96% for rosmarinic acid in RM. Moisture ranged from 5.69 to 9.37%, while DPPH activity ranged from 3.31 to 10.52 mg TE/g for LM and 3.48–6.26 mg TE/g for RM. Powders had water activity of 0.42–0.47, solubility of 85.3–88.4%, Carr Index values of 39.69–46.73 and Hausner ratios of 1.66–1.88. Under the tested conditions, LM delivered greater phenolic density, while RM provided stronger proportional biomarker retention.

超声辅助提取和喷雾干燥微胶囊法提高凉茶中柠檬桃金娘和薄荷的多酚回收率和稳定性
本研究评价了水基超声辅助提取(UAE)和喷雾干燥微胶囊化制备澳洲柠檬桃(LM; Backhousia citriodora)和薄荷(RM; Mentha australis)富酚粉末的工艺。通过时间、振幅和料溶剂比筛选UAE,以总酚含量(TPC)确定最强测试条件。在20 min, 30%振幅,1:20 m/v条件下,方法开发的TPC为LM 25.10±0.61 mg GAE/g, RM 51.98±4.28 mg GAE/g。将这些条件应用于生产材料,包括单独采购的商业LM批次,饲料tpc分别为64.35±2.72和37.67±2.40 mg GAE/g。以麦芽糖糊精和麦芽糖糊精-阿拉伯胶为载体进行喷雾干燥,生产得率分别为72.00 ~ 78.92% (LM)和62.09 ~ 65.63% (RM),工艺得率分别为53.37 ~ 69.83%和68.76 ~ 70.65%。RM的包封率(80.60 ~ 86.50%)高于LM (59.71 ~ 68.02%), LM的包封率(45.33 ~ 48.05 vs 24.25 ~ 25.63 mg GAE/g)和保留率(68.8 ~ 74.9 vs 61.3 ~ 70.4%)高于LM。制剂中没食子酸的包封率为78 ~ 85%,迷迭香酸的包封率为88 ~ 96%。水分含量为5.69 ~ 9.37%,DPPH活性为3.31 ~ 10.52 mg TE/g, RM为3.48 ~ 6.26 mg TE/g。粉末的水活度为0.42 ~ 0.47,溶解度为853 ~ 88.4%,卡尔指数为39.69 ~ 46.73,豪斯纳比为1.66 ~ 1.88。在测试条件下,LM提供了更大的酚密度,而RM提供了更强的比例生物标志物保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Bioprocess Technology
Food and Bioprocess Technology 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
19.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Food and Bioprocess Technology provides an effective and timely platform for cutting-edge high quality original papers in the engineering and science of all types of food processing technologies, from the original food supply source to the consumer’s dinner table. It aims to be a leading international journal for the multidisciplinary agri-food research community. The journal focuses especially on experimental or theoretical research findings that have the potential for helping the agri-food industry to improve process efficiency, enhance product quality and, extend shelf-life of fresh and processed agri-food products. The editors present critical reviews on new perspectives to established processes, innovative and emerging technologies, and trends and future research in food and bioproducts processing. The journal also publishes short communications for rapidly disseminating preliminary results, letters to the Editor on recent developments and controversy, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书