Governing local and regional food systems for resilience - accounting for multi-agency interactions in practice

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Courtney Adamson, L. Jamila Haider, Rebecka Milestad
{"title":"Governing local and regional food systems for resilience - accounting for multi-agency interactions in practice","authors":"Courtney Adamson,&nbsp;L. Jamila Haider,&nbsp;Rebecka Milestad","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10938-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Definitions and frameworks for governing food systems point to the highly complex nature of holistically governing food-related activities from production through to consumption, and from local to global scales. Beyond this, there remains a shortage of insights into the practical dimensions of implementing holistic food system governance in practice. This study provides such an on-the-ground perspective, employing ethnographic methods to explore food governance implementation efforts by public and private actors and food practitioners in a case study in Sweden. The study draws on the conceptual lens of resilience to explore these efforts, placing focus on the way 1) food practitioners enact resilience capacities while filtering (i.e. persisting with, adapting, transforming) their practices during governance change processes, and 2) public and private actors govern for resilience by facilitating practitioner capacities to work with change. Insights drawn from the study illustrate the value of bringing together theory and concepts from social-ecological resilience and a practice perspective to study change for integrated food system governance. In particular, a focus on capacities for resilience enacted in practice highlights the importance of paying attention to interacting social, ecological and material conditions in considering potential pathways for food system governance implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10938-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-026-10938-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Definitions and frameworks for governing food systems point to the highly complex nature of holistically governing food-related activities from production through to consumption, and from local to global scales. Beyond this, there remains a shortage of insights into the practical dimensions of implementing holistic food system governance in practice. This study provides such an on-the-ground perspective, employing ethnographic methods to explore food governance implementation efforts by public and private actors and food practitioners in a case study in Sweden. The study draws on the conceptual lens of resilience to explore these efforts, placing focus on the way 1) food practitioners enact resilience capacities while filtering (i.e. persisting with, adapting, transforming) their practices during governance change processes, and 2) public and private actors govern for resilience by facilitating practitioner capacities to work with change. Insights drawn from the study illustrate the value of bringing together theory and concepts from social-ecological resilience and a practice perspective to study change for integrated food system governance. In particular, a focus on capacities for resilience enacted in practice highlights the importance of paying attention to interacting social, ecological and material conditions in considering potential pathways for food system governance implementation.

管理地方和区域粮食系统以提高恢复力——在实践中考虑多机构的相互作用
管理粮食系统的定义和框架指出,从生产到消费,从地方到全球范围,对与粮食有关的活动进行整体管理具有高度复杂性。除此之外,在实践中实施整体粮食系统治理的实际层面仍然缺乏洞察力。本研究提供了这样一个实地视角,在瑞典的一个案例研究中,采用民族志方法探索公共和私人行为者以及食品从业者在食品治理实施方面的努力。该研究利用弹性的概念视角来探索这些努力,将重点放在1)食品从业者在治理变革过程中过滤(即坚持、调整、转变)其实践的同时制定弹性能力的方式,以及2)公共和私人行为体通过促进从业者应对变革的能力来管理弹性。从该研究中得出的见解说明了将社会生态弹性和实践角度的理论和概念结合起来研究综合粮食系统治理变化的价值。特别是,在实践中制定的对恢复能力的关注突出了在考虑实施粮食系统治理的潜在途径时关注相互作用的社会、生态和物质条件的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书