Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation Practices of Adult Patients Admitted to the ICU in Japan: A 1-Day Multicenter Point-Prevalence Study.

IF 2.9 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2026-08-14 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001459
Shinya Matsushima, Tadayoshi Nonoyama, Ryosuke Matsuki, Saori Miyagishima, Masatoshi Hanada, Hiroki Sato, Yorihide Yanagita, Shin Yamada
{"title":"Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation Practices of Adult Patients Admitted to the ICU in Japan: A 1-Day Multicenter Point-Prevalence Study.","authors":"Shinya Matsushima, Tadayoshi Nonoyama, Ryosuke Matsuki, Saori Miyagishima, Masatoshi Hanada, Hiroki Sato, Yorihide Yanagita, Shin Yamada","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Early mobilization (EM) in the ICU mitigates post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and improves functional outcomes. However, comprehensive national data on mobilization practices and patient-level barriers in Japan's super-aged society remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe current mobilization and rehabilitation practices, the prevalence of EM, and factors associated with remaining in bed among adult ICU patients in Japan.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This nationwide, multicenter, cross-sectional, 1-day point-prevalence study was conducted on February 20, 2024, across ICUs in Japan. All adult patients (18 yr or older) physically present in the ICU between 00:00 and 14:00 were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The highest mobilization level was assessed using the ICU Mobility Scale (IMS). Out-of-bed mobilization was defined as IMS greater than or equal to 3, and EM as IMS greater than or equal to 3 within 48 hours of ICU admission. Patient characteristics, treatments, and perceived barriers were extracted from medical records. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with remaining in bed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected from 81 ICUs in 72 hospitals, and 693 patients were included in the analysis (median age, 72 yr; 68% 65 yr or older). Of these, 269 patients (38.8%) were receiving mechanical ventilation. Out-of-bed mobilization occurred in 42.6% of patients overall and in 17.8% of mechanically ventilated patients. EM within two days of ICU admission was achieved in 44.7% of patients overall and in 13.6% of mechanically ventilated patients. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that mechanical devices, particularly mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube, vasopressor use, sedative and analgesic administration, and coma were independently associated with a higher likelihood of remaining in bed. Conversely, the presence of delirium and higher nutritional intake were associated with a higher likelihood of achieving out-of-bed mobilization. Subjective assessments identified pathologic and psychoneurological factors as the predominant barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Despite advanced patient age, mobilization and EM rates in Japanese ICUs were comparable to those reported internationally. However, patients at the highest risk for PICS, particularly those requiring advanced organ support or intensive sedation, were the least likely to achieve out-of-bed mobilization. These findings highlight a persistent clinical dilemma and suggest the need for tailored strategies to safely expand mobilization among the most vulnerable ICU populations in super-aged societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"8 8","pages":"e1459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13475929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Early mobilization (EM) in the ICU mitigates post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and improves functional outcomes. However, comprehensive national data on mobilization practices and patient-level barriers in Japan's super-aged society remain limited.

Objectives: To describe current mobilization and rehabilitation practices, the prevalence of EM, and factors associated with remaining in bed among adult ICU patients in Japan.

Design, setting, and participants: This nationwide, multicenter, cross-sectional, 1-day point-prevalence study was conducted on February 20, 2024, across ICUs in Japan. All adult patients (18 yr or older) physically present in the ICU between 00:00 and 14:00 were included.

Main outcomes and measures: The highest mobilization level was assessed using the ICU Mobility Scale (IMS). Out-of-bed mobilization was defined as IMS greater than or equal to 3, and EM as IMS greater than or equal to 3 within 48 hours of ICU admission. Patient characteristics, treatments, and perceived barriers were extracted from medical records. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with remaining in bed.

Results: Data were collected from 81 ICUs in 72 hospitals, and 693 patients were included in the analysis (median age, 72 yr; 68% 65 yr or older). Of these, 269 patients (38.8%) were receiving mechanical ventilation. Out-of-bed mobilization occurred in 42.6% of patients overall and in 17.8% of mechanically ventilated patients. EM within two days of ICU admission was achieved in 44.7% of patients overall and in 13.6% of mechanically ventilated patients. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that mechanical devices, particularly mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube, vasopressor use, sedative and analgesic administration, and coma were independently associated with a higher likelihood of remaining in bed. Conversely, the presence of delirium and higher nutritional intake were associated with a higher likelihood of achieving out-of-bed mobilization. Subjective assessments identified pathologic and psychoneurological factors as the predominant barriers.

Conclusions and relevance: Despite advanced patient age, mobilization and EM rates in Japanese ICUs were comparable to those reported internationally. However, patients at the highest risk for PICS, particularly those requiring advanced organ support or intensive sedation, were the least likely to achieve out-of-bed mobilization. These findings highlight a persistent clinical dilemma and suggest the need for tailored strategies to safely expand mobilization among the most vulnerable ICU populations in super-aged societies.

日本ICU成年患者的早期活动和康复实践:一项为期1天的多中心点患病率研究
重要性:ICU早期活动(EM)可减轻重症监护后综合征(PICS)并改善功能预后。然而,关于日本超高龄社会动员实践和患者层面障碍的综合国家数据仍然有限。目的:描述日本成人ICU患者当前的活动和康复实践、EM的流行以及与卧床相关的因素。设计、环境和参与者:这项全国性、多中心、横断面、1天的点患病率研究于2024年2月20日在日本icu中进行。所有在00:00 - 14:00期间出现在ICU的成年患者(18岁或以上)被纳入研究。主要结果和指标:采用ICU活动能力量表(IMS)评估最高活动水平。下床活动定义为IMS大于等于3,EM定义为ICU入院48小时内IMS大于等于3。从医疗记录中提取患者特征、治疗方法和感知障碍。采用多变量logistic回归来确定与卧床相关的独立因素。结果:数据来自72家医院的81个icu, 693例患者纳入分析(中位年龄72岁,68%为65岁或以上)。其中269例(38.8%)患者接受机械通气。42.6%的患者有床外活动,17.8%的患者有机械通气。44.7%的患者和13.6%的机械通气患者在ICU入院2天内实现了EM。多变量分析表明,机械设备,特别是气管内插管机械通气、血管加压剂的使用、镇静和镇痛药物的使用以及昏迷与卧床的可能性较高独立相关。相反,谵妄和高营养摄入的存在与更高的实现床下活动的可能性相关。主观评价认为病理和神经心理因素是主要的障碍。结论和相关性:尽管患者年龄较大,但日本icu的动员率和EM率与国际上报道的相当。然而,PICS风险最高的患者,特别是那些需要高级器官支持或强化镇静的患者,最不可能实现床下活动。这些发现突出了一个持续存在的临床困境,并提示需要有针对性的策略来安全地扩大在超高龄社会中最脆弱的ICU人群中的动员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书