Impact of Geriatrics Comanagement on Pain Medication Prescribing for Older Adults Across 3 Surgical Specialties: A Pre-Post Study.

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mark J Simone, Seyoun Kim, Ingrid M Nembhard, Lisa M Walke
{"title":"Impact of Geriatrics Comanagement on Pain Medication Prescribing for Older Adults Across 3 Surgical Specialties: A Pre-Post Study.","authors":"Mark J Simone, Seyoun Kim, Ingrid M Nembhard, Lisa M Walke","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older injured patients are at risk for inappropriate pain management, including undertreatment of their pain and inappropriate medication use. The primary aim of this study was to examine the impact of geriatric comanagement on pain medication prescribing in hospitalized older adults.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-site urban academic hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients aged 65 years and older admitted to orthopedic trauma, general trauma, and neurosurgery services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre-post intervention study from 2017 to 2020, using propensity score matching. We compared pain medication prescribing before and after implementation of a geriatric comanagement program. We tracked whether pain medications were received during hospitalization, and the total number of administrations per patient for each class of pain medications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2640 patients were included, and analytic sample sizes varied by outcome and subsample studied. Comanaged patients in the postintervention group were more likely to receive pain medications than the preintervention group (14.2%, 95% CI: 4.0-24.4, P=0.006), including opioids (20.1%, 95% CI: 2.5-37.6, P=0.025) and nonopioids (15.6%, 95% CI: 4.0-27.3, P=0.009). Comanaged patients had an increase in the administration of nonopioids (62.1%, P<0.001) without a significant increase in the administration of opioids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The introduction of geriatric comanagement was associated with changes in pain medication prescribing practices. While our study did not include pain outcome measures, the observed changes in pain medication prescribing add to the growing evidence supporting the benefits of geriatric comanagement models of care because appropriate prescribing facilitates pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older injured patients are at risk for inappropriate pain management, including undertreatment of their pain and inappropriate medication use. The primary aim of this study was to examine the impact of geriatric comanagement on pain medication prescribing in hospitalized older adults.

Setting: Single-site urban academic hospital.

Participants: Patients aged 65 years and older admitted to orthopedic trauma, general trauma, and neurosurgery services.

Methods: Pre-post intervention study from 2017 to 2020, using propensity score matching. We compared pain medication prescribing before and after implementation of a geriatric comanagement program. We tracked whether pain medications were received during hospitalization, and the total number of administrations per patient for each class of pain medications.

Results: A total of 2640 patients were included, and analytic sample sizes varied by outcome and subsample studied. Comanaged patients in the postintervention group were more likely to receive pain medications than the preintervention group (14.2%, 95% CI: 4.0-24.4, P=0.006), including opioids (20.1%, 95% CI: 2.5-37.6, P=0.025) and nonopioids (15.6%, 95% CI: 4.0-27.3, P=0.009). Comanaged patients had an increase in the administration of nonopioids (62.1%, P<0.001) without a significant increase in the administration of opioids.

Conclusion: The introduction of geriatric comanagement was associated with changes in pain medication prescribing practices. While our study did not include pain outcome measures, the observed changes in pain medication prescribing add to the growing evidence supporting the benefits of geriatric comanagement models of care because appropriate prescribing facilitates pain management.

老年病学管理对3种外科专科老年人止痛药处方的影响:一项前后研究。
背景:老年受伤患者存在疼痛管理不当的风险,包括疼痛治疗不足和药物使用不当。本研究的主要目的是检查老年管理对住院老年人止痛药处方的影响。环境:单站点城市学术医院。参与者:接受骨科创伤、普通创伤和神经外科服务的65岁及以上患者。方法:2017 - 2020年干预前后研究,采用倾向评分匹配法。我们比较了老年管理方案实施前后的止痛药处方。我们追踪了住院期间是否接受了止痛药,以及每名患者对每种止痛药的总用药次数。结果:共纳入2640例患者,分析样本量因结局和亚样本研究而异。干预后组的共同管理患者比干预前组更有可能接受止痛药(14.2%,95% CI: 4.0-24.4, P=0.006),包括阿片类药物(20.1%,95% CI: 2.5-37.6, P=0.025)和非阿片类药物(15.6%,95% CI: 4.0-27.3, P=0.009)。共同管理的患者非阿片类药物的使用增加了62.1%,结论:老年管理的引入与止痛药处方实践的改变有关。虽然我们的研究没有包括疼痛结果测量,但观察到的疼痛药物处方的变化增加了越来越多的证据支持老年管理模式的益处,因为适当的处方有助于疼痛管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书