Recent advances, comparative performance, and data requirements of artificial intelligence-assisted technologies for the diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Ziyang Zhang, Zhaorui Liu, Xin Zhang, Keke Lv, Yayu Huang, Chenxi Zheng, Tianlin He
{"title":"Recent advances, comparative performance, and data requirements of artificial intelligence-assisted technologies for the diagnosis of gastric cancer.","authors":"Ziyang Zhang, Zhaorui Liu, Xin Zhang, Keke Lv, Yayu Huang, Chenxi Zheng, Tianlin He","doi":"10.3389/fgstr.2026.1878353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early diagnosis of gastric cancer is critical for improving prognosis and increasing the 5-year survival rate. However, gastroscopy and pathological examination are invasive, resource-dependent, and associated with low adherence, while conventional serological and imaging screening methods have limited sensitivity for early lesions. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI), especially deep learning, has improved the efficiency and accuracy of real-time endoscopic detection, digital pathological recognition, non-contrast CT-based opportunistic screening, and multimodal diagnostic decision support. This review summarizes recent advances in AI-assisted technologies for gastric cancer diagnosis and, in response to the need for a clearer methodological and quantitative framework, compares representative models according to data modality, model architecture, dataset size, validation strategy, and reported diagnostic performance, including AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision/positive predictive value (PPV), and F1 score when available. We further discuss how data size, modality diversity, annotation granularity, class imbalance, and missing modalities influence model performance in real-world multicenter settings. Finally, we propose a structured multimodal AI-clinical decision support system (AI-CDSS) framework integrating CT imaging, endoscopic images and videos, whole-slide pathological images, serological indicators, molecular biomarkers, and clinical reports. Although AI-assisted diagnosis has shown considerable promise, clinical translation still requires prospective multicenter validation, standardized reporting of performance metrics, interpretable model outputs, privacy-preserving data governance, and regulatory-compliant deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":73085,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"5 ","pages":"1878353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13469662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgstr.2026.1878353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early diagnosis of gastric cancer is critical for improving prognosis and increasing the 5-year survival rate. However, gastroscopy and pathological examination are invasive, resource-dependent, and associated with low adherence, while conventional serological and imaging screening methods have limited sensitivity for early lesions. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI), especially deep learning, has improved the efficiency and accuracy of real-time endoscopic detection, digital pathological recognition, non-contrast CT-based opportunistic screening, and multimodal diagnostic decision support. This review summarizes recent advances in AI-assisted technologies for gastric cancer diagnosis and, in response to the need for a clearer methodological and quantitative framework, compares representative models according to data modality, model architecture, dataset size, validation strategy, and reported diagnostic performance, including AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision/positive predictive value (PPV), and F1 score when available. We further discuss how data size, modality diversity, annotation granularity, class imbalance, and missing modalities influence model performance in real-world multicenter settings. Finally, we propose a structured multimodal AI-clinical decision support system (AI-CDSS) framework integrating CT imaging, endoscopic images and videos, whole-slide pathological images, serological indicators, molecular biomarkers, and clinical reports. Although AI-assisted diagnosis has shown considerable promise, clinical translation still requires prospective multicenter validation, standardized reporting of performance metrics, interpretable model outputs, privacy-preserving data governance, and regulatory-compliant deployment.

人工智能辅助胃癌诊断技术的最新进展、比较性能和数据需求。
胃癌的早期诊断对改善预后和提高5年生存率至关重要。然而,胃镜检查和病理检查具有侵入性、资源依赖性和低依从性,而传统的血清学和影像学筛查方法对早期病变的敏感性有限。近年来,人工智能(AI),特别是深度学习,提高了实时内镜检测、数字病理识别、基于非对比ct的机会性筛查和多模态诊断决策支持的效率和准确性。本文总结了人工智能辅助胃癌诊断技术的最新进展,并根据更清晰的方法和定量框架的需要,根据数据模式、模型架构、数据集大小、验证策略和报告的诊断性能(包括AUC、准确性、敏感性、特异性、精度/阳性预测价值(PPV)和F1评分),比较了代表性模型。我们进一步讨论了数据大小、模态多样性、注释粒度、类不平衡和缺失模态如何影响真实世界多中心设置中的模型性能。最后,我们提出了一个结构化的多模式ai -临床决策支持系统(AI-CDSS)框架,集成了CT成像、内镜图像和视频、整片病理图像、血清学指标、分子生物标志物和临床报告。尽管人工智能辅助诊断已经显示出相当大的前景,但临床翻译仍然需要前瞻性的多中心验证、性能指标的标准化报告、可解释的模型输出、保护隐私的数据治理以及符合法规的部署。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书