Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Mentalizing Emotions Questionnaire.

Q2 Medicine
Ali Rahim Hallaj, Mohammad Reza Abedi, Mahdi Rahmani Malek Abad, Azam Naghavi, Zahra Asgari, Lea Amelie Kasper
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Mentalizing Emotions Questionnaire.","authors":"Ali Rahim Hallaj, Mohammad Reza Abedi, Mahdi Rahmani Malek Abad, Azam Naghavi, Zahra Asgari, Lea Amelie Kasper","doi":"10.18502/ijps.v21i2.21226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The Mentalizing Emotions Questionnaire (MEQ) assesses individuals' capacity to perceive, understand, and communicate emotional states across three dimensions: Self, Communicating, and Other. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the MEQ. <b>Method</b> <b>:</b> Two independent samples of Iranian adults participated in this research (total N = 785; 71% female). Study 1 (N = 307) conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to examine the underlying structure of the scale. Study 2 (N = 478) performed a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the three-factor model. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and divergent validity were also assessed using established measures of mentalization, empathy, alexithymia, emotional beliefs, personality functioning, and emotion regulation. <b>Results:</b> The original three-factor structure (Self, Communicating, Other) was supported. Model fit indices indicated adequate-to-good fit (CFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.07, SRMR = 0.05, CMIN/df = 3.74). The Persian MEQ demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = 0.82-0.90) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.89). Convergent validity was supported by positive correlations with mentalization and empathy measures (r = 0.20-0.35). Divergent validity was evidenced by negative correlations with alexithymia (r = -0.39), maladaptive emotional beliefs (r = -0.34), and personality functioning impairments (r = -0.31). Difficulty Describing Feelings showed a strong negative association with the Communicating dimension (r = -0.43). Cognitive reappraisal demonstrated a negative association with emotional mentalizing (r = -0.29). <b>Conclusion:</b> The Persian version of the MEQ demonstrates strong reliability and validity for assessing the mentalizing emotions in nonclinical Iranian populations. The findings also suggest potential cultural variations in the relationship between cognitive reappraisal and mentalizing emotions warranting further cross-cultural investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":38866,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"21 2","pages":"234-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13477644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v21i2.21226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Mentalizing Emotions Questionnaire (MEQ) assesses individuals' capacity to perceive, understand, and communicate emotional states across three dimensions: Self, Communicating, and Other. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the MEQ. Method : Two independent samples of Iranian adults participated in this research (total N = 785; 71% female). Study 1 (N = 307) conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to examine the underlying structure of the scale. Study 2 (N = 478) performed a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the three-factor model. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and divergent validity were also assessed using established measures of mentalization, empathy, alexithymia, emotional beliefs, personality functioning, and emotion regulation. Results: The original three-factor structure (Self, Communicating, Other) was supported. Model fit indices indicated adequate-to-good fit (CFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.07, SRMR = 0.05, CMIN/df = 3.74). The Persian MEQ demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = 0.82-0.90) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.89). Convergent validity was supported by positive correlations with mentalization and empathy measures (r = 0.20-0.35). Divergent validity was evidenced by negative correlations with alexithymia (r = -0.39), maladaptive emotional beliefs (r = -0.34), and personality functioning impairments (r = -0.31). Difficulty Describing Feelings showed a strong negative association with the Communicating dimension (r = -0.43). Cognitive reappraisal demonstrated a negative association with emotional mentalizing (r = -0.29). Conclusion: The Persian version of the MEQ demonstrates strong reliability and validity for assessing the mentalizing emotions in nonclinical Iranian populations. The findings also suggest potential cultural variations in the relationship between cognitive reappraisal and mentalizing emotions warranting further cross-cultural investigation.

波斯语版心理化情绪问卷的心理测量特性。
目的:心理情绪调查问卷(MEQ)从自我、沟通和他者三个维度评估个体感知、理解和交流情绪状态的能力。本研究旨在评估波斯语版MEQ的心理测量特性。方法:两个独立的伊朗成年人样本参与本研究(总N = 785,其中71%为女性)。研究1 (N = 307)采用探索性因素分析(EFA)来检验量表的潜在结构。研究2 (N = 478)采用验证性因子分析(CFA)对三因素模型进行检验。内部一致性、重测信度、收敛效度和发散效度也使用心智化、共情、述情障碍、情绪信念、人格功能和情绪调节等既定措施进行评估。结果:原始的三因素结构(自我、沟通、他者)得到了支持。模型拟合指标为适宜至良好(CFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.07, SRMR = 0.05, CMIN/df = 3.74)。波斯MEQ具有较强的内部一致性(α = 0.82 ~ 0.90)和良好的重测信度(ICC = 0.89)。趋同效度与心智化和共情测量呈正相关(r = 0.20-0.35)。歧异效度与述情障碍(r = -0.39)、情绪信念适应不良(r = -0.34)和人格功能障碍(r = -0.31)呈负相关。描述感受的难度与沟通维度呈现强烈的负相关(r = -0.43)。认知重评价与情绪心理化呈负相关(r = -0.29)。结论:波斯语版本的MEQ在评估非临床伊朗人群的心理情绪方面具有很强的信度和效度。研究结果还表明,认知重评价和心理化情绪之间的关系存在潜在的文化差异,需要进一步的跨文化研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书