Utilizing in vitro assays to assess drug-induced central nervous system liabilities

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Louisa A.K. Zolkiewski, Kimberley L. Rockley, Karen Jones, Katie Newman, Hannah Jennings, Magali-Anne Maizieres, Ruth Roberts, Michael Morton
{"title":"Utilizing in vitro assays to assess drug-induced central nervous system liabilities","authors":"Louisa A.K. Zolkiewski,&nbsp;Kimberley L. Rockley,&nbsp;Karen Jones,&nbsp;Katie Newman,&nbsp;Hannah Jennings,&nbsp;Magali-Anne Maizieres,&nbsp;Ruth Roberts,&nbsp;Michael Morton","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2026.108442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Central nervous system (CNS) liabilities (e.g. seizures) remain a significant cause of drug development attrition, yet they are typically not identified until late-stage <em>in vivo</em> toxicology studies where adverse findings can result in costly delays or project termination. Further, ~25% of clinical trial failures are due to safety concerns that were undetected in earlier <em>in vivo</em> studies. This emphasises the urgent need for predictive, human-relevant <em>in vitro</em> assays that can be implemented earlier in the drug development process to assess CNS safety risks. The cardiovascular safety field has benefitted from early-stage screening using human ion channel assays and human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-cardiomyocytes. Similarly, we developed two complementary <em>in vitro</em> CNS safety assays: 1) an ion channel panel evaluated via automated electrophysiology, and 2) an hiPSC-neuronal model analyzed using microelectrode array (MEA) to measure electrical activity in response to known seizurogenic compounds. In addition to seizure risk, sedation is a common adverse finding in preclinical studies. To address this, we aimed to validate our <em>in vitro</em> CNS assay for predicting sedative compound effects. GABAergic signalling plays a crucial role in the sleep-wake cycle, with GABA<sub>A</sub> receptor activation resulting in sedation. We tested 14 sedative compounds (targeting both GABA and non-GABA pathways) and 5 non-sedative controls in the hiPSC-neuronal model. MEA analysis showed that GABA<sub>A</sub> agonists (muscimol, etomidate, ethanol) and certain ion channel antagonists (valbenazine, dextromethorphan, primidone) reduced neural firing and burst activity, indicating sedative effects. Negative control compounds produced no significant changes. Of the 19 known compounds screened, 85% were accurately classified. Automated patch-clamp electrophysiology further confirmed these findings by testing compound interactions with GABA<sub>A</sub> and other CNS ion channels. These results support the use of our <em>in vitro</em> CNS models for detecting sedative and seizurogenic effects, thus enhancing translational relevance. These platforms offer valuable human-based tools for early hazard identification and prioritisation of drug candidates, as well as interpreting CNS-related findings from <em>in vivo</em> studies thus complying with the principles of 3Rs to minimise and replace the use of animals in scientific testing. Ongoing work is focused on expanding this model to evaluate additional sedation-related ion channels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 108442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871926000353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) liabilities (e.g. seizures) remain a significant cause of drug development attrition, yet they are typically not identified until late-stage in vivo toxicology studies where adverse findings can result in costly delays or project termination. Further, ~25% of clinical trial failures are due to safety concerns that were undetected in earlier in vivo studies. This emphasises the urgent need for predictive, human-relevant in vitro assays that can be implemented earlier in the drug development process to assess CNS safety risks. The cardiovascular safety field has benefitted from early-stage screening using human ion channel assays and human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-cardiomyocytes. Similarly, we developed two complementary in vitro CNS safety assays: 1) an ion channel panel evaluated via automated electrophysiology, and 2) an hiPSC-neuronal model analyzed using microelectrode array (MEA) to measure electrical activity in response to known seizurogenic compounds. In addition to seizure risk, sedation is a common adverse finding in preclinical studies. To address this, we aimed to validate our in vitro CNS assay for predicting sedative compound effects. GABAergic signalling plays a crucial role in the sleep-wake cycle, with GABAA receptor activation resulting in sedation. We tested 14 sedative compounds (targeting both GABA and non-GABA pathways) and 5 non-sedative controls in the hiPSC-neuronal model. MEA analysis showed that GABAA agonists (muscimol, etomidate, ethanol) and certain ion channel antagonists (valbenazine, dextromethorphan, primidone) reduced neural firing and burst activity, indicating sedative effects. Negative control compounds produced no significant changes. Of the 19 known compounds screened, 85% were accurately classified. Automated patch-clamp electrophysiology further confirmed these findings by testing compound interactions with GABAA and other CNS ion channels. These results support the use of our in vitro CNS models for detecting sedative and seizurogenic effects, thus enhancing translational relevance. These platforms offer valuable human-based tools for early hazard identification and prioritisation of drug candidates, as well as interpreting CNS-related findings from in vivo studies thus complying with the principles of 3Rs to minimise and replace the use of animals in scientific testing. Ongoing work is focused on expanding this model to evaluate additional sedation-related ion channels.
利用体外试验评估药物诱导的中枢神经系统负荷
中枢神经系统(CNS)缺陷(如癫痫发作)仍然是药物开发损耗的一个重要原因,但通常要到体内毒理学研究的后期才会发现,而不良结果可能导致代价高昂的延迟或项目终止。此外,约25%的临床试验失败是由于早期体内研究中未发现的安全性问题。这强调了对预测性的、与人类相关的体外检测的迫切需求,这种检测可以在药物开发过程的早期实施,以评估中枢神经系统的安全性风险。心血管安全领域得益于使用人离子通道试验和人诱导多能干细胞(hiPSC)-心肌细胞的早期筛选。同样,我们开发了两种互补的体外CNS安全性试验:1)通过自动电生理学评估离子通道面板,2)使用微电极阵列(MEA)分析hipsc神经元模型,以测量对已知癫痫致尿化合物的电活动。除了癫痫发作风险外,镇静也是临床前研究中常见的不良发现。为了解决这个问题,我们的目的是验证我们的体外中枢神经系统试验预测镇静复合效应。GABAA能信号在睡眠-觉醒周期中起着至关重要的作用,GABAA受体的激活导致镇静。我们在hipsc神经元模型中测试了14种镇静化合物(针对GABA和非GABA途径)和5种非镇静对照。MEA分析显示,GABAA激动剂(muscimol, etomidate,乙醇)和某些离子通道拮抗剂(valbenazine,右美沙芬,primidone)可降低神经放电和爆发活性,显示镇静作用。阴性对照化合物无显著变化。在筛选的19种已知化合物中,85%被准确分类。自动化膜片钳电生理学通过测试化合物与GABAA和其他中枢神经系统离子通道的相互作用进一步证实了这些发现。这些结果支持我们的体外CNS模型用于检测镇静和癫痫致尿作用,从而增强翻译相关性。这些平台为早期危险识别和候选药物的优先排序提供了有价值的基于人类的工具,并解释了体内研究中与中枢神经系统相关的发现,从而符合3r原则,以尽量减少和取代科学试验中动物的使用。正在进行的工作重点是扩展该模型以评估其他与镇静相关的离子通道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书