{"title":"Heavy metal mixtures and kidney function: multi-scale evidence from a nationally representative cohort","authors":"Xuetong Tang, Yi Cheng, Yuan Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12302-026-01378-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major global health burden, and exposure to heavy metals is increasingly recognized as a potentially modifiable risk factor.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using data from a nationally representative U.S. survey (NHANES 2011–2016), we evaluated associations between blood concentrations of seven metals (Pb, Cd, Cu, Hg, Zn, Se, Mn) and kidney outcomes—estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and CKD status. We fitted single-metal regression models and mixed-exposure models, including directional weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR). To generate mechanistic hypotheses, we performed functional enrichment and molecular docking analyses.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In single-metal models, Pb was associated with lower eGFR, and Cu was associated with higher UACR. In mixture analyses, WQS showed a positive association with UACR and (in the positive-direction model) higher eGFR, whereas the WQS association with CKD was suggestive but not statistically significant. BKMR indicated non-linear and context-dependent (co-exposure-dependent) patterns for selected metals across outcomes, and bivariate surfaces suggested potential interaction structure. Exploratory bioinformatic analyses highlighted extracellular matrix-related processes and cell–matrix signaling pathways, and docking suggested plausible metal–protein contacts for selected targets.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this cross-sectional analysis, associations between metal exposures and kidney outcomes varied by outcome metric and statistical approach, with more consistent signals for Pb–eGFR and Cu–UACR. Mixture models suggested joint-exposure patterns and potential non-linearity/interaction structure, but causal inference is limited by the cross-sectional design and single-time blood measurements; reverse causation and residual confounding remain possible. The downstream bioinformatic and docking results are hypothesis-generating and intended to prioritize pathways for future mechanistic research.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-026-01378-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-026-01378-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major global health burden, and exposure to heavy metals is increasingly recognized as a potentially modifiable risk factor.
Methods
Using data from a nationally representative U.S. survey (NHANES 2011–2016), we evaluated associations between blood concentrations of seven metals (Pb, Cd, Cu, Hg, Zn, Se, Mn) and kidney outcomes—estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and CKD status. We fitted single-metal regression models and mixed-exposure models, including directional weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR). To generate mechanistic hypotheses, we performed functional enrichment and molecular docking analyses.
Results
In single-metal models, Pb was associated with lower eGFR, and Cu was associated with higher UACR. In mixture analyses, WQS showed a positive association with UACR and (in the positive-direction model) higher eGFR, whereas the WQS association with CKD was suggestive but not statistically significant. BKMR indicated non-linear and context-dependent (co-exposure-dependent) patterns for selected metals across outcomes, and bivariate surfaces suggested potential interaction structure. Exploratory bioinformatic analyses highlighted extracellular matrix-related processes and cell–matrix signaling pathways, and docking suggested plausible metal–protein contacts for selected targets.
Conclusion
In this cross-sectional analysis, associations between metal exposures and kidney outcomes varied by outcome metric and statistical approach, with more consistent signals for Pb–eGFR and Cu–UACR. Mixture models suggested joint-exposure patterns and potential non-linearity/interaction structure, but causal inference is limited by the cross-sectional design and single-time blood measurements; reverse causation and residual confounding remain possible. The downstream bioinformatic and docking results are hypothesis-generating and intended to prioritize pathways for future mechanistic research.
期刊介绍:
ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation.
ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation.
ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation.
Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues.
Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.