Safety and adverse event profiles in neuromodulation therapies for drug-resistant epilepsy

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurotherapeutics Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-18 DOI:10.1016/j.neurot.2026.e01042
Yuta Tanoue, Masaki Izumi, Samuel S. Ahn, Dawn S. Eliashiv, Jerome Engel Jr., Ausaf A. Bari, Itzhak Fried, Aria Fallah, Hiroki Nariai
{"title":"Safety and adverse event profiles in neuromodulation therapies for drug-resistant epilepsy","authors":"Yuta Tanoue,&nbsp;Masaki Izumi,&nbsp;Samuel S. Ahn,&nbsp;Dawn S. Eliashiv,&nbsp;Jerome Engel Jr.,&nbsp;Ausaf A. Bari,&nbsp;Itzhak Fried,&nbsp;Aria Fallah,&nbsp;Hiroki Nariai","doi":"10.1016/j.neurot.2026.e01042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is associated with clinical and psychosocial burdens, and non-pharmacological therapies play an important role when seizure control cannot be achieved with antiseizure medications alone. Neuromodulation therapies, including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS), have become important options for patients who are not suitable candidates for resective or disconnective surgery. Although these modalities have demonstrated efficacy for seizure reduction, they differ in surgical invasiveness, stimulation targets, device structures, programming strategies, and long-term management requirements. These differences result in distinct adverse event (AE) profiles for treatment selection. In this review, we summarize AEs and long-term management considerations associated with VNS, DBS, and RNS and classify them into four categories: procedure-related AEs, stimulation-related AEs including neuropsychiatric and cognitive issues, device-related AEs, and long-term management considerations. VNS avoids intracranial surgery but is associated with stimulation-related laryngopharyngeal symptoms and generator and wire management. DBS allows direct modulation of deep brain networks but carries risks of intracranial lead implantation, targeting accuracy, and psychiatric or cognitive effects. RNS provides closed-loop stimulation and chronic intracranial electroencephalographic recording, but requires implantation of intracranial leads and a cranially implanted neurostimulator, localization of the epileptogenic network, and specialized long-term data review, programming, and device management. Across all three modalities, device-related infection, battery depletion or replacement, and ongoing device management are common safety concerns. Understanding these modality-specific AE profiles may help clinicians select candidates, counsel patients and families, and develop safe and sustainable long-term treatment strategies for DRE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19159,"journal":{"name":"Neurotherapeutics","volume":"23 4","pages":"Article e01042"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878747926002126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is associated with clinical and psychosocial burdens, and non-pharmacological therapies play an important role when seizure control cannot be achieved with antiseizure medications alone. Neuromodulation therapies, including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS), have become important options for patients who are not suitable candidates for resective or disconnective surgery. Although these modalities have demonstrated efficacy for seizure reduction, they differ in surgical invasiveness, stimulation targets, device structures, programming strategies, and long-term management requirements. These differences result in distinct adverse event (AE) profiles for treatment selection. In this review, we summarize AEs and long-term management considerations associated with VNS, DBS, and RNS and classify them into four categories: procedure-related AEs, stimulation-related AEs including neuropsychiatric and cognitive issues, device-related AEs, and long-term management considerations. VNS avoids intracranial surgery but is associated with stimulation-related laryngopharyngeal symptoms and generator and wire management. DBS allows direct modulation of deep brain networks but carries risks of intracranial lead implantation, targeting accuracy, and psychiatric or cognitive effects. RNS provides closed-loop stimulation and chronic intracranial electroencephalographic recording, but requires implantation of intracranial leads and a cranially implanted neurostimulator, localization of the epileptogenic network, and specialized long-term data review, programming, and device management. Across all three modalities, device-related infection, battery depletion or replacement, and ongoing device management are common safety concerns. Understanding these modality-specific AE profiles may help clinicians select candidates, counsel patients and families, and develop safe and sustainable long-term treatment strategies for DRE.
耐药癫痫的神经调节疗法的安全性和不良事件概况
耐药癫痫(DRE)与临床和社会心理负担有关,当仅靠抗癫痫药物无法控制癫痫发作时,非药物治疗发挥了重要作用。神经调节疗法,包括迷走神经刺激(VNS)、深部脑刺激(DBS)和反应性神经刺激(RNS),已经成为不适合切除或分离手术的患者的重要选择。虽然这些方式已经证明了减少癫痫发作的有效性,但它们在手术侵入性、刺激目标、设备结构、规划策略和长期管理要求方面存在差异。这些差异导致不同的不良事件(AE)概况的治疗选择。在这篇综述中,我们总结了与VNS、DBS和RNS相关的ae和长期管理考虑因素,并将其分为四类:程序相关ae、刺激相关ae(包括神经精神和认知问题)、设备相关ae和长期管理考虑因素。VNS避免颅内手术,但与刺激相关的咽喉症状以及发生器和导线管理相关。DBS允许直接调节脑深部网络,但存在颅内铅植入、靶向准确性和精神或认知影响的风险。RNS提供闭环刺激和慢性颅内脑电图记录,但需要植入颅内导联和颅植入神经刺激器,定位致痫网络,以及专门的长期数据审查,编程和设备管理。在这三种模式中,与设备相关的感染、电池耗尽或更换以及持续的设备管理是常见的安全问题。了解这些特定模式的AE概况可以帮助临床医生选择候选人,为患者和家属提供咨询,并制定安全和可持续的DRE长期治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurotherapeutics
Neurotherapeutics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.50%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurotherapeutics® is the journal of the American Society for Experimental Neurotherapeutics (ASENT). Each issue provides critical reviews of an important topic relating to the treatment of neurological disorders written by international authorities. The Journal also publishes original research articles in translational neuroscience including descriptions of cutting edge therapies that cross disciplinary lines and represent important contributions to neurotherapeutics for medical practitioners and other researchers in the field. Neurotherapeutics ® delivers a multidisciplinary perspective on the frontiers of translational neuroscience, provides perspectives on current research and practice, and covers social and ethical as well as scientific issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书