Identification and analysis of critical factors influencing patient satisfaction for quality healthcare service delivery in Ghana using mixed methods.

IF 2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Selina Dussey, Sharath K M Kumar
{"title":"Identification and analysis of critical factors influencing patient satisfaction for quality healthcare service delivery in Ghana using mixed methods.","authors":"Selina Dussey, Sharath K M Kumar","doi":"10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2026-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient satisfaction is widely recognized as a key indicator of healthcare quality and system responsiveness, particularly in low- and middle-income countries pursuing Universal Health Coverage. In Ghana, despite expanded access through initiatives such as the National Health Insurance Scheme, challenges in service delivery persist. This study examined how administrative processes, clinical interactions and waiting times influence patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care. The findings seek to extend Donabedian's framework by positioning patient satisfaction as a mediating mechanism linking structural and process factors to quality outcomes. The study also examines the implications for interpersonal-centric care theories, suggesting that relational care must be supported by effective administrative and infrastructural systems, and proposes a context-specific, multidimensional model of patient satisfaction for Ghana's health system.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews. The study was carried out in both public and private facilities across Ghana's three ecological zones, capturing perspectives from both urban and rural settings. A total of 385 respondents participated, including 245 patients and 140 healthcare workers. Quantitative data were analyzed using multiple linear regression to identify predictors of satisfaction, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically to draw out key insights from patients and providers.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The results showed that the facility environment (ß = 0.553, p < 0.001) and access convenience (ß = 0.400, p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors of patient satisfaction. Waiting time negatively influenced satisfaction (ß = -0.215, p = 0.013), while administrative processes and staff attitudes also had significant effects. Qualitative findings reinforced these results, highlighting themes such as cleanliness, respectful communication, cost transparency and frustrations with delays. Interestingly, technical quality of care was not a significant predictor, pointing to a potential disconnect between professional standards and patient perceptions of quality.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>The study was conducted at selected health facilities in Ghana, and although it included diverse facility types (public, private and community-based), the findings may not fully capture the entire heterogeneity of Ghana's healthcare system. Differences across regions, facility levels and socioeconomic contexts could influence perceptions of satisfaction and quality.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>The study highlights key strategies for improving patient satisfaction through targeted service quality improvements. Administrative efficiency emerged as the strongest predictor of satisfaction, underscoring the importance of streamlined workflows, transparent communication and staff training in customer service. Quality of care remains essential, with emphasis on clinical competence, compassionate care, continuous professional development and patient-centered models. Although waiting times showed a modest influence, patient experience during delays can be improved through queue management, triage systems and waiting-area amenities. Gender differences in satisfaction suggest the need for tailored services and feedback mechanisms. Overall, policymakers and managers should prioritize administrative efficiency, quality enhancement, patient experience during waiting periods and inclusive, demographic-responsive strategies.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This study provides an in-depth, evidence-based understanding of the multiple factors shaping patient satisfaction in Ghana. It emphasizes the need to address both operational inefficiencies and interpersonal care to improve patient experience. The findings contribute to ongoing health sector reforms aimed at strengthening administrative systems, enhancing staff-patient interactions and upgrading healthcare infrastructure, especially in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47455,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2026-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patient satisfaction is widely recognized as a key indicator of healthcare quality and system responsiveness, particularly in low- and middle-income countries pursuing Universal Health Coverage. In Ghana, despite expanded access through initiatives such as the National Health Insurance Scheme, challenges in service delivery persist. This study examined how administrative processes, clinical interactions and waiting times influence patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care. The findings seek to extend Donabedian's framework by positioning patient satisfaction as a mediating mechanism linking structural and process factors to quality outcomes. The study also examines the implications for interpersonal-centric care theories, suggesting that relational care must be supported by effective administrative and infrastructural systems, and proposes a context-specific, multidimensional model of patient satisfaction for Ghana's health system.

Design/methodology/approach: A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews. The study was carried out in both public and private facilities across Ghana's three ecological zones, capturing perspectives from both urban and rural settings. A total of 385 respondents participated, including 245 patients and 140 healthcare workers. Quantitative data were analyzed using multiple linear regression to identify predictors of satisfaction, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically to draw out key insights from patients and providers.

