A call-out for AAC professional development training: Special education teachers speak-up

IF 1.8 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Miriam C. Boesch, M. Alexandra Da Fonte, Hanneh S. Shiheiber, Margaret F. Davis, Stephanie Camacho, Kate E. Ulmer, Barbara N. De La Pena, Grace O. May
{"title":"A call-out for AAC professional development training: Special education teachers speak-up","authors":"Miriam C. Boesch,&nbsp;M. Alexandra Da Fonte,&nbsp;Hanneh S. Shiheiber,&nbsp;Margaret F. Davis,&nbsp;Stephanie Camacho,&nbsp;Kate E. Ulmer,&nbsp;Barbara N. De La Pena,&nbsp;Grace O. May","doi":"10.1111/1471-3802.70158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evidence suggests that special education teachers are not well-prepared to implement services for students who may benefit from augmentative and alternative communication. The lack of training often emerges during their pre-service teacher preparation programs. To alleviate the knowledge gap, special education teachers may rely on professional development training opportunities. As a result, to better understand the perspectives of special education teachers on the state of AAC professional development training an online survey was conducted across the United States. A total of 772 special education teachers provided their views through five identified themes. These included that AAC professional development ‘training is available,’ there is a ‘need for training,’ there are ‘systemic barriers’ to training, ‘team support’ was used as a means for training, and participants were ‘unclear or did not know’ if AAC professional development training was available. Results suggested that most participants indicated that AAC professional development training is lacking, and that training is needed. Various influencing factors were identified between participants' demographics and their views on AAC professional development training. Practical implications, a call to action and future research directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-3802.70158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence suggests that special education teachers are not well-prepared to implement services for students who may benefit from augmentative and alternative communication. The lack of training often emerges during their pre-service teacher preparation programs. To alleviate the knowledge gap, special education teachers may rely on professional development training opportunities. As a result, to better understand the perspectives of special education teachers on the state of AAC professional development training an online survey was conducted across the United States. A total of 772 special education teachers provided their views through five identified themes. These included that AAC professional development ‘training is available,’ there is a ‘need for training,’ there are ‘systemic barriers’ to training, ‘team support’ was used as a means for training, and participants were ‘unclear or did not know’ if AAC professional development training was available. Results suggested that most participants indicated that AAC professional development training is lacking, and that training is needed. Various influencing factors were identified between participants' demographics and their views on AAC professional development training. Practical implications, a call to action and future research directions are discussed.

AAC专业发展培训的号召:特殊教育教师发言
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs (JORSEN) is an established online forum for the dissemination of international research on special educational needs. JORSEN aims to: Publish original research, literature reviews and theoretical papers on meeting special educational needs Create an international forum for researchers to reflect on, and share ideas regarding, issues of particular importance to them such as methodology, research design and ethical issues Reach a wide multi-disciplinary national and international audience through online publication Authors are invited to submit reports of original research, reviews of research and scholarly papers on methodology, research design and ethical issues. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs will provide essential reading for those working in the special educational needs field wherever that work takes place around the world. It will be of particular interest to those working in: Research Teaching and learning support Policymaking Administration and supervision Educational psychology Advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书