Cone beam computed tomography integration in clear aligner therapy in the treatment planning of Class II division 2 malocclusion.

IF 3.2
Matthew Boubaris, Simon Freezer, Maurice Meade
{"title":"Cone beam computed tomography integration in clear aligner therapy in the treatment planning of Class II division 2 malocclusion.","authors":"Matthew Boubaris, Simon Freezer, Maurice Meade","doi":"10.2319/022126-156.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) integration on clear aligner therapy (CAT) digital treatment planning for maxillary incisors in patients with Class II division 2 malocclusion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Digital treatment plans were developed for patients using Spark Approver software (Ormco, Orange, CA, USA), with and without CBCT integration. Planned lingual root torque (LRT) and lingual root movement (LRM) were recorded from the tooth movement table for maxillary incisors that satisfied selection criteria. Predicted lingual dehiscence (PLD) and clinical parameters including number of aligners, prescribed interproximal reduction (IPR), and number of intermediate and challenging tooth movements were recorded. Inferential statistics were used to compare treatment plans developed with and without CBCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>56 maxillary incisors from 18 patients were assessed. With CBCT integration, planned LRT and LRM were significantly reduced by 51.5% and 42.4%, respectively. PLD per tooth significantly decreased from 3.7 mm (SD: 3.5) without CBCT, to 0.8 mm (SD: 1.3) with CBCT. Although no significant differences were observed in the number of aligners, prescribed IPR, or planned intermediate tooth movements, significantly fewer challenging movements were planned when CBCT was utilized.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBCT integration into CAT digital treatment planning significantly alters planned root movements, minimizes PLD, and limits challenging tooth movements. Clinicians must carefully review digital treatment plans to identify and modify planned movements that may exceed anatomical limits to ensure alveolar boundaries are respected.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/022126-156.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) integration on clear aligner therapy (CAT) digital treatment planning for maxillary incisors in patients with Class II division 2 malocclusion.

Materials and methods: Digital treatment plans were developed for patients using Spark Approver software (Ormco, Orange, CA, USA), with and without CBCT integration. Planned lingual root torque (LRT) and lingual root movement (LRM) were recorded from the tooth movement table for maxillary incisors that satisfied selection criteria. Predicted lingual dehiscence (PLD) and clinical parameters including number of aligners, prescribed interproximal reduction (IPR), and number of intermediate and challenging tooth movements were recorded. Inferential statistics were used to compare treatment plans developed with and without CBCT.

Results: 56 maxillary incisors from 18 patients were assessed. With CBCT integration, planned LRT and LRM were significantly reduced by 51.5% and 42.4%, respectively. PLD per tooth significantly decreased from 3.7 mm (SD: 3.5) without CBCT, to 0.8 mm (SD: 1.3) with CBCT. Although no significant differences were observed in the number of aligners, prescribed IPR, or planned intermediate tooth movements, significantly fewer challenging movements were planned when CBCT was utilized.

Conclusions: CBCT integration into CAT digital treatment planning significantly alters planned root movements, minimizes PLD, and limits challenging tooth movements. Clinicians must carefully review digital treatment plans to identify and modify planned movements that may exceed anatomical limits to ensure alveolar boundaries are respected.

锥束计算机断层成像在II类2分错牙合矫正器治疗计划中的应用。
目的:探讨锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)整合对II类2分错上颌切牙明确对准治疗(CAT)数字化治疗方案的影响。材料和方法:使用Spark Approver软件(Ormco, Orange, CA, USA)为患者制定数字治疗计划,包括CBCT集成和不集成。从满足选择标准的上颌切牙的牙齿运动表中记录计划舌根扭矩(LRT)和舌根运动(LRM)。记录预测的舌裂(PLD)和临床参数,包括校准器数量、规定的近端间复位(IPR)以及中间和挑战性牙齿移动数量。采用推理统计比较有CBCT和没有CBCT的治疗方案。结果:对18例患者的56颗上颌切牙进行了评估。整合CBCT后,计划LRT和LRM分别显著降低51.5%和42.4%。每颗牙齿的PLD从没有CBCT的3.7 mm (SD: 3.5)显著下降到CBCT的0.8 mm (SD: 1.3)。虽然在矫正器的数量、规定的IPR或计划的中间牙齿运动方面没有观察到显著差异,但当使用CBCT时,计划的具有挑战性的运动明显减少。结论:将CBCT整合到CAT数字化治疗计划中,可显著改变计划的牙根运动,最大限度地减少PLD,并限制具有挑战性的牙齿运动。临床医生必须仔细审查数字治疗计划,以识别和修改可能超过解剖限制的计划运动,以确保尊重肺泡边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书