{"title":"Mapping Artificial Intelligence concerns to global sustainability: Insights from social media and expert solutions","authors":"Navid Mohammadi, Mehrdad Maghsoudi, Mohammadreza Bakhtiari","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as both an enabler of and a risk to sustainable development. Yet research remains dominated by expert-driven assessments, with little attention to how the public perceives and discusses AI’s sustainability implications. This study examines concern-oriented public discourse about AI in relation to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by analyzing social media posts and developing expert-derived solutions. We collected and analyzed over 700,000 posts from X (formerly Twitter) spanning three years (2022–2025), applying natural language processing techniques including Fine-tuned BERT, Zero-Shot Classification, and Pre-trained XLNet. The analysis reveals pronounced imbalances in public attention across the 17 SDGs, with 52.8 % of AI-related discussions concentrated on SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and 11.8 % on SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions), while critical goals such as SDG 1 (No Poverty) and SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) receive minimal attention (1.0 % and 0.3 %, respectively). To address these gaps, we convened a focus group of nine experts from academia, industry, and policy sectors to develop actionable solutions for each SDG, including AI-driven financial inclusion tools, precision agriculture models, and energy-efficient “Green AI” technologies. Our findings suggest a notable misalignment between AI’s potential to address pressing humanitarian challenges and the patterns of concern-oriented public discourse captured in this study. These findings point to the need for broader public awareness, robust ethical governance, and interdisciplinary collaboration if AI is to advance sustainability goals equitably and reach underserved communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100524"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683926001197","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as both an enabler of and a risk to sustainable development. Yet research remains dominated by expert-driven assessments, with little attention to how the public perceives and discusses AI’s sustainability implications. This study examines concern-oriented public discourse about AI in relation to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by analyzing social media posts and developing expert-derived solutions. We collected and analyzed over 700,000 posts from X (formerly Twitter) spanning three years (2022–2025), applying natural language processing techniques including Fine-tuned BERT, Zero-Shot Classification, and Pre-trained XLNet. The analysis reveals pronounced imbalances in public attention across the 17 SDGs, with 52.8 % of AI-related discussions concentrated on SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and 11.8 % on SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions), while critical goals such as SDG 1 (No Poverty) and SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) receive minimal attention (1.0 % and 0.3 %, respectively). To address these gaps, we convened a focus group of nine experts from academia, industry, and policy sectors to develop actionable solutions for each SDG, including AI-driven financial inclusion tools, precision agriculture models, and energy-efficient “Green AI” technologies. Our findings suggest a notable misalignment between AI’s potential to address pressing humanitarian challenges and the patterns of concern-oriented public discourse captured in this study. These findings point to the need for broader public awareness, robust ethical governance, and interdisciplinary collaboration if AI is to advance sustainability goals equitably and reach underserved communities.
期刊介绍:
Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues.
Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes:
Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations;
Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability;
Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing;
Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.