Cost-effectiveness of surgical and conservative interventions for orthopaedic injuries in Malawi: a modelling study.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Pakwanja Desiree Twea, Peter Hangoma, Ole Frithjof Norheim, Sven Young, Levison Chiwaula, Boston Munthali, David Watkins
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of surgical and conservative interventions for orthopaedic injuries in Malawi: a modelling study.","authors":"Pakwanja Desiree Twea, Peter Hangoma, Ole Frithjof Norheim, Sven Young, Levison Chiwaula, Boston Munthali, David Watkins","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-022014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopaedic injuries are a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in low-income settings, driven by rising urbanisation and inadequate road safety measures. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of treatment for four common orthopaedic injuries in Malawi: femoral shaft fractures, patellar fractures, humeral shaft fractures and paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures (PSCHF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a dynamic state-transition model to simulate fatal and non-fatal outcomes from a healthcare perspective from 2021 to 2031, informed by cost, epidemiological and population estimates. We estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for conservative and surgical management versus no treatment and each other, conducting one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. We then modelled the population impact of scaling up the most cost-effective intervention under two scenarios.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>For femoral shaft fractures, surgical, conservative and no treatment resulted in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of 0.10, 0.21 and 0.23, with ICERs of approximately US$3000 and US$60 000 for surgical and conservative treatment. For patellar fractures, DALYs were 0.20, 0.22 and 0.32, with similar cost-effectiveness (ICERs of US$1400). For humeral shaft fractures, DALYs were 0.041, 0.056 and 0.11, with ICERs of US$3000 and US$1400. For PSCHF, DALYs were 0.04, 0.086 and 0.14, with ICERs of US$1600 and US$2600. Comparison of surgical and conservative strategies shows surgery was cost-saving for femoral shaft fractures, similar for patellar fractures, less efficient for humeral shaft fractures and more cost-effective for PSCHF. At Malawi's willingness-to-pay threshold of US$65 per DALY averted, the probability of cost-effectiveness was low. Under the ambitious scale-up scenario, approximately 1800 DALYs (a 10% reduction relative to the baseline) were averted at an incremental cost of US$5 million.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Malawi, surgery is more cost-effective for femoral shaft and PSCHF fractures, whereas conservative care is more cost-effective for humeral shaft fractures. For patella fractures with an intact extensor mechanism, both treatments are similarly cost-effective. Targeted scale-up could yield substantial health gains, underscoring the importance of context-specific data for prioritising orthopaedic services in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"11 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13479495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-022014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orthopaedic injuries are a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in low-income settings, driven by rising urbanisation and inadequate road safety measures. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of treatment for four common orthopaedic injuries in Malawi: femoral shaft fractures, patellar fractures, humeral shaft fractures and paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures (PSCHF).

Methods: We developed a dynamic state-transition model to simulate fatal and non-fatal outcomes from a healthcare perspective from 2021 to 2031, informed by cost, epidemiological and population estimates. We estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for conservative and surgical management versus no treatment and each other, conducting one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. We then modelled the population impact of scaling up the most cost-effective intervention under two scenarios.

Findings: For femoral shaft fractures, surgical, conservative and no treatment resulted in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of 0.10, 0.21 and 0.23, with ICERs of approximately US$3000 and US$60 000 for surgical and conservative treatment. For patellar fractures, DALYs were 0.20, 0.22 and 0.32, with similar cost-effectiveness (ICERs of US$1400). For humeral shaft fractures, DALYs were 0.041, 0.056 and 0.11, with ICERs of US$3000 and US$1400. For PSCHF, DALYs were 0.04, 0.086 and 0.14, with ICERs of US$1600 and US$2600. Comparison of surgical and conservative strategies shows surgery was cost-saving for femoral shaft fractures, similar for patellar fractures, less efficient for humeral shaft fractures and more cost-effective for PSCHF. At Malawi's willingness-to-pay threshold of US$65 per DALY averted, the probability of cost-effectiveness was low. Under the ambitious scale-up scenario, approximately 1800 DALYs (a 10% reduction relative to the baseline) were averted at an incremental cost of US$5 million.

Conclusion: In Malawi, surgery is more cost-effective for femoral shaft and PSCHF fractures, whereas conservative care is more cost-effective for humeral shaft fractures. For patella fractures with an intact extensor mechanism, both treatments are similarly cost-effective. Targeted scale-up could yield substantial health gains, underscoring the importance of context-specific data for prioritising orthopaedic services in low-resource settings.

马拉维骨科损伤手术和保守干预的成本效益:一项模型研究。
背景:由于城市化程度的提高和道路安全措施的不足,骨科损伤是低收入地区发病率和死亡率的主要原因。本研究评估了马拉维四种常见骨科损伤治疗的成本效益:股骨干骨折、髌骨骨折、肱骨骨干骨折和小儿肱骨髁上骨折(PSCHF)。方法:根据成本、流行病学和人口估计,我们开发了一个动态状态转换模型,从医疗保健的角度模拟2021年至2031年的致命和非致命结果。我们估计了保守治疗和手术治疗相对于不治疗的增量成本-效果比(ICER),并进行了单向和概率敏感性分析。然后,我们在两种情况下模拟了扩大最具成本效益的干预措施对人口的影响。结果:对于股骨干骨折,手术、保守和不治疗导致残疾调整生命年(DALYs)分别为0.10、0.21和0.23,手术和保守治疗的ICERs分别为3000美元和6万美元。髌骨骨折的DALYs分别为0.20、0.22和0.32,成本-效果相似(ICERs为1400美元)。肱骨干骨折的DALYs分别为0.041、0.056和0.11,icer分别为3000美元和1400美元。PSCHF的DALYs分别为0.04、0.086和0.14,icer分别为1600美元和2600美元。手术治疗和保守治疗的比较表明,手术治疗股骨干骨折成本较低,髌骨骨折成本相似,肱骨骨干骨折成本较低,PSCHF成本较低。马拉维的支付意愿阈值为每个可避免的残疾调整年65美元,因此产生成本效益的可能性很低。在雄心勃勃的扩大方案下,以500万美元的增量成本避免了大约1800个DALYs(相对于基线减少10%)。结论:在马拉维,手术治疗股骨干和PSCHF骨折更具成本效益,而保守治疗肱骨骨干骨折更具成本效益。对于具有完整伸肌机制的髌骨骨折,两种治疗方法的成本效益相似。有针对性的扩大可产生实质性的健康收益,强调了在低资源环境中,根据具体情况确定骨科服务优先次序的数据的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书