Categorizing TdP risk using hERG data obtained from automated patch-clamp using step-ramp hERG protocols and CiPA TMS values

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Randall L. Rasmusson, Leigh Korbel, Mark W. Nowak, Kazuya Tsurudome, Lars Nilsson, Brian K. Panama, Shivani Acharya, Daniel R.P. Sauter, Glenna C.L. Bett
{"title":"Categorizing TdP risk using hERG data obtained from automated patch-clamp using step-ramp hERG protocols and CiPA TMS values","authors":"Randall L. Rasmusson,&nbsp;Leigh Korbel,&nbsp;Mark W. Nowak,&nbsp;Kazuya Tsurudome,&nbsp;Lars Nilsson,&nbsp;Brian K. Panama,&nbsp;Shivani Acharya,&nbsp;Daniel R.P. Sauter,&nbsp;Glenna C.L. Bett","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2026.108507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Comprehensive in-vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) assesses drug effects on multiple ionic currents and a detailed drug-binding model of HERG to measure pro-arrhythmic risk (TMS value). Adoption of TMS for IND filings is hampered by difficult experimental protocols requiring manual patch-clamp data. Objectives: 1) Assess hERG drug block on currents from a step-ramp protocol using the Sophion QPatch Compact. 2) Determine drug TdP risk categorization from the TMS using CyberQ-qNet analysis software. 3) Determine best practices for data acquisition, current trace data processing, and quality control. hERG currents were recorded at 36 °C using a step-ramp protocol on the Sophion QPatch Compact platform using hERG-expressing CHO cells. Control currents were recorded until hERG current stabilization. Test currents were measured by perfusion with a single test drug concentration until steady-state block. Cells were then perfused with a reference compound (E-4031) resulting in complete block of hERG. Drugs tested were dofetilide, ondansetron, and moxifloxacin. Current traces underwent manual quality control, leak subtraction and reference current trace subtraction. Cytocybernetic's CyberQ-qNET analysis software calculated the qNet and TMS values. Step ramp TMS scores were compared to those obtained by the FDA using the Milnes protocol. CyberQ-qNet analysis software fitted raw HERG data to the CiPA three-state drug block model. The resulting analysis incorporated published values for other currents to obtain TMS. Similar qNET, TMS, and TdP risk categorization were similar with the Step-Ramp protocol and the Milnes protocol: dofetilide (0.0609 vs 0.0524), ondansetron (0.0675 vs 0.0625). Ondansetron was categorized as intermediate risk, but dofetilide was miscategorized as intermediate (although borderline and likely due to small N for low doses). For moxifloxacin (not a CiPA compound), TMS was 0.0552 and was categorized as high-risk TdP. Model fitting was highly sensitive to data quality. One important quality control subtraction of the reference current traces (100% hERG block) to remove non-hERG (i.e. native CHO) currents present in the step pulse. This suggests hERG currents from the Sophion QPatch at physiological temperature using the Step-Ramp could be a viable strategy for assessing arrhythmogenic potential of drugs using our CyberQ-qNet software in compliance with CiPA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 108507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871926001000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Comprehensive in-vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) assesses drug effects on multiple ionic currents and a detailed drug-binding model of HERG to measure pro-arrhythmic risk (TMS value). Adoption of TMS for IND filings is hampered by difficult experimental protocols requiring manual patch-clamp data. Objectives: 1) Assess hERG drug block on currents from a step-ramp protocol using the Sophion QPatch Compact. 2) Determine drug TdP risk categorization from the TMS using CyberQ-qNet analysis software. 3) Determine best practices for data acquisition, current trace data processing, and quality control. hERG currents were recorded at 36 °C using a step-ramp protocol on the Sophion QPatch Compact platform using hERG-expressing CHO cells. Control currents were recorded until hERG current stabilization. Test currents were measured by perfusion with a single test drug concentration until steady-state block. Cells were then perfused with a reference compound (E-4031) resulting in complete block of hERG. Drugs tested were dofetilide, ondansetron, and moxifloxacin. Current traces underwent manual quality control, leak subtraction and reference current trace subtraction. Cytocybernetic's CyberQ-qNET analysis software calculated the qNet and TMS values. Step ramp TMS scores were compared to those obtained by the FDA using the Milnes protocol. CyberQ-qNet analysis software fitted raw HERG data to the CiPA three-state drug block model. The resulting analysis incorporated published values for other currents to obtain TMS. Similar qNET, TMS, and TdP risk categorization were similar with the Step-Ramp protocol and the Milnes protocol: dofetilide (0.0609 vs 0.0524), ondansetron (0.0675 vs 0.0625). Ondansetron was categorized as intermediate risk, but dofetilide was miscategorized as intermediate (although borderline and likely due to small N for low doses). For moxifloxacin (not a CiPA compound), TMS was 0.0552 and was categorized as high-risk TdP. Model fitting was highly sensitive to data quality. One important quality control subtraction of the reference current traces (100% hERG block) to remove non-hERG (i.e. native CHO) currents present in the step pulse. This suggests hERG currents from the Sophion QPatch at physiological temperature using the Step-Ramp could be a viable strategy for assessing arrhythmogenic potential of drugs using our CyberQ-qNet software in compliance with CiPA.
采用阶梯式hERG协议和CiPA TMS值,利用自动膜片钳获得的hERG数据对TdP风险进行分类
综合体外心律失常测定(CiPA)评估药物对多种离子电流的影响,并建立详细的HERG药物结合模型来测量致心律失常风险(TMS值)。由于需要手动膜片钳数据的困难实验方案,采用TMS进行IND申请受到阻碍。目的:1)使用Sophion QPatch Compact评估台阶-斜坡协议下hERG药物阻滞电流。2)使用CyberQ-qNet分析软件从TMS中确定药物TdP风险分类。确定数据采集、当前跟踪数据处理和质量控制的最佳实践。在36°C下,使用表达hERG的CHO细胞,在Sophion QPatch Compact平台上使用台阶-斜坡协议记录hERG电流。记录控制电流,直到hERG电流稳定。测试电流通过灌注单一测试药物浓度测量,直到稳态阻断。然后用参比化合物(E-4031)灌注细胞,导致hERG完全阻断。试验药物为多非利特、昂丹司琼和莫西沙星。电流迹经过人工质量控制、漏迹减去和参考电流迹减去。Cytocybernetic的CyberQ-qNET分析软件计算了qNet和TMS值。将台阶斜坡TMS评分与FDA使用Milnes方案获得的评分进行比较。CyberQ-qNet分析软件将原始HERG数据拟合到CiPA三态药物块模型中。结果分析结合了其他电流的公布值来获得TMS。类似的qNET、TMS和TdP风险分类与Step-Ramp方案和Milnes方案相似:多非利特(0.0609 vs 0.0524)、昂丹司琼(0.0675 vs 0.0625)。昂丹司琼被归类为中等风险,但多非利特被错误地归类为中等风险(尽管处于临界状态,可能是由于低剂量的小N)。莫西沙星(非CiPA化合物)的TMS为0.0552,属于高危TdP。模型拟合对数据质量高度敏感。一个重要的质量控制减去参考电流走线(100% hERG块),以去除阶跃脉冲中存在的非hERG(即原生CHO)电流。这表明,在生理温度下,使用Step-Ramp的Sophion QPatch产生的hERG电流可能是一种可行的策略,可以使用CyberQ-qNet软件根据CiPA评估药物的致心律失常潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书