Faith Ross, Maddalena Ferranna, Jee H. Choe, Daniel Tortorice, Ella Zomer, Sophia Zoungas, Anthony Pease, Jeffrey W. Cannon, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Yvonne Zurynski, Tony Huynh, Jennifer Couper, Timothy W. Jones, Elizabeth Davis, David E. Bloom
{"title":"Beyond Health Outcomes: Broader Societal Impacts in Economic Evaluations of Type 1 Diabetes Technologies","authors":"Faith Ross, Maddalena Ferranna, Jee H. Choe, Daniel Tortorice, Ella Zomer, Sophia Zoungas, Anthony Pease, Jeffrey W. Cannon, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Yvonne Zurynski, Tony Huynh, Jennifer Couper, Timothy W. Jones, Elizabeth Davis, David E. Bloom","doi":"10.2337/dci26-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Type 1 diabetes imposes a significant burden through morbidity, mortality, and high health care costs while also generating additional health, economic, and social costs, ranging from mental health conditions to risk of financial hardship to social stigma. Many of these outcomes may also spill over to families and caregivers. The economic literature increasingly recognizes the importance of including broader societal impacts in economic evaluations, including some guidelines for assessment of health interventions. However, in practice, societal impacts are incorporated in a limited way in assessments of type 1 diabetes therapies, most commonly through certain productivity-related measures, with limited consideration of broader impacts. In this article, we review the wider impacts of type 1 diabetes and examine how recent evaluations of novel technologies apply different perspectives. We find that economic assessments inconsistently incorporate broader societal impacts, such as psychosocial effects, informal caregiving, and long-term economic consequences. Consideration of a broader range of societal impacts may provide a more comprehensive evidence base for evaluating type 1 diabetes treatments and technologies, including in decisions related to their development, distribution, and reimbursement.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dci26-0027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes imposes a significant burden through morbidity, mortality, and high health care costs while also generating additional health, economic, and social costs, ranging from mental health conditions to risk of financial hardship to social stigma. Many of these outcomes may also spill over to families and caregivers. The economic literature increasingly recognizes the importance of including broader societal impacts in economic evaluations, including some guidelines for assessment of health interventions. However, in practice, societal impacts are incorporated in a limited way in assessments of type 1 diabetes therapies, most commonly through certain productivity-related measures, with limited consideration of broader impacts. In this article, we review the wider impacts of type 1 diabetes and examine how recent evaluations of novel technologies apply different perspectives. We find that economic assessments inconsistently incorporate broader societal impacts, such as psychosocial effects, informal caregiving, and long-term economic consequences. Consideration of a broader range of societal impacts may provide a more comprehensive evidence base for evaluating type 1 diabetes treatments and technologies, including in decisions related to their development, distribution, and reimbursement.
期刊介绍:
The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes.
Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.