Uptake and Evaluation of a Crosslinguistic Nonword Repetition Test in Clinical and Research Contexts

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Kamila Polišenská, Shula Chiat
{"title":"Uptake and Evaluation of a Crosslinguistic Nonword Repetition Test in Clinical and Research Contexts","authors":"Kamila Polišenská,&nbsp;Shula Chiat","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The Crosslinguistic Nonword Repetition Test (CL-NWR) was designed to accommodate the phonological diversity of human languages, providing a tool that may support the identification of Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) across different linguistic backgrounds. The test materials, including a PowerPoint game with recorded stimuli, administration guidelines, and scoring instructions, were available upon request. This study examines the uptake and application of the CL-NWR in clinical and research settings through a survey of individuals who have accessed the materials. The survey covered three main areas: (i) participant demographics; (ii) experience of using the CL-NWR task; and (iii) views on administration and scoring of the CL-NWR task.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We explored views of CL-NWR users through an online survey delivered through the Qualtrics platform and distributed to 156 individuals who had requested CL-NWR materials up to November 2024. Follow-up reminders were sent at one- and two-week intervals to maximise response rates. Response formats included yes/no, multiple choice, Likert scales and open-ended text responses. Survey data were analysed through descriptive statistics and content analysis of open-ended questions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 109 respondents from 36 countries completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 70%. The test was most commonly used with multilingual children and those with suspected DLD. Notably, 92% of respondents indicated that the CL-NWR made a valuable contribution to their assessments. Qualitative responses highlighted its practical benefits as well as areas for refinement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The high response rate and overwhelmingly positive feedback suggest a high level of engagement and interest in the CL-NWR, particularly in multilingual populations. These findings will inform future developments of the CL-NWR test, ensuring its continued relevance and effectiveness in both clinical and research applications. The study also underscores the value of crosslinguistic tools in supporting equitable language assessment worldwide.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <div><i>What is already known on this subject</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>Nonword repetition tasks are widely used to support the identification of Developmental Language Disorder across languages. The Crosslinguistic Nonword Repetition Test (CL-NWR) was developed as a language-neutral tool for multilingual populations, and a growing body of research has reported findings from diverse samples using the task. However, its uptake, usability, and application in clinical and research settings have not yet been systematically evaluated.</li>\n </ul><i>What this study adds to existing knowledge</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>This study provides the first large-scale evidence of global uptake and application of the CL-NWR across clinical and research contexts. Findings show high levels of use, particularly with multilingual children, and strong perceived value in assessment. The results highlight both the practical utility of the tool and areas for further development.</li>\n </ul><i>What are the clinical implications of this study?</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>The CL-NWR is a feasible and valuable tool for supporting language assessment, particularly in linguistically diverse populations. The identified need for clearer guidance on administration, scoring, and developmental norms has informed the provision of additional materials and access instructions, supporting more consistent and informed use in clinical and research practice.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"61 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70306","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Crosslinguistic Nonword Repetition Test (CL-NWR) was designed to accommodate the phonological diversity of human languages, providing a tool that may support the identification of Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) across different linguistic backgrounds. The test materials, including a PowerPoint game with recorded stimuli, administration guidelines, and scoring instructions, were available upon request. This study examines the uptake and application of the CL-NWR in clinical and research settings through a survey of individuals who have accessed the materials. The survey covered three main areas: (i) participant demographics; (ii) experience of using the CL-NWR task; and (iii) views on administration and scoring of the CL-NWR task.

Methods

We explored views of CL-NWR users through an online survey delivered through the Qualtrics platform and distributed to 156 individuals who had requested CL-NWR materials up to November 2024. Follow-up reminders were sent at one- and two-week intervals to maximise response rates. Response formats included yes/no, multiple choice, Likert scales and open-ended text responses. Survey data were analysed through descriptive statistics and content analysis of open-ended questions.

Results

A total of 109 respondents from 36 countries completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 70%. The test was most commonly used with multilingual children and those with suspected DLD. Notably, 92% of respondents indicated that the CL-NWR made a valuable contribution to their assessments. Qualitative responses highlighted its practical benefits as well as areas for refinement.

