Prenatal remote blood pressure monitoring: Impacts on blood pressure measurement and health outcomes.

Mary Reed, Jie Huang, Dayakar Beeravolu, Monique Hedderson, Andrea Millman, Mara Greenberg
{"title":"Prenatal remote blood pressure monitoring: Impacts on blood pressure measurement and health outcomes.","authors":"Mary Reed, Jie Huang, Dayakar Beeravolu, Monique Hedderson, Andrea Millman, Mara Greenberg","doi":"10.1002/pmf2.70340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Remote monitoring technology can help patients and healthcare providers to track blood pressure measurements during pregnancy to manage hypertension, but limited evidence from widespread community use is available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among pregnant patients in 2022-2023 with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, in a setting offering home blood pressure monitoring with blood pressure data collected either via weekly nurse telephone calls or digital remote upload of blood pressures with nurse calls only as-needed, we compared participant characteristics, monitoring process, and clinical outcomes between remote monitoring participants and non-remote monitoring participants using propensity weighting to account for differences between participant groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all 2750 pregnant patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, 2366 (86.0%) participated in remote monitoring. After adjustment, compared with patients with telephonic nurse monitoring of home-recorded measures, patients with remote monitoring had statistically significantly (all <i>p</i> < 0.05) fewer synchronous nurse phone calls (6.4 with remote monitoring vs. 12.6 without remote monitoring), more weeks with blood pressure readings shared with clinicians (measures on 12.7 weeks with remote monitoring vs. 8.3 weeks without remote monitoring,) and more weeks with severe hypertension captured (events on 1.08 weeks with remote monitoring vs. 0.22 weeks without remote monitoring). While the number of medication adjustments was not significantly different between monitoring types, the gestational age at first adjustment was 1.96 weeks earlier (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-3.69) in patients with remote monitoring. Emergency department visits and hospitalizations did not differ statistically significantly between monitoring groups, nor did severe maternal morbidity or cesarean or stillbirth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote blood pressure monitoring uptake and feasibility was high and was associated with higher capture of clinically actionable values, earlier medication adjustment, improved resource utilization, and similar perinatal outcomes compared with a telephone-based care model for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":520540,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"2 4","pages":"e70340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13344440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Remote monitoring technology can help patients and healthcare providers to track blood pressure measurements during pregnancy to manage hypertension, but limited evidence from widespread community use is available.

Methods: Among pregnant patients in 2022-2023 with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, in a setting offering home blood pressure monitoring with blood pressure data collected either via weekly nurse telephone calls or digital remote upload of blood pressures with nurse calls only as-needed, we compared participant characteristics, monitoring process, and clinical outcomes between remote monitoring participants and non-remote monitoring participants using propensity weighting to account for differences between participant groups.

Results: Among all 2750 pregnant patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, 2366 (86.0%) participated in remote monitoring. After adjustment, compared with patients with telephonic nurse monitoring of home-recorded measures, patients with remote monitoring had statistically significantly (all p < 0.05) fewer synchronous nurse phone calls (6.4 with remote monitoring vs. 12.6 without remote monitoring), more weeks with blood pressure readings shared with clinicians (measures on 12.7 weeks with remote monitoring vs. 8.3 weeks without remote monitoring,) and more weeks with severe hypertension captured (events on 1.08 weeks with remote monitoring vs. 0.22 weeks without remote monitoring). While the number of medication adjustments was not significantly different between monitoring types, the gestational age at first adjustment was 1.96 weeks earlier (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-3.69) in patients with remote monitoring. Emergency department visits and hospitalizations did not differ statistically significantly between monitoring groups, nor did severe maternal morbidity or cesarean or stillbirth outcomes.

Conclusions: Remote blood pressure monitoring uptake and feasibility was high and was associated with higher capture of clinically actionable values, earlier medication adjustment, improved resource utilization, and similar perinatal outcomes compared with a telephone-based care model for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

产前远程血压监测:对血压测量和健康结果的影响。
远程监测技术可以帮助患者和医疗保健提供者跟踪妊娠期间的血压测量以控制高血压,但从广泛的社区使用中获得的证据有限。方法:在2022-2023年患有妊娠高血压疾病的孕妇中,在提供家庭血压监测的环境中,通过每周一次护士电话收集血压数据,或根据需要通过护士电话收集数字远程上传血压数据,我们比较了参与者的特征、监测过程、远程监测参与者和非远程监测参与者之间的临床结果使用倾向加权来解释参与者群体之间的差异。结果:2750例妊娠期高血压疾病患者中,有2366例(86.0%)参加了远程监测。调整后,与电话护士监测家庭记录措施的患者相比,远程监测的患者具有统计学意义(均p)。结论:远程血压监测的摄取和可行性高,与基于电话的妊娠高血压疾病护理模式相比,具有更高的临床可操作值捕获,更早的药物调整,改善的资源利用率和相似的围产期结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书