The aortic window: a temporal framework for acute type A aortic dissection.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Farhin Holia, Aung Ye Oo, Colin D Bicknell, Thanos Athanasiou, Catherine Fowler, Christoph A Nienaber, Graham Cooper, Eva Göncz, John A Elefteriades, Hans-Joachim Schäfers
{"title":"The aortic window: a temporal framework for acute type A aortic dissection.","authors":"Farhin Holia, Aung Ye Oo, Colin D Bicknell, Thanos Athanasiou, Catherine Fowler, Christoph A Nienaber, Graham Cooper, Eva Göncz, John A Elefteriades, Hans-Joachim Schäfers","doi":"10.21037/acs-2026-0253-aar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a surgical emergency with time-dependent mortality. Surgical outcomes in high-volume centers are excellent, yet population-level outcomes remain catastrophic. This gap reflects a systems failure in recognition, diagnosis, and coordination rather than surgical inadequacy, and no formal time-based pathway currently governs care from emergency presentation to surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Current epidemiology, international guidelines, registry evidence, and national audit data were synthesized, together with the structure of established time-critical pathways in ST-elevation myocardial infarction, stroke, major trauma, and sepsis, and multidisciplinary and patient-and-public input, to derive a temporal framework for ATAAD. The framework is advanced as a hypothesis for formal international consensus validation rather than an empirically validated standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed framework, the aortic window, is a phased pathway from emergency-department (ED) arrival to first surgical incision, structured as RACE (four acute phases: REACH, ALERT, CONVEY, ESCALATE) and RESTORE (recovery and lifelong surveillance), and operationalized through a named activation protocol. ED-to-incision time is the principal whole-system endpoint, chosen because it captures pre-diagnosis delay that diagnosis-anchored metrics exclude. Process and outcome measures are defined at case level with scheduled network review, aligned to established national audit registries. Implementation is staged and incorporates an education and run-in period before performance assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The aortic window reframes ATAAD as a system-level, time-critical emergency amenable to the organizational solutions that improved outcomes in other time-dependent conditions. The proposed targets require prospective evaluation but provide a structured, measurable basis for coordinated pathway improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":8067,"journal":{"name":"Annals of cardiothoracic surgery","volume":"15 4","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13471113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of cardiothoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2026-0253-aar","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a surgical emergency with time-dependent mortality. Surgical outcomes in high-volume centers are excellent, yet population-level outcomes remain catastrophic. This gap reflects a systems failure in recognition, diagnosis, and coordination rather than surgical inadequacy, and no formal time-based pathway currently governs care from emergency presentation to surgery.

Methods: Current epidemiology, international guidelines, registry evidence, and national audit data were synthesized, together with the structure of established time-critical pathways in ST-elevation myocardial infarction, stroke, major trauma, and sepsis, and multidisciplinary and patient-and-public input, to derive a temporal framework for ATAAD. The framework is advanced as a hypothesis for formal international consensus validation rather than an empirically validated standard.

Results: The proposed framework, the aortic window, is a phased pathway from emergency-department (ED) arrival to first surgical incision, structured as RACE (four acute phases: REACH, ALERT, CONVEY, ESCALATE) and RESTORE (recovery and lifelong surveillance), and operationalized through a named activation protocol. ED-to-incision time is the principal whole-system endpoint, chosen because it captures pre-diagnosis delay that diagnosis-anchored metrics exclude. Process and outcome measures are defined at case level with scheduled network review, aligned to established national audit registries. Implementation is staged and incorporates an education and run-in period before performance assessment.

Conclusions: The aortic window reframes ATAAD as a system-level, time-critical emergency amenable to the organizational solutions that improved outcomes in other time-dependent conditions. The proposed targets require prospective evaluation but provide a structured, measurable basis for coordinated pathway improvement.

主动脉窗:急性a型主动脉夹层的时间框架。
背景:急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)是一种死亡率随时间变化的外科急症。大容量中心的手术结果很好,但总体水平的结果仍然是灾难性的。这一差距反映了系统在识别、诊断和协调方面的失败,而不是手术的不足,并且目前没有正式的基于时间的途径来管理从急诊到手术的护理。方法:综合当前流行病学、国际指南、注册证据和国家审计数据,结合st段抬高型心肌梗死、卒中、重大创伤和脓毒症中已建立的时间关键通路结构,以及多学科、患者和公众的输入,得出ATAAD的时间框架。该框架是作为正式国际共识验证的假设而提出的,而不是经验验证的标准。结果:提出的主动脉窗框架是一个从急诊科(ED)到达到首次手术切口的阶段性路径,结构为RACE(四个急性阶段:REACH、ALERT、CONVEY、ESCALATE)和RESTORE(恢复和终身监测),并通过命名的激活方案进行操作。edd -切口时间是整个系统的主要终点,之所以选择它,是因为它捕获了诊断前的延迟,而诊断锚定的指标则排除了这一点。过程和结果措施在个案层面确定,并与已建立的国家审计登记机构保持一致,进行定期网络审查。实施是分阶段进行的,包括在绩效评估之前的教育和磨合期。结论:主动脉窗将ATAAD重新定义为一个系统级的、时间紧迫的紧急情况,可以通过组织解决方案改善其他时间依赖性疾病的预后。拟议的目标需要前瞻性评估,但为协调的途径改进提供了一个结构化的、可衡量的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书