Concentration-QTc modeling provides consistent high QTc sensitivity across species and study designs

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jaimini Patel, Rachael Hardman, Joyce Obeng, Karim Melliti
{"title":"Concentration-QTc modeling provides consistent high QTc sensitivity across species and study designs","authors":"Jaimini Patel,&nbsp;Rachael Hardman,&nbsp;Joyce Obeng,&nbsp;Karim Melliti","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2026.108460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To support an integrated risk assessment for QTc prolongation under the ICH E14/S7B Q&amp;As, the <em>in-vivo</em> QTc assay should follow best practice for demonstrating high drug exposure multiples and sufficient QTc detection sensitivity. Concentration-QTc (C-QTc) modeling can improve study power compared with a traditional by-time analysis and can be used to quantify drug concentration producing a 10 msec effect and any shift between human and pre-clinical species.</div><div>The objective was to compare by-time analysis and C-QTc modeling sensitivity in the 3 large animal species. ICH E14/S7B Q&amp;A compliant <em>in-vivo</em> QTc validation studies were performed with oral moxifloxacin using both a Latin square and an ascending dose design in dog (<em>n</em> = 4 for Latin square and <em>n</em> = 6 for ascending dose design), NHP (n = 4), and minipig (<em>n</em> = 8 for Latin square and <em>n</em> = 5 for ascending dose design). For each study, a separate full PK phase was included.</div><div>For Dog and NHP modeling, basic assumptions were met for the use of a linear mixed effect (LME) model. Least significant difference (LSD) values for LME modeling in dog and NHP for the Latin square design were 3.4–3.5 msec versus 10 msec for the by-time analysis. For the ascending design, LME LSD values were 2.5–2.6 msec for dog and 3.7–4.4 msec for NHP versus respective values of 5.4 msec and 6.6 msec for the by-time analysis. Human multiple of the moxifloxacin critical concentration for dog and NHP was respectively 1.8× and 1.5× for the Latin square and 2.2× and 2.3× for the ascending design. For minipig modeling, basic assumptions for LME were not met, notably due to the high dose effects and a curvilinear C-QTc relationship. An Emax model was used producing LSD values of 3–5 msec versus 10–11 msec for the by-time analysis, and human multiple of 0.5–0.7×. When the high dose was omitted to apply an LME model, LSD values for the Latin square design were 3.9–4.3 msec with a human multiple of 0.5×.</div><div>Moxifloxacin C-QTc modeling provides consistent LSD sensitivity of 3–5 msec for all 3 species and both study designs, meeting requirements for ICH E14/S7B Q&amp;As 5.1 and 6.1.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 108460"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871926000535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To support an integrated risk assessment for QTc prolongation under the ICH E14/S7B Q&As, the in-vivo QTc assay should follow best practice for demonstrating high drug exposure multiples and sufficient QTc detection sensitivity. Concentration-QTc (C-QTc) modeling can improve study power compared with a traditional by-time analysis and can be used to quantify drug concentration producing a 10 msec effect and any shift between human and pre-clinical species.
The objective was to compare by-time analysis and C-QTc modeling sensitivity in the 3 large animal species. ICH E14/S7B Q&A compliant in-vivo QTc validation studies were performed with oral moxifloxacin using both a Latin square and an ascending dose design in dog (n = 4 for Latin square and n = 6 for ascending dose design), NHP (n = 4), and minipig (n = 8 for Latin square and n = 5 for ascending dose design). For each study, a separate full PK phase was included.
For Dog and NHP modeling, basic assumptions were met for the use of a linear mixed effect (LME) model. Least significant difference (LSD) values for LME modeling in dog and NHP for the Latin square design were 3.4–3.5 msec versus 10 msec for the by-time analysis. For the ascending design, LME LSD values were 2.5–2.6 msec for dog and 3.7–4.4 msec for NHP versus respective values of 5.4 msec and 6.6 msec for the by-time analysis. Human multiple of the moxifloxacin critical concentration for dog and NHP was respectively 1.8× and 1.5× for the Latin square and 2.2× and 2.3× for the ascending design. For minipig modeling, basic assumptions for LME were not met, notably due to the high dose effects and a curvilinear C-QTc relationship. An Emax model was used producing LSD values of 3–5 msec versus 10–11 msec for the by-time analysis, and human multiple of 0.5–0.7×. When the high dose was omitted to apply an LME model, LSD values for the Latin square design were 3.9–4.3 msec with a human multiple of 0.5×.
Moxifloxacin C-QTc modeling provides consistent LSD sensitivity of 3–5 msec for all 3 species and both study designs, meeting requirements for ICH E14/S7B Q&As 5.1 and 6.1.
浓度-QTc模型在不同物种和研究设计中提供一致的高QTc灵敏度
为了支持ICH E14/S7B Q&;As下QTc延长的综合风险评估,体内QTc测定应遵循最佳实践,以证明高药物暴露倍数和足够的QTc检测灵敏度。与传统的按时间分析相比,浓度- qtc (C-QTc)模型可以提高研究能力,并可用于量化产生10毫秒效应的药物浓度,以及人类和临床前物种之间的任何变化。目的是比较3种大型动物的时间分析和C-QTc建模敏感性。采用拉丁方和上升剂量设计对口服莫西沙星进行了符合要求的体内QTc验证研究(拉丁方和上升剂量设计分别为n = 4和n = 6), NHP和minipig(拉丁方和上升剂量设计分别为n = 8和n = 5)。对于每个研究,包括一个单独的完整的PK阶段。对于Dog和NHP模型,使用线性混合效应(LME)模型满足基本假设。LME模型在狗和NHP中的最小显着差异(LSD)值为3.4-3.5 msec,而按时间分析为10 msec。在上升设计中,狗的LME LSD值为2.5-2.6 msec, NHP为3.7-4.4 msec,而按时间分析的LME LSD值分别为5.4 msec和6.6 msec。莫西沙星对犬和NHP临界浓度的人体倍数拉丁方分别为1.8倍和1.5倍,上升设计分别为2.2倍和2.3倍。对于小型猪模型,不满足LME的基本假设,特别是由于高剂量效应和曲线C-QTc关系。利用Emax模型进行时间分析,产生的LSD值分别为3-5 msec和10-11 msec,人类倍数为0.5 - 0.7倍。当省略高剂量以应用LME模型时,拉丁方设计的LSD值为3.9-4.3 msec,人体倍数为0.5倍。莫西沙星C-QTc模型对所有3个物种和两种研究设计的LSD灵敏度均为3 - 5 msec,符合ICH E14/S7B Q&;As 5.1和6.1的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书