Conclusion

The high response rate and overwhelmingly positive feedback suggest a high level of engagement and interest in the CL-NWR, particularly in multilingual populations. These findings will inform future developments of the CL-NWR test, ensuring its continued relevance and effectiveness in both clinical and research applications. The study also underscores the value of crosslinguistic tools in supporting equitable language assessment worldwide.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on this subject
  • Nonword repetition tasks are widely used to support the identification of Developmental Language Disorder across languages. The Crosslinguistic Nonword Repetition Test (CL-NWR) was developed as a language-neutral tool for multilingual populations, and a growing body of research has reported findings from diverse samples using the task. However, its uptake, usability, and application in clinical and research settings have not yet been systematically evaluated.
What this study adds to existing knowledge
  • This study provides the first large-scale evidence of global uptake and application of the CL-NWR across clinical and research contexts. Findings show high levels of use, particularly with multilingual children, and strong perceived value in assessment. The results highlight both the practical utility of the tool and areas for further development.
What are the clinical implications of this study?
  • The CL-NWR is a feasible and valuable tool for supporting language assessment, particularly in linguistically diverse populations. The identified need for clearer guidance on administration, scoring, and developmental norms has informed the provision of additional materials and access instructions, supporting more consistent and informed use in clinical and research practice.
跨语言非词重复测试在临床和研究中的应用与评价
跨语言非词重复测试(cross - linguistic Nonword Repetition Test, CL-NWR)旨在适应人类语言的语音多样性,为不同语言背景下的发展性语言障碍(Developmental Language Disorder, DLD)的识别提供一种工具。测试材料,包括一个带有记录刺激的PowerPoint游戏,管理指南和评分说明,可根据要求提供。本研究通过对访问过材料的个人的调查,检查了临床和研究环境中CL-NWR的吸收和应用。调查涵盖三个主要领域:(i)参与者人口统计;(ii)使用CL-NWR任务的经验;以及(iii)对CL-NWR任务的执行和评分的意见。方法通过qualics平台提供的在线调查,我们探索了CL-NWR用户的观点,并向156名申请CL-NWR材料的个人分发了截至2024年11月。后续提醒每隔一到两周发送一次,以最大限度地提高响应率。回答格式包括是/否、多项选择、李克特量表和开放式文本回答。通过描述性统计和开放式问题的内容分析对调查数据进行分析。结果共有来自36个国家的109名受访者完成了调查,回复率为70%。该测试最常用于多语种儿童和疑似DLD的儿童。值得注意的是,92%的受访者表示,CL-NWR对他们的评估做出了有价值的贡献。定性答复强调了它的实际好处以及需要改进的领域。高回复率和压倒性的积极反馈表明,人们对CL-NWR有很高的参与度和兴趣,特别是在多语言人群中。这些发现将为CL-NWR测试的未来发展提供信息,确保其在临床和研究应用中的持续相关性和有效性。该研究还强调了跨语言工具在支持全球公平语言评估方面的价值。非词重复任务被广泛用于支持跨语言发育性语言障碍的识别。跨语言非词重复测试(cross - linguistic Nonword Repetition Test, CL-NWR)是为多语言人群开发的一种语言中立工具,越来越多的研究报告了使用该任务的不同样本的结果。然而,它的吸收,可用性和应用在临床和研究设置尚未被系统地评估。这项研究提供了第一个大规模的证据,证明CL-NWR在临床和研究领域的全球吸收和应用。调查结果显示,使用水平很高,特别是对多语言儿童,并且在评估中具有很强的感知价值。结果突出了该工具的实际用途和进一步发展的领域。这项研究的临床意义是什么?CL-NWR是支持语言评估的一个可行且有价值的工具,特别是在语言多样化的人群中。已确定需要对管理、评分和发展规范提供更明确的指导,这为提供额外的材料和获取说明提供了信息,支持在临床和研究实践中更加一致和知情的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书