{"title":"Mars' Dayside Induced Magnetosphere Under Quasi-Radial Interplanetary Magnetic Field—A MHD Model Study","authors":"Yihui Song, Haoyu Lu, Jinbin Cao, Shibang Li, Xiaoshu Wu, Jianxuan Wang, Nihan Chen, Yasong Ge, Yuchen Cao, Jianing Zhao","doi":"10.1029/2026JE009816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) is one of the important external drivers that control the Martian plasma environment. There is some controversy about the characteristics of the Martian plasma environment under radial IMF conditions. Utilizing a three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model, this study analyzes the impact of IMF cone angle on the electromagnetic field and ion motions in Martian space, and investigates the Martian space environment under radial IMF conditions. Simulation results indicate that the decrease in IMF cone angle weakens the electromagnetic fields. The reduction in magnetic field pile-up leads to a weakened induced magnetosphere. Therefore, solar wind protons experience less deceleration and deflection across the bow shock (BS), which is compressed to lower altitudes. Under radial IMF, though the electric fields that impede the penetration of solar wind particles are weak on the dayside, the BS, the magnetosheath, and the induced magnetosphere structure can still form, and the pile-up of magnetic fields can still be observed. In contrast to previous reports of BS disappearance under radial IMF, our simulations show that a BS and a structured magnetosheath persist even at extremely small cone angles. These results help reconcile conflicting observations and provide constraints for interpreting MAVEN measurements during near-radial IMF intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"131 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026JE009816","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) is one of the important external drivers that control the Martian plasma environment. There is some controversy about the characteristics of the Martian plasma environment under radial IMF conditions. Utilizing a three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model, this study analyzes the impact of IMF cone angle on the electromagnetic field and ion motions in Martian space, and investigates the Martian space environment under radial IMF conditions. Simulation results indicate that the decrease in IMF cone angle weakens the electromagnetic fields. The reduction in magnetic field pile-up leads to a weakened induced magnetosphere. Therefore, solar wind protons experience less deceleration and deflection across the bow shock (BS), which is compressed to lower altitudes. Under radial IMF, though the electric fields that impede the penetration of solar wind particles are weak on the dayside, the BS, the magnetosheath, and the induced magnetosphere structure can still form, and the pile-up of magnetic fields can still be observed. In contrast to previous reports of BS disappearance under radial IMF, our simulations show that a BS and a structured magnetosheath persist even at extremely small cone angles. These results help reconcile conflicting observations and provide constraints for interpreting MAVEN measurements during near-radial IMF intervals.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.