Retrospective study on maintenance therapy with PD-1 inhibitor combined with S-1 or capecitabine after first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
American journal of cancer research Pub Date : 2026-07-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.62347/EWRN6009
Hao Yuan, Yudan Wang, Junyin Tan, Xiaomei Lin, Yan Wei
{"title":"Retrospective study on maintenance therapy with PD-1 inhibitor combined with S-1 or capecitabine after first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.","authors":"Hao Yuan, Yudan Wang, Junyin Tan, Xiaomei Lin, Yan Wei","doi":"10.62347/EWRN6009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined with S-1 or capecitabine as maintenance therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) following first-line systemic treatment. Clinical data of 95 patients diagnosed with R/M NPC were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were pathologically confirmed as having non-keratinizing undifferentiated NPC with metastatic lesions verified by imaging or pathological examination. After receiving at least 4 cycles of first-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitor combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy regimen, patients entered the maintenance stage and were divided into two groups: the combination maintenance group (PD-1 inhibitor plus S-1 or capecitabine) and the PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy maintenance group. Baseline characteristics, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), changes of Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV-DNA) load, inflammatory indicators, nutritional status indicators, quality of life scores, adverse events, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. A logistic regression model was adopted to analyze the influencing factors of poor prognosis. After maintenance treatment, the secondary ORR and DCR were slightly higher in the combination maintenance group without statistical significance (both P > 0.05). The EBV-DNA negative conversion rate was significantly elevated in the combination group (P < 0.05). Inflammatory indicators of both groups were remarkably improved after treatment (P < 0.05). No significant inter-group differences were observed in nutritional status indicators, SF-36 quality of life scores, incidence and severity distribution of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, or immune-related adverse events (all P > 0.05). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the combination maintenance group (P < 0.05). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that treatment regimen, EBV-DNA negative conversion rate and ECOG score were correlated with poor prognosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an ECOG score of 0-1 and EBV-DNA negative conversion rate were independent protective factors against poor prognosis. In conclusion, maintenance therapy with PD-1 inhibitor combined with S-1 or capecitabine after first-line treatment for R/M NPC yields definite therapeutic efficacy. The ORR and DCR showed an upward trend in the combination group, though the difference was not statistically significant. Meanwhile, this regimen can significantly elevate the EBV-DNA negative conversion rate, ameliorate systemic inflammatory responses and prolong PFS without increasing the risk of severe adverse reactions. Combined maintenance therapy did not trigger remarkable declines in most dimension scores of SF-36, and patients' overall quality of life remained relatively stable.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"16 7","pages":"2997-3009"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13468237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/EWRN6009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined with S-1 or capecitabine as maintenance therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) following first-line systemic treatment. Clinical data of 95 patients diagnosed with R/M NPC were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were pathologically confirmed as having non-keratinizing undifferentiated NPC with metastatic lesions verified by imaging or pathological examination. After receiving at least 4 cycles of first-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitor combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy regimen, patients entered the maintenance stage and were divided into two groups: the combination maintenance group (PD-1 inhibitor plus S-1 or capecitabine) and the PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy maintenance group. Baseline characteristics, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), changes of Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV-DNA) load, inflammatory indicators, nutritional status indicators, quality of life scores, adverse events, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. A logistic regression model was adopted to analyze the influencing factors of poor prognosis. After maintenance treatment, the secondary ORR and DCR were slightly higher in the combination maintenance group without statistical significance (both P > 0.05). The EBV-DNA negative conversion rate was significantly elevated in the combination group (P < 0.05). Inflammatory indicators of both groups were remarkably improved after treatment (P < 0.05). No significant inter-group differences were observed in nutritional status indicators, SF-36 quality of life scores, incidence and severity distribution of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, or immune-related adverse events (all P > 0.05). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the combination maintenance group (P < 0.05). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that treatment regimen, EBV-DNA negative conversion rate and ECOG score were correlated with poor prognosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an ECOG score of 0-1 and EBV-DNA negative conversion rate were independent protective factors against poor prognosis. In conclusion, maintenance therapy with PD-1 inhibitor combined with S-1 or capecitabine after first-line treatment for R/M NPC yields definite therapeutic efficacy. The ORR and DCR showed an upward trend in the combination group, though the difference was not statistically significant. Meanwhile, this regimen can significantly elevate the EBV-DNA negative conversion rate, ameliorate systemic inflammatory responses and prolong PFS without increasing the risk of severe adverse reactions. Combined maintenance therapy did not trigger remarkable declines in most dimension scores of SF-36, and patients' overall quality of life remained relatively stable.

复发或转移性鼻咽癌一线治疗后PD-1抑制剂联合S-1或卡培他滨维持治疗的回顾性研究
本研究旨在探讨程序性死亡-1 (PD-1)抑制剂联合S-1或卡培他滨作为复发或转移性鼻咽癌(R/M NPC)患者在一线全身治疗后维持治疗的临床疗效和安全性。回顾性分析95例R/M型鼻咽癌患者的临床资料。所有患者病理证实为非角化未分化鼻咽癌,影像学或病理检查证实有转移性病变。在接受至少4个周期的一线PD-1抑制剂联合吉西他滨+顺铂化疗方案治疗后,患者进入维持期,分为两组:联合维持组(PD-1抑制剂联合S-1或卡培他滨)和PD-1抑制剂单药治疗维持组。比较两组患者的基线特征、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、eb病毒DNA (EBV-DNA)载量变化、炎症指标、营养状况指标、生活质量评分、不良事件及生存结局。采用logistic回归模型分析影响预后不良的因素。维持治疗后,联合维持组的二次ORR和DCR略高于对照组,但无统计学意义(P均为0.05)。联合用药组EBV-DNA阴性转换率显著升高(P < 0.05)。治疗后两组炎症指标均显著改善(P < 0.05)。营养状况指标、SF-36生活质量评分、≥3级不良事件发生率及严重程度分布、免疫相关不良事件组间差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。联合维持组无进展生存期(PFS)明显延长(P < 0.05)。单因素logistic回归分析显示,治疗方案、EBV-DNA阴性转化率和ECOG评分与预后不良相关。多因素logistic回归分析显示,ECOG评分0-1分和EBV-DNA阴性转化率是预后不良的独立保护因素。总之,一线治疗后PD-1抑制剂联合S-1或卡培他滨维持治疗R/M鼻咽癌疗效明确。联合用药组的ORR和DCR均有上升趋势,但差异无统计学意义。同时,该方案可显著提高EBV-DNA阴性转化率,改善全身炎症反应,延长PFS,且不增加严重不良反应的风险。联合维持治疗并没有引起SF-36大部分维度得分的显著下降,患者整体生活质量保持相对稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书