Comparison of the effects of succinylcholine and atracurium on intracranial pressure in monkeys with intracranial hypertension.

J D Haigh, E M Nemoto, A M DeWolf, A L Bleyaert
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of succinylcholine and atracurium on intracranial pressure in monkeys with intracranial hypertension.","authors":"J D Haigh,&nbsp;E M Nemoto,&nbsp;A M DeWolf,&nbsp;A L Bleyaert","doi":"10.1007/BF03010965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of succinylcholine (1.5 mg X kg-1 IV) administered five minutes after a defasciculating dose of curare (0.05 mg X kg-1 IV), were compared with the effects of atracurium (0.5 mg X kg-1 IV) on intracranial pressure (ICP) in 13 cynomolgus monkeys with intracranial hypertension (ICP approximately 25 mmHg). Neither succinylcholine nor atracurium increased ICP during general anaesthesia with 60 per cent N2O/O2, 0.5-1 per cent halothane. During a rapid sequence induction and intubation with thiopentone 5 mg X kg-1 IV, ICP increased equally with intubation following both atracurium (25 +/- 1 to 32 +/- 2 mmHg) and succinylcholine (25 +/- 1 to 31 +/- 2 mmHg) (p less than 0.05). Intubation was also associated with significant increases in PaCO2, CVP and MAP. We conclude that in this primate model of intracranial hypertension, neither atracurium nor succinylcholine (when given following a defasciculating dose of curare) elevates ICP. In terms of the elevation of ICP associated with intubation, atracurium was found to offer no advantage over succinylcholine.</p>","PeriodicalId":9371,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal","volume":"33 4","pages":"421-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03010965","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03010965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The effects of succinylcholine (1.5 mg X kg-1 IV) administered five minutes after a defasciculating dose of curare (0.05 mg X kg-1 IV), were compared with the effects of atracurium (0.5 mg X kg-1 IV) on intracranial pressure (ICP) in 13 cynomolgus monkeys with intracranial hypertension (ICP approximately 25 mmHg). Neither succinylcholine nor atracurium increased ICP during general anaesthesia with 60 per cent N2O/O2, 0.5-1 per cent halothane. During a rapid sequence induction and intubation with thiopentone 5 mg X kg-1 IV, ICP increased equally with intubation following both atracurium (25 +/- 1 to 32 +/- 2 mmHg) and succinylcholine (25 +/- 1 to 31 +/- 2 mmHg) (p less than 0.05). Intubation was also associated with significant increases in PaCO2, CVP and MAP. We conclude that in this primate model of intracranial hypertension, neither atracurium nor succinylcholine (when given following a defasciculating dose of curare) elevates ICP. In terms of the elevation of ICP associated with intubation, atracurium was found to offer no advantage over succinylcholine.

琥珀胆碱与阿曲库铵对颅内高压猴子颅内压影响的比较。
本研究比较了13只患有颅内高压(ICP约为25 mmHg)的食食猴在给药curare (0.05 mg X kg-1 IV)后5分钟给药琥珀酰胆碱(1.5 mg X kg-1 IV)与阿曲库铵(0.5 mg X kg-1 IV)对颅内压(ICP)的影响。琥珀酰胆碱和阿曲库铵在60% N2O/O2、0.5% - 1%氟烷的全麻期间均未增加ICP。在快速序列诱导和硫喷妥5mg X kg-1 IV插管期间,阿曲库铵(25 +/- 1至32 +/- 2 mmHg)和琥珀胆碱(25 +/- 1至31 +/- 2 mmHg)插管后,ICP均增加(p < 0.05)。插管也与PaCO2、CVP和MAP显著升高相关。我们得出结论,在颅内高压的灵长类动物模型中,阿曲库铵和琥珀酰胆碱(在去血循环剂量curare后给予)都不会升高ICP。在与插管相关的ICP升高方面,我们发现阿曲库铵与琥珀胆碱相比没有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信