A Prospective, Multi-Site Study of Performance of Cell-Free DNA Testing for Recessive Conditions in a Large, General-Risk Pregnancy Population.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-13 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000006403
Eliza R McElwee, Julia Wynn, Shannon Rego, Andrew Haddad, Rachel Levan, Jennifer Hoskovec, Rebecca Crowe, Jalonna Robinson, Jesslyn Payne, Susan Shondel, Jennifer Byrnes, Kylan Hill, Jenny Wiggins-Smith, L Cristina Filetti, Stephanie Tims, Kelly Helton, Andre Hall, Jesus Alvarez Perez, Andrew S Haddad, Swati Verma, Emily E Hardisty, Jennifer L Czerwinski, Sunbola S Ashimi, Neeta L Vora, Akila Subramaniam
{"title":"A Prospective, Multi-Site Study of Performance of Cell-Free DNA Testing for Recessive Conditions in a Large, General-Risk Pregnancy Population.","authors":"Eliza R McElwee, Julia Wynn, Shannon Rego, Andrew Haddad, Rachel Levan, Jennifer Hoskovec, Rebecca Crowe, Jalonna Robinson, Jesslyn Payne, Susan Shondel, Jennifer Byrnes, Kylan Hill, Jenny Wiggins-Smith, L Cristina Filetti, Stephanie Tims, Kelly Helton, Andre Hall, Jesus Alvarez Perez, Andrew S Haddad, Swati Verma, Emily E Hardisty, Jennifer L Czerwinski, Sunbola S Ashimi, Neeta L Vora, Akila Subramaniam","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening as a primary screening tool for autosomal recessive conditions in a large, prospective, general-risk population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective analysis of pregnant individuals who underwent carrier screening with a reflex cfDNA fetal risk assessment at nine participating U.S. institutions. The conditions evaluated included cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy, and beta and alpha hemoglobinopathies. The cfDNA results were categorized as high risk (at least 1-in-4 predicted fetal risk) or low risk. Test performance metrics were calculated using Wilson Score 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2,403 cfDNA results among 2,212 pregnant carriers with singleton pregnancies at a gestational age of at least 10 weeks at participating sites (188 individuals were carriers for more than one condition). The neonatal or fetal outcome was known for 2,369 (98.6%) cfDNA results. A cfDNA fetal risk of at least 1 in 4 was returned for 1.3%, and the cfDNA fetal risk test had a specificity of 99.5%, a negative predictive value of 99.9%, a sensitivity of 94.4%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 58.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large, racially and ethnically diverse general-risk pregnant carrier sample, cfDNA fetal risk assessment accurately distinguished high-risk and low-risk pregnancies with greater PPV than traditional carrier screening, without requiring a partner sample. Combined with prior peer-reviewed studies that assessed cfDNA fetal risk screens, these findings support the possibility of cfDNA fetal risk assessment as a primary screen to identify pregnancies at high risk for autosomal recessive conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"509-515"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13574357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000006403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening as a primary screening tool for autosomal recessive conditions in a large, prospective, general-risk population.

Methods: We conducted a prospective analysis of pregnant individuals who underwent carrier screening with a reflex cfDNA fetal risk assessment at nine participating U.S. institutions. The conditions evaluated included cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy, and beta and alpha hemoglobinopathies. The cfDNA results were categorized as high risk (at least 1-in-4 predicted fetal risk) or low risk. Test performance metrics were calculated using Wilson Score 95% CIs.

Results: There were 2,403 cfDNA results among 2,212 pregnant carriers with singleton pregnancies at a gestational age of at least 10 weeks at participating sites (188 individuals were carriers for more than one condition). The neonatal or fetal outcome was known for 2,369 (98.6%) cfDNA results. A cfDNA fetal risk of at least 1 in 4 was returned for 1.3%, and the cfDNA fetal risk test had a specificity of 99.5%, a negative predictive value of 99.9%, a sensitivity of 94.4%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 58.6%.

Conclusion: In this large, racially and ethnically diverse general-risk pregnant carrier sample, cfDNA fetal risk assessment accurately distinguished high-risk and low-risk pregnancies with greater PPV than traditional carrier screening, without requiring a partner sample. Combined with prior peer-reviewed studies that assessed cfDNA fetal risk screens, these findings support the possibility of cfDNA fetal risk assessment as a primary screen to identify pregnancies at high risk for autosomal recessive conditions.

一项前瞻性的、多位点的无细胞DNA检测在一个大的、一般风险的妊娠人群中隐性条件的性能研究。
目的:评估游离DNA (cfDNA)筛查作为常染色体隐性遗传病的主要筛查工具在大范围、前瞻性、一般风险人群中的临床表现。方法:我们对美国9家参与研究的机构中接受携带者筛查和反射性cfDNA胎儿风险评估的孕妇进行了前瞻性分析。评估的条件包括囊性纤维化,脊髓性肌萎缩,以及β和α血红蛋白病。cfDNA结果被分类为高风险(至少1 / 4的预测胎儿风险)或低风险。使用Wilson评分95% ci计算测试性能指标。结果:在参与站点的2212例胎龄至少为10周的单胎妊娠孕妇中,有2403例cfDNA结果(188例为不止一种情况的携带者)。新生儿或胎儿结果已知2369 (98.6%)cfDNA结果。cfDNA胎儿风险至少为1 / 4的返回率为1.3%,cfDNA胎儿风险检测的特异性为99.5%,阴性预测值为99.9%,敏感性为94.4%,阳性预测值(PPV)为58.6%。结论:在这个大的、种族和民族多样化的一般风险妊娠携带者样本中,cfDNA胎儿风险评估比传统的携带者筛查更准确地区分了PPV更高的高风险和低风险妊娠,而不需要伴侣样本。结合之前评估cfDNA胎儿风险筛查的同行评议研究,这些发现支持将cfDNA胎儿风险评估作为确定常染色体隐性遗传病高风险妊娠的主要筛查的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书