Iben E. Giese, Stine Hangaard, Niels V. Hartvig, Irl B. Hirsch, Morten H. Jensen, Simon L. Cichosz
{"title":"Glucose in Motion: Characterizing Temporal Patterns in Real-World Glycemic Control in a Large Observational Cohort","authors":"Iben E. Giese, Stine Hangaard, Niels V. Hartvig, Irl B. Hirsch, Morten H. Jensen, Simon L. Cichosz","doi":"10.2337/dc26-0886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE To identify and characterize daily and weekly patterns in glycemic management in longitudinal real-world continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from people with diabetes to enhance clinical interpretation and support more effective personalized diabetes management. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This observational, retrospective study used two independent, multiyear, real-world CGM cohorts (T1DiabetesGranada and Connected Pen), comprising 86,779 participants with diabetes. Their mean age (SD) was 40.3 (15.8) and 44.0 (15.9), respectively, and there was a total of 21,011,021 measurement days. Weekly variations in CGM metrics and bolus insulin dose were examined using linear mixed-effects models, and daily temporal patterns were assessed. RESULTS Weekly and daily glycemic patterns emerged. Mid-week time in range was consistently higher (e.g., Wednesday: +0.96 percentage points [%-points]; 95% CI 0.93–0.99; P < 0.001), with deterioration during weekends and Mondays (e.g., Sunday: –1.74%-points; 95% CI –1.77, –1.72; P < 0.001), mirrored by shifts in other CGM metrics. Bolus insulin dose increased on weekend days (e.g., Sunday: +0.69 units; 95% CI 0.64–0.74; P < 0.001). Daily analyses revealed distinct diurnal profiles, with the most favorable glycemic control during morning and midday hours on weekdays and consistently poorer control during evening and nighttime periods, particularly on weekends. CONCLUSIONS Daily and weekly glycemic patterns revealed statistically robust and consistent temporal variations in glycemic control across two large real-world cohorts. Although the magnitude of these differences was small, the findings provide novel population-level evidence and underscore the value of longer-term CGM perspectives in routine care.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc26-0886","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and characterize daily and weekly patterns in glycemic management in longitudinal real-world continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from people with diabetes to enhance clinical interpretation and support more effective personalized diabetes management. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This observational, retrospective study used two independent, multiyear, real-world CGM cohorts (T1DiabetesGranada and Connected Pen), comprising 86,779 participants with diabetes. Their mean age (SD) was 40.3 (15.8) and 44.0 (15.9), respectively, and there was a total of 21,011,021 measurement days. Weekly variations in CGM metrics and bolus insulin dose were examined using linear mixed-effects models, and daily temporal patterns were assessed. RESULTS Weekly and daily glycemic patterns emerged. Mid-week time in range was consistently higher (e.g., Wednesday: +0.96 percentage points [%-points]; 95% CI 0.93–0.99; P < 0.001), with deterioration during weekends and Mondays (e.g., Sunday: –1.74%-points; 95% CI –1.77, –1.72; P < 0.001), mirrored by shifts in other CGM metrics. Bolus insulin dose increased on weekend days (e.g., Sunday: +0.69 units; 95% CI 0.64–0.74; P < 0.001). Daily analyses revealed distinct diurnal profiles, with the most favorable glycemic control during morning and midday hours on weekdays and consistently poorer control during evening and nighttime periods, particularly on weekends. CONCLUSIONS Daily and weekly glycemic patterns revealed statistically robust and consistent temporal variations in glycemic control across two large real-world cohorts. Although the magnitude of these differences was small, the findings provide novel population-level evidence and underscore the value of longer-term CGM perspectives in routine care.
目的:从糖尿病患者的真实世界连续血糖监测(CGM)数据中识别和描述每日和每周血糖管理模式,以加强临床解释和支持更有效的个性化糖尿病管理。研究设计和方法:这项观察性、回顾性研究使用了两个独立的、多年的、真实的CGM队列(T1DiabetesGranada和Connected Pen),包括86779名糖尿病患者。平均年龄(SD)分别为40.3(15.8)和44.0(15.9),共21,011,021测量天。使用线性混合效应模型检查CGM指标和胰岛素剂量的每周变化,并评估每日时间模式。结果:出现了每周和每日血糖模式。周中时间范围持续较高(例如,周三:+0.96个百分点[%-points]; 95% CI 0.93-0.99; P < 0.001),周末和周一恶化(例如,周日:- 1.74%;95% CI -1.77, -1.72; P < 0.001),反映在其他CGM指标的变化中。周末胰岛素剂量增加(例如,周日:+0.69单位;95% CI 0.64-0.74; P < 0.001)。每日分析显示出不同的昼夜特征,在工作日的早晨和中午血糖控制最有利,而在晚上和夜间,尤其是周末,血糖控制一直较差。结论:每日和每周血糖模式揭示了两个大型现实世界队列中血糖控制的统计稳健和一致的时间变化。尽管这些差异的幅度很小,但研究结果提供了新的人群水平证据,并强调了CGM在常规护理中的长期价值。
期刊介绍:
The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes.
Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.