Findings: The results showed that the facility environment (ß = 0.553, p < 0.001) and access convenience (ß = 0.400, p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors of patient satisfaction. Waiting time negatively influenced satisfaction (ß = -0.215, p = 0.013), while administrative processes and staff attitudes also had significant effects. Qualitative findings reinforced these results, highlighting themes such as cleanliness, respectful communication, cost transparency and frustrations with delays. Interestingly, technical quality of care was not a significant predictor, pointing to a potential disconnect between professional standards and patient perceptions of quality.

Research limitations/implications: The study was conducted at selected health facilities in Ghana, and although it included diverse facility types (public, private and community-based), the findings may not fully capture the entire heterogeneity of Ghana's healthcare system. Differences across regions, facility levels and socioeconomic contexts could influence perceptions of satisfaction and quality.

Practical implications: The study highlights key strategies for improving patient satisfaction through targeted service quality improvements. Administrative efficiency emerged as the strongest predictor of satisfaction, underscoring the importance of streamlined workflows, transparent communication and staff training in customer service. Quality of care remains essential, with emphasis on clinical competence, compassionate care, continuous professional development and patient-centered models. Although waiting times showed a modest influence, patient experience during delays can be improved through queue management, triage systems and waiting-area amenities. Gender differences in satisfaction suggest the need for tailored services and feedback mechanisms. Overall, policymakers and managers should prioritize administrative efficiency, quality enhancement, patient experience during waiting periods and inclusive, demographic-responsive strategies.

Originality/value: This study provides an in-depth, evidence-based understanding of the multiple factors shaping patient satisfaction in Ghana. It emphasizes the need to address both operational inefficiencies and interpersonal care to improve patient experience. The findings contribute to ongoing health sector reforms aimed at strengthening administrative systems, enhancing staff-patient interactions and upgrading healthcare infrastructure, especially in resource-limited settings.

使用混合方法识别和分析影响加纳患者对优质医疗保健服务满意度的关键因素。
目的:患者满意度被广泛认为是卫生保健质量和系统响应的关键指标,特别是在追求全民健康覆盖的低收入和中等收入国家。在加纳,尽管通过国家健康保险计划等举措扩大了获得服务的机会,但服务提供方面的挑战依然存在。本研究考察了行政流程、临床互动和等待时间如何影响患者满意度和感知护理质量。研究结果试图通过将患者满意度定位为将结构和过程因素与质量结果联系起来的中介机制来扩展Donabedian的框架。该研究还考察了以人际为中心的护理理论的含义,表明关系护理必须得到有效的行政和基础设施系统的支持,并为加纳的卫生系统提出了一个具体背景的、多维度的患者满意度模型。设计/方法/方法:采用混合方法,定量调查与定性访谈相结合。该研究在加纳三个生态区的公共和私人设施中进行,从城市和农村环境中获取观点。共有385名受访者参与调查,其中包括245名患者和140名医护人员。定量数据使用多元线性回归进行分析,以确定满意度的预测因素,而定性数据进行主题分析,以从患者和提供者中得出关键见解。研究局限性/意义:该研究是在加纳选定的卫生设施中进行的,尽管它包括不同的设施类型(公共、私人和社区),但研究结果可能不能完全反映加纳卫生保健系统的整个异质性。区域、设施水平和社会经济背景之间的差异可能影响满意度和质量的看法。实际意义:本研究强调了通过有针对性地改善服务质量来提高患者满意度的关键策略。行政效率成为满意度的最强预测指标,强调了简化工作流程、透明沟通和员工培训在客户服务方面的重要性。护理质量仍然是至关重要的,强调临床能力,富有同情心的护理,持续的专业发展和以患者为中心的模式。虽然等待时间显示出适度的影响,但患者在延误期间的体验可以通过排队管理、分诊系统和等待区设施来改善。满意度方面的性别差异表明需要有针对性的服务和反馈机制。总体而言,政策制定者和管理者应优先考虑行政效率、质量提高、等待期间的患者体验和包容性、人口响应策略。原创性/价值:本研究提供了一个深入的,基于证据的理解在加纳塑造患者满意度的多种因素。它强调需要解决操作效率低下和人际护理问题,以改善患者体验。调查结果有助于正在进行的卫生部门改革,旨在加强行政系统,加强工作人员与患者的互动和升级卫生保健基础设施,特别是在资源有限的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: ■Successful quality/continuous improvement projects ■The use of quality tools and models in leadership management development such as the EFQM Excellence Model, Balanced Scorecard, Quality Standards, Managed Care ■Issues relating to process control such as Six Sigma, Leadership, Managing Change and Process Mapping ■Improving patient care through quality related programmes and/or research Articles that use quantitative and qualitative methods are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书