Randall L. Rasmusson, Leigh Korbel, Mark W. Nowak, Kazuya Tsurudome, Lars Nilsson, Brian K. Panama, Shivani Acharya, Daniel R.P. Sauter, Glenna C.L. Bett
{"title":"Categorizing TdP risk using hERG data obtained from automated patch-clamp using step-ramp hERG protocols and CiPA TMS values","authors":"Randall L. Rasmusson, Leigh Korbel, Mark W. Nowak, Kazuya Tsurudome, Lars Nilsson, Brian K. Panama, Shivani Acharya, Daniel R.P. Sauter, Glenna C.L. Bett","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2026.108507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Comprehensive in-vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) assesses drug effects on multiple ionic currents and a detailed drug-binding model of HERG to measure pro-arrhythmic risk (TMS value). Adoption of TMS for IND filings is hampered by difficult experimental protocols requiring manual patch-clamp data. Objectives: 1) Assess hERG drug block on currents from a step-ramp protocol using the Sophion QPatch Compact. 2) Determine drug TdP risk categorization from the TMS using CyberQ-qNet analysis software. 3) Determine best practices for data acquisition, current trace data processing, and quality control. hERG currents were recorded at 36 °C using a step-ramp protocol on the Sophion QPatch Compact platform using hERG-expressing CHO cells. Control currents were recorded until hERG current stabilization. Test currents were measured by perfusion with a single test drug concentration until steady-state block. Cells were then perfused with a reference compound (E-4031) resulting in complete block of hERG. Drugs tested were dofetilide, ondansetron, and moxifloxacin. Current traces underwent manual quality control, leak subtraction and reference current trace subtraction. Cytocybernetic's CyberQ-qNET analysis software calculated the qNet and TMS values. Step ramp TMS scores were compared to those obtained by the FDA using the Milnes protocol. CyberQ-qNet analysis software fitted raw HERG data to the CiPA three-state drug block model. The resulting analysis incorporated published values for other currents to obtain TMS. Similar qNET, TMS, and TdP risk categorization were similar with the Step-Ramp protocol and the Milnes protocol: dofetilide (0.0609 vs 0.0524), ondansetron (0.0675 vs 0.0625). Ondansetron was categorized as intermediate risk, but dofetilide was miscategorized as intermediate (although borderline and likely due to small N for low doses). For moxifloxacin (not a CiPA compound), TMS was 0.0552 and was categorized as high-risk TdP. Model fitting was highly sensitive to data quality. One important quality control subtraction of the reference current traces (100% hERG block) to remove non-hERG (i.e. native CHO) currents present in the step pulse. This suggests hERG currents from the Sophion QPatch at physiological temperature using the Step-Ramp could be a viable strategy for assessing arrhythmogenic potential of drugs using our CyberQ-qNet software in compliance with CiPA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 108507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871926001000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Comprehensive in-vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) assesses drug effects on multiple ionic currents and a detailed drug-binding model of HERG to measure pro-arrhythmic risk (TMS value). Adoption of TMS for IND filings is hampered by difficult experimental protocols requiring manual patch-clamp data. Objectives: 1) Assess hERG drug block on currents from a step-ramp protocol using the Sophion QPatch Compact. 2) Determine drug TdP risk categorization from the TMS using CyberQ-qNet analysis software. 3) Determine best practices for data acquisition, current trace data processing, and quality control. hERG currents were recorded at 36 °C using a step-ramp protocol on the Sophion QPatch Compact platform using hERG-expressing CHO cells. Control currents were recorded until hERG current stabilization. Test currents were measured by perfusion with a single test drug concentration until steady-state block. Cells were then perfused with a reference compound (E-4031) resulting in complete block of hERG. Drugs tested were dofetilide, ondansetron, and moxifloxacin. Current traces underwent manual quality control, leak subtraction and reference current trace subtraction. Cytocybernetic's CyberQ-qNET analysis software calculated the qNet and TMS values. Step ramp TMS scores were compared to those obtained by the FDA using the Milnes protocol. CyberQ-qNet analysis software fitted raw HERG data to the CiPA three-state drug block model. The resulting analysis incorporated published values for other currents to obtain TMS. Similar qNET, TMS, and TdP risk categorization were similar with the Step-Ramp protocol and the Milnes protocol: dofetilide (0.0609 vs 0.0524), ondansetron (0.0675 vs 0.0625). Ondansetron was categorized as intermediate risk, but dofetilide was miscategorized as intermediate (although borderline and likely due to small N for low doses). For moxifloxacin (not a CiPA compound), TMS was 0.0552 and was categorized as high-risk TdP. Model fitting was highly sensitive to data quality. One important quality control subtraction of the reference current traces (100% hERG block) to remove non-hERG (i.e. native CHO) currents present in the step pulse. This suggests hERG currents from the Sophion QPatch at physiological temperature using the Step-Ramp could be a viable strategy for assessing arrhythmogenic potential of drugs using our CyberQ-qNet software in compliance with CiPA.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.