Holmium: YAG Popcorn Lithotripsy-In Vitro Comparison of Settings and MOSES Across Stone Densities.

IF 0.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Advances in Urology Pub Date : 2026-08-13 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/aiu/3584394
Oleksandr Chepeliuk, Asaf Shvero, Rinat Lasmanovich, Lopez Isaias Caballero, Dina Orkin, A Zohar Dotan, E Dorit Zilberman, Nir Kleinmann
{"title":"Holmium: YAG Popcorn Lithotripsy-In Vitro Comparison of Settings and MOSES Across Stone Densities.","authors":"Oleksandr Chepeliuk, Asaf Shvero, Rinat Lasmanovich, Lopez Isaias Caballero, Dina Orkin, A Zohar Dotan, E Dorit Zilberman, Nir Kleinmann","doi":"10.1155/aiu/3584394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare Holmium: YAG laser settings for popcorn lithotripsy and evaluate the impact of MOSES modulation across stone-density groups.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An in vitro bench model was used with synthetic gypsum stones prepared at three density levels (low, intermediate, and high: mean attenuation was 574, 945, and 2067 HU, respectively). For each trial, five fragments (2.8-3.3 mm) were treated using popcorn technique with Holmium: YAG laser and 272 µm fiber during a 2 min run under standardized irrigation. Five laser settings (0.3 J/80 Hz, 0.5 J/40 Hz, 1.0 J/20 Hz, 1.0 J/30 Hz, and 1.5 J/20 Hz) were tested with and without MOSES mode: each setting-by-modulation condition was repeated six times. The primary endpoint was percent mass reduction; secondary endpoints were residual fragment counts 1-2 and > 2 mm. Results are presented as mean ± SD, and ANOVA was used for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the low-density group, percent mass reduction was highest overall (65%-86%), with 1.0 J/30 Hz achieving the greatest reduction, MOSES provided no additional benefit (<i>p</i> = 0.6). In the intermediate-density group, the greatest mass reduction was achieved with 1.0 J/30 Hz with MOSES (51% ± 5.9%), and MOSES effects were setting-dependent, and at 1.0 J/30 Hz MOSES reduced total residual fragments (5.3 vs 8.0, <i>p</i> = 0.04). In the high-density group, 1.0 J/30 Hz with MOSES achieved the highest mass reduction (71.5% ± 12.1%) and was associated with improved outcomes (<i>p</i> = 0.037). Secondary analyses of residual fragments generally paralleled these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this in vitro popcorn lithotripsy model, 1.0 J/30 Hz provided the most consistent performance across density groups. MOSES modulation did not improve outcomes in low-density stones but was associated with improved efficiency in intermediate- and high-density stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":7490,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Urology","volume":"2026 ","pages":"3584394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13473734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/aiu/3584394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare Holmium: YAG laser settings for popcorn lithotripsy and evaluate the impact of MOSES modulation across stone-density groups.

Materials and methods: An in vitro bench model was used with synthetic gypsum stones prepared at three density levels (low, intermediate, and high: mean attenuation was 574, 945, and 2067 HU, respectively). For each trial, five fragments (2.8-3.3 mm) were treated using popcorn technique with Holmium: YAG laser and 272 µm fiber during a 2 min run under standardized irrigation. Five laser settings (0.3 J/80 Hz, 0.5 J/40 Hz, 1.0 J/20 Hz, 1.0 J/30 Hz, and 1.5 J/20 Hz) were tested with and without MOSES mode: each setting-by-modulation condition was repeated six times. The primary endpoint was percent mass reduction; secondary endpoints were residual fragment counts 1-2 and > 2 mm. Results are presented as mean ± SD, and ANOVA was used for comparison.

Results: In the low-density group, percent mass reduction was highest overall (65%-86%), with 1.0 J/30 Hz achieving the greatest reduction, MOSES provided no additional benefit (p = 0.6). In the intermediate-density group, the greatest mass reduction was achieved with 1.0 J/30 Hz with MOSES (51% ± 5.9%), and MOSES effects were setting-dependent, and at 1.0 J/30 Hz MOSES reduced total residual fragments (5.3 vs 8.0, p = 0.04). In the high-density group, 1.0 J/30 Hz with MOSES achieved the highest mass reduction (71.5% ± 12.1%) and was associated with improved outcomes (p = 0.037). Secondary analyses of residual fragments generally paralleled these findings.

Conclusions: In this in vitro popcorn lithotripsy model, 1.0 J/30 Hz provided the most consistent performance across density groups. MOSES modulation did not improve outcomes in low-density stones but was associated with improved efficiency in intermediate- and high-density stones.

钬:YAG爆米花碎石机-体外设置和MOSES跨石密度的比较。
目的:比较Holmium: YAG激光在爆米花碎石中的设置,并评估MOSES调制对岩石密度组的影响。材料与方法:采用低、中、高三种密度(平均衰减分别为574、945、2067 HU)制备的合成石膏石体外实验台模型。在每个试验中,在标准化灌溉条件下,使用Holmium: YAG激光和272µm光纤在爆米花技术下处理5个碎片(2.8-3.3 mm),运行2 min。在有和没有MOSES模式的情况下,测试了5种激光设置(0.3 J/80 Hz、0.5 J/40 Hz、1.0 J/20 Hz、1.0 J/30 Hz和1.5 J/20 Hz),每种调制设置条件重复6次。主要终点是质量减少百分比;次要终点是残余碎片计数1-2和> 2mm。结果以均数±标准差表示,比较采用方差分析。结果:在低密度组中,总体质量减少百分比最高(65%-86%),1.0 J/30 Hz达到最大减少,MOSES没有提供额外的益处(p = 0.6)。在中密度组中,1.0 J/30 Hz的MOSES效果最大(51%±5.9%),MOSES效果与设定有关,1.0 J/30 Hz的MOSES减少了总残留碎片(5.3 vs 8.0, p = 0.04)。在高密度组中,1.0 J/30 Hz的MOSES达到了最大的质量降低(71.5%±12.1%),并与改善的结果相关(p = 0.037)。对残留碎片的二次分析大体上与这些发现相一致。结论:在体外爆米花碎石模型中,1.0 J/30 Hz在各密度组中表现最一致。MOSES调节并没有改善低密度结石的预后,但与提高中、高密度结石的疗效相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Urology
Advances in Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Urology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes state-of-the-art reviews and original research papers of wide interest in all fields of urology. The journal strives to provide publication of important manuscripts to the widest possible audience worldwide, without the constraints of expensive, hard-to-access, traditional bound journals. Advances in Urology is designed to improve publication access of both well-established urologic scientists and less well-established writers, by allowing interested scientists worldwide to participate fully.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书