Mapping Artificial Intelligence concerns to global sustainability: Insights from social media and expert solutions

IF 9.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Geography and Sustainability Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-17 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100524
Navid Mohammadi, Mehrdad Maghsoudi, Mohammadreza Bakhtiari
{"title":"Mapping Artificial Intelligence concerns to global sustainability: Insights from social media and expert solutions","authors":"Navid Mohammadi,&nbsp;Mehrdad Maghsoudi,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Bakhtiari","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as both an enabler of and a risk to sustainable development. Yet research remains dominated by expert-driven assessments, with little attention to how the public perceives and discusses AI’s sustainability implications. This study examines concern-oriented public discourse about AI in relation to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by analyzing social media posts and developing expert-derived solutions. We collected and analyzed over 700,000 posts from X (formerly Twitter) spanning three years (2022–2025), applying natural language processing techniques including Fine-tuned BERT, Zero-Shot Classification, and Pre-trained XLNet. The analysis reveals pronounced imbalances in public attention across the 17 SDGs, with 52.8 % of AI-related discussions concentrated on SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and 11.8 % on SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions), while critical goals such as SDG 1 (No Poverty) and SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) receive minimal attention (1.0 % and 0.3 %, respectively). To address these gaps, we convened a focus group of nine experts from academia, industry, and policy sectors to develop actionable solutions for each SDG, including AI-driven financial inclusion tools, precision agriculture models, and energy-efficient “Green AI” technologies. Our findings suggest a notable misalignment between AI’s potential to address pressing humanitarian challenges and the patterns of concern-oriented public discourse captured in this study. These findings point to the need for broader public awareness, robust ethical governance, and interdisciplinary collaboration if AI is to advance sustainability goals equitably and reach underserved communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100524"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683926001197","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as both an enabler of and a risk to sustainable development. Yet research remains dominated by expert-driven assessments, with little attention to how the public perceives and discusses AI’s sustainability implications. This study examines concern-oriented public discourse about AI in relation to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by analyzing social media posts and developing expert-derived solutions. We collected and analyzed over 700,000 posts from X (formerly Twitter) spanning three years (2022–2025), applying natural language processing techniques including Fine-tuned BERT, Zero-Shot Classification, and Pre-trained XLNet. The analysis reveals pronounced imbalances in public attention across the 17 SDGs, with 52.8 % of AI-related discussions concentrated on SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and 11.8 % on SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions), while critical goals such as SDG 1 (No Poverty) and SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) receive minimal attention (1.0 % and 0.3 %, respectively). To address these gaps, we convened a focus group of nine experts from academia, industry, and policy sectors to develop actionable solutions for each SDG, including AI-driven financial inclusion tools, precision agriculture models, and energy-efficient “Green AI” technologies. Our findings suggest a notable misalignment between AI’s potential to address pressing humanitarian challenges and the patterns of concern-oriented public discourse captured in this study. These findings point to the need for broader public awareness, robust ethical governance, and interdisciplinary collaboration if AI is to advance sustainability goals equitably and reach underserved communities.
将人工智能问题映射到全球可持续性:来自社交媒体和专家解决方案的见解
人工智能(AI)越来越被认为是可持续发展的推动者和风险。然而,研究仍然以专家驱动的评估为主,很少关注公众如何看待和讨论人工智能的可持续性影响。本研究通过分析社交媒体帖子和开发专家衍生的解决方案,考察了与联合国可持续发展目标(sdg)相关的人工智能关注导向的公共话语。我们从X(以前的Twitter)收集并分析了三年(2022-2025)期间的70多万篇帖子,应用了自然语言处理技术,包括微调BERT、零概率分类和预训练的XLNet。分析显示,公众对17个可持续发展目标的关注明显不平衡,52.8%的人工智能相关讨论集中在可持续发展目标9(工业、创新和基础设施)上,11.8%集中在可持续发展目标16(和平、正义和强大的机构)上,而可持续发展目标1(无贫困)和可持续发展目标2(零饥饿)等关键目标受到的关注最少(分别为1.0%和0.3%)。为了弥补这些差距,我们召集了一个由来自学术界、工业界和政策部门的9名专家组成的焦点小组,为每个可持续发展目标制定可行的解决方案,包括人工智能驱动的普惠金融工具、精准农业模型和节能的“绿色人工智能”技术。我们的研究结果表明,人工智能在解决紧迫的人道主义挑战方面的潜力与本研究中捕获的关注导向的公共话语模式之间存在明显的不一致。这些发现表明,如果人工智能要公平地推进可持续发展目标并覆盖服务不足的社区,就需要更广泛的公众意识、强有力的道德治理和跨学科合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geography and Sustainability
Geography and Sustainability Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues. Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes: Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations; Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability; Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing; Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书