Beyond Health Outcomes: Broader Societal Impacts in Economic Evaluations of Type 1 Diabetes Technologies

IF 22.6 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes Care Pub Date : 2026-08-17 DOI:10.2337/dci26-0027
Faith Ross, Maddalena Ferranna, Jee H. Choe, Daniel Tortorice, Ella Zomer, Sophia Zoungas, Anthony Pease, Jeffrey W. Cannon, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Yvonne Zurynski, Tony Huynh, Jennifer Couper, Timothy W. Jones, Elizabeth Davis, David E. Bloom
{"title":"Beyond Health Outcomes: Broader Societal Impacts in Economic Evaluations of Type 1 Diabetes Technologies","authors":"Faith Ross, Maddalena Ferranna, Jee H. Choe, Daniel Tortorice, Ella Zomer, Sophia Zoungas, Anthony Pease, Jeffrey W. Cannon, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Yvonne Zurynski, Tony Huynh, Jennifer Couper, Timothy W. Jones, Elizabeth Davis, David E. Bloom","doi":"10.2337/dci26-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Type 1 diabetes imposes a significant burden through morbidity, mortality, and high health care costs while also generating additional health, economic, and social costs, ranging from mental health conditions to risk of financial hardship to social stigma. Many of these outcomes may also spill over to families and caregivers. The economic literature increasingly recognizes the importance of including broader societal impacts in economic evaluations, including some guidelines for assessment of health interventions. However, in practice, societal impacts are incorporated in a limited way in assessments of type 1 diabetes therapies, most commonly through certain productivity-related measures, with limited consideration of broader impacts. In this article, we review the wider impacts of type 1 diabetes and examine how recent evaluations of novel technologies apply different perspectives. We find that economic assessments inconsistently incorporate broader societal impacts, such as psychosocial effects, informal caregiving, and long-term economic consequences. Consideration of a broader range of societal impacts may provide a more comprehensive evidence base for evaluating type 1 diabetes treatments and technologies, including in decisions related to their development, distribution, and reimbursement.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dci26-0027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes imposes a significant burden through morbidity, mortality, and high health care costs while also generating additional health, economic, and social costs, ranging from mental health conditions to risk of financial hardship to social stigma. Many of these outcomes may also spill over to families and caregivers. The economic literature increasingly recognizes the importance of including broader societal impacts in economic evaluations, including some guidelines for assessment of health interventions. However, in practice, societal impacts are incorporated in a limited way in assessments of type 1 diabetes therapies, most commonly through certain productivity-related measures, with limited consideration of broader impacts. In this article, we review the wider impacts of type 1 diabetes and examine how recent evaluations of novel technologies apply different perspectives. We find that economic assessments inconsistently incorporate broader societal impacts, such as psychosocial effects, informal caregiving, and long-term economic consequences. Consideration of a broader range of societal impacts may provide a more comprehensive evidence base for evaluating type 1 diabetes treatments and technologies, including in decisions related to their development, distribution, and reimbursement.
超越健康结果:1型糖尿病技术经济评估中更广泛的社会影响
1型糖尿病通过发病率、死亡率和高昂的医疗费用造成了重大负担,同时也产生了额外的健康、经济和社会成本,从精神健康状况到经济困难的风险,再到社会耻辱。其中许多结果也可能波及到家庭和照顾者。经济文献日益认识到在经济评价中纳入更广泛的社会影响的重要性,包括卫生干预措施评估的一些准则。然而,在实践中,在1型糖尿病治疗的评估中,社会影响以有限的方式被纳入,最常见的是通过某些与生产力相关的措施,很少考虑更广泛的影响。在本文中,我们回顾了1型糖尿病的广泛影响,并研究了最近对新技术的评估如何应用不同的观点。我们发现,经济评估不一致地纳入了更广泛的社会影响,如心理社会影响、非正式照顾和长期经济后果。考虑更广泛的社会影响可能会为评估1型糖尿病治疗和技术提供更全面的证据基础,包括与它们的开发、分配和报销相关的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Care
Diabetes Care 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
27.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
449
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes. Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书