Monte Carlo-based characterization of proton minibeam radiation therapy across clinically relevant beam parameters

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Angela Corvino, Tim Schneider, Yolanda Prezado
{"title":"Monte Carlo-based characterization of proton minibeam radiation therapy across clinically relevant beam parameters","authors":"Angela Corvino,&nbsp;Tim Schneider,&nbsp;Yolanda Prezado","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2026.101032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) uses a 1D array of narrow beams to widen the therapeutic window of difficult-to-treat tumors. With the aim of identifying tumor locations that could benefit most from pMBRT, we evaluated how irradiation parameters shape 3D dose distributions.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Monte Carlo simulations were used to compute dose distributions in water for different proton energies, beam widths (bw<em>s</em>) and center-to-center distances (ctc<em>s</em>). Optimal parameter combinations were selected according to three criteria: (i) minimization of the bw in normal tissue; (ii) maximization of the valley dose in the target; and (iii) minimization of the peak dose in normal tissue.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For shallow tumors (≤ 2 cm), 0.5 mm beams with ctc = 3bw kept normal-tissue widths &lt; 1 mm with Bragg-peak-to-entrance dose ratio (BEDR) &gt; 1. For intermediate and deep-seated tumors (8–20 cm), 1.0–1.5 mm beams with ctc = 4–5bw kept normal-tissue widths &lt; 7 mm with peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) &gt; 3 and achieved lateral dose homogeneity in the target. For very deep-seated tumors (&gt; 20 cm), 2 mm beams with ctc = 4bw maintained normal-tissue widths &lt; 10 mm with PVDR &gt; 3 at the cost of BEDR ∼ 0.5.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>pMBRT may offer advantages over conventional proton therapy and GRID therapy for treating shallow and deep-seated tumors. For very deep-seated tumors (&gt; 20 cm), feasibility will depend on tumor size and proximity of organs at risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 101032"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631626001326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) uses a 1D array of narrow beams to widen the therapeutic window of difficult-to-treat tumors. With the aim of identifying tumor locations that could benefit most from pMBRT, we evaluated how irradiation parameters shape 3D dose distributions.

Materials and methods

Monte Carlo simulations were used to compute dose distributions in water for different proton energies, beam widths (bws) and center-to-center distances (ctcs). Optimal parameter combinations were selected according to three criteria: (i) minimization of the bw in normal tissue; (ii) maximization of the valley dose in the target; and (iii) minimization of the peak dose in normal tissue.

Results

For shallow tumors (≤ 2 cm), 0.5 mm beams with ctc = 3bw kept normal-tissue widths < 1 mm with Bragg-peak-to-entrance dose ratio (BEDR) > 1. For intermediate and deep-seated tumors (8–20 cm), 1.0–1.5 mm beams with ctc = 4–5bw kept normal-tissue widths < 7 mm with peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) > 3 and achieved lateral dose homogeneity in the target. For very deep-seated tumors (> 20 cm), 2 mm beams with ctc = 4bw maintained normal-tissue widths < 10 mm with PVDR > 3 at the cost of BEDR ∼ 0.5.

Conclusion

pMBRT may offer advantages over conventional proton therapy and GRID therapy for treating shallow and deep-seated tumors. For very deep-seated tumors (> 20 cm), feasibility will depend on tumor size and proximity of organs at risk.
基于蒙特卡罗的质子微束放射治疗的临床相关光束参数表征
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书