Implementation barriers, facilitators, and fidelity of a mobile money-based savings tool for pregnant women in the Analamanga region of Madagascar: an ex-post process evaluation.

IF 3.5
Lisa Bogler, Sebastian Vollmer, Zavaniarivo Rampanjato, Harizaka Emmanuel Andriamasy, Bítia Vieira, Louis Noël Schäfer, Elsa Rajemison, Onja Gabrielle Ravololohanitra, Andriamampianina Ralisimalala, Till Bärnighausen, Samuel Knauss, Julius Valentin Emmrich
{"title":"Implementation barriers, facilitators, and fidelity of a mobile money-based savings tool for pregnant women in the Analamanga region of Madagascar: an ex-post process evaluation.","authors":"Lisa Bogler, Sebastian Vollmer, Zavaniarivo Rampanjato, Harizaka Emmanuel Andriamasy, Bítia Vieira, Louis Noël Schäfer, Elsa Rajemison, Onja Gabrielle Ravololohanitra, Andriamampianina Ralisimalala, Till Bärnighausen, Samuel Knauss, Julius Valentin Emmrich","doi":"10.1186/s43058-026-01055-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile payment services could improve access to obstetric care by easing saving, raising revenue, and pooling resources. Between 2019 and 2022, a mobile money-based savings tool for obstetric care was implemented in the Analamanga region of Madagascar following a randomized controlled trial design. We conducted an ex-post process evaluation of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed implementation fidelity and reach of the trial using five indicators from a population-based survey of 6,234 women who were pregnant during the intervention period and lived in catchment areas of 63 public primary-care health facilities (Centres de Santé de Base, CSBs) included in the trial: whether a woman (a) had heard of the tool, (b) could explain what it was, (c) had registered with it, (d) had used it to save, (e) had used it to pay for costs of childbirth. Combining the population-based survey with a healthcare provider survey and in-depth interviews with women, healthcare workers, and implementation staff, we examined factors associated with implementation quality, and barriers and facilitators to take-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitization led to statistically significantly higher take-up by women living in catchment areas of intervention CSBs compared to control CSBs: 39% vs 13% of surveyed women had heard of the tool, 33% vs 9% knew what it was, 15% vs 4% had registered, 15% vs 3% had saved with it and 10% vs 2% had paid with it. However, awareness and registration varied across intervention CSBs (4%-78%, 0%-54%). Key barriers to take-up included technical difficulties faced by providers, a disruption of informal benefits for providers, and mobile phone access. Learning about the tool from midwives was a facilitator.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the complexity of introducing a mobile money-based savings tool for obstetric care and the importance of evaluating implementation fidelity to understand trial impact. Strengthening community mobilization, providing more personalized support, and improving intervention compatibility with routine workflows could improve intervention delivery. User-centred design and phased roll-out allowing for continuous improvement cycles may help optimize effective implementation at scale.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The 4MOTHERS trial was registered on March 12, 2021, in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), identifier: DRKS00014928.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13474895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-026-01055-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mobile payment services could improve access to obstetric care by easing saving, raising revenue, and pooling resources. Between 2019 and 2022, a mobile money-based savings tool for obstetric care was implemented in the Analamanga region of Madagascar following a randomized controlled trial design. We conducted an ex-post process evaluation of the intervention.

Methods: We assessed implementation fidelity and reach of the trial using five indicators from a population-based survey of 6,234 women who were pregnant during the intervention period and lived in catchment areas of 63 public primary-care health facilities (Centres de Santé de Base, CSBs) included in the trial: whether a woman (a) had heard of the tool, (b) could explain what it was, (c) had registered with it, (d) had used it to save, (e) had used it to pay for costs of childbirth. Combining the population-based survey with a healthcare provider survey and in-depth interviews with women, healthcare workers, and implementation staff, we examined factors associated with implementation quality, and barriers and facilitators to take-up.

Results: Sensitization led to statistically significantly higher take-up by women living in catchment areas of intervention CSBs compared to control CSBs: 39% vs 13% of surveyed women had heard of the tool, 33% vs 9% knew what it was, 15% vs 4% had registered, 15% vs 3% had saved with it and 10% vs 2% had paid with it. However, awareness and registration varied across intervention CSBs (4%-78%, 0%-54%). Key barriers to take-up included technical difficulties faced by providers, a disruption of informal benefits for providers, and mobile phone access. Learning about the tool from midwives was a facilitator.

Conclusion: This study highlights the complexity of introducing a mobile money-based savings tool for obstetric care and the importance of evaluating implementation fidelity to understand trial impact. Strengthening community mobilization, providing more personalized support, and improving intervention compatibility with routine workflows could improve intervention delivery. User-centred design and phased roll-out allowing for continuous improvement cycles may help optimize effective implementation at scale.

Trial registration: The 4MOTHERS trial was registered on March 12, 2021, in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), identifier: DRKS00014928.

马达加斯加阿纳拉曼加地区孕妇移动货币储蓄工具的实施障碍、促进因素和保真度:事后评估
背景:移动支付服务可以通过简化储蓄、增加收入和集中资源来改善产科护理的可及性。2019年至2022年期间,根据随机对照试验设计,在马达加斯加的阿纳拉曼加地区实施了一种基于货币的产科护理移动储蓄工具。我们对干预进行了事后评估。方法:我们评估实现审判的忠诚,达到利用以人群为基础的五个指标的调查6234名怀孕妇女在干预期间,住在集水区的63所公立基层医疗卫生机构(包括中心德桑特·德·基、csb)试验中:一个女人(a)是否听说过工具,(b)可以解释它是什么,(c)注册,(d)用它来保存,(e)分娩的用它来支付费用。结合基于人口的调查与医疗保健提供者调查以及对妇女、医疗保健工作者和实施人员的深入访谈,我们检查了与实施质量相关的因素,以及实施的障碍和促进因素。结果:与对照CSBs相比,敏化导致生活在干预CSBs集水区的妇女的使用率在统计上显著提高:39%对13%的被调查妇女听说过该工具,33%对9%知道它是什么,15%对4%登记过,15%对3%用它储蓄过,10%对2%用它支付过。然而,不同干预csb的意识和登记情况各不相同(4%-78%,0%-54%)。普及的主要障碍包括供应商面临的技术困难、供应商的非正式福利中断以及移动电话接入。从助产士那里了解到这个工具是一个促进因素。结论:本研究强调了引入基于移动货币的产科护理储蓄工具的复杂性,以及评估实施保真度以了解试验影响的重要性。加强社区动员,提供更个性化的支持,改善干预措施与常规工作流程的兼容性,可以改善干预措施的实施。以用户为中心的设计和分阶段推出,允许持续的改进周期,可能有助于在规模上优化有效的实施。试验注册:4MOTHERS试验于2021年3月12日在德国临床试验注册(DRKS)注册,标识符:DRKS00014928。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书