Recent Advances in Text Anonymization: A Systematic Review

Marina Litvak, Alípio Jorge
{"title":"Recent Advances in Text Anonymization: A Systematic Review","authors":"Marina Litvak, Alípio Jorge","doi":"10.1002/widm.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Text anonymization has become a critical requirement across healthcare, legal, financial, and online communication domains, where large volumes of sensitive textual data are increasingly used for analytics, information retrieval, and model training. Despite decades of research, anonymization remains challenging due to the diversity of sensitive information types, domain‐specific annotation schemes, and the emergence of complex inference risks that extend beyond explicit identifiers. On the other hand, we have seen a large number of approaches using transformers in recent years. This survey provides the first comprehensive and systematic review of text anonymization methods published between 2020 and 2025, covering 48 primary studies identified through a structured search and rigorous screening procedure. We analyze anonymization approaches across rule‐based, statistical, neural, transformer‐based, and large language model (LLM) paradigms, and compare them across multiple domains, languages, and sensitive‐information taxonomies. Our review also synthesizes available datasets, software resources, and evaluation practices used to assess both privacy protection and text utility. The findings highlight significant fragmentation across domains, persistent limitations in handling quasi‐identifiers and semantic leakage, and substantial inconsistencies in evaluation protocols. We identify key methodological trends, gaps, and emerging challenges, including the integration of LLMs, multilingual settings, and adversarial evaluation. Our analysis reveals a growing shift from identifier‐centric de‐identification toward context‐aware anonymization, while evaluation methodologies have not yet evolved at the same pace. We outline open research directions and propose a roadmap toward more robust, context‐aware, and empirically grounded anonymization systems. This survey aims to establish a unified reference point for researchers and practitioners working on privacy‐preserving NLP and sensitive text processing.","PeriodicalId":501013,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.70127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Text anonymization has become a critical requirement across healthcare, legal, financial, and online communication domains, where large volumes of sensitive textual data are increasingly used for analytics, information retrieval, and model training. Despite decades of research, anonymization remains challenging due to the diversity of sensitive information types, domain‐specific annotation schemes, and the emergence of complex inference risks that extend beyond explicit identifiers. On the other hand, we have seen a large number of approaches using transformers in recent years. This survey provides the first comprehensive and systematic review of text anonymization methods published between 2020 and 2025, covering 48 primary studies identified through a structured search and rigorous screening procedure. We analyze anonymization approaches across rule‐based, statistical, neural, transformer‐based, and large language model (LLM) paradigms, and compare them across multiple domains, languages, and sensitive‐information taxonomies. Our review also synthesizes available datasets, software resources, and evaluation practices used to assess both privacy protection and text utility. The findings highlight significant fragmentation across domains, persistent limitations in handling quasi‐identifiers and semantic leakage, and substantial inconsistencies in evaluation protocols. We identify key methodological trends, gaps, and emerging challenges, including the integration of LLMs, multilingual settings, and adversarial evaluation. Our analysis reveals a growing shift from identifier‐centric de‐identification toward context‐aware anonymization, while evaluation methodologies have not yet evolved at the same pace. We outline open research directions and propose a roadmap toward more robust, context‐aware, and empirically grounded anonymization systems. This survey aims to establish a unified reference point for researchers and practitioners working on privacy‐preserving NLP and sensitive text processing.
文本匿名化的最新进展:系统综述
文本匿名化已成为医疗保健、法律、金融和在线通信领域的关键需求,在这些领域,大量敏感文本数据越来越多地用于分析、信息检索和模型训练。尽管经过数十年的研究,由于敏感信息类型的多样性、特定于领域的注释方案以及超出显式标识符的复杂推理风险的出现,匿名化仍然具有挑战性。另一方面,近年来我们看到了大量使用变压器的方法。本调查首次对2020年至2025年间发表的文本匿名化方法进行了全面和系统的回顾,涵盖了通过结构化搜索和严格筛选程序确定的48项主要研究。我们分析了基于规则、统计、神经、基于转换器和大型语言模型(LLM)范式的匿名化方法,并在多个领域、语言和敏感信息分类中对它们进行了比较。我们的综述还综合了可用的数据集、软件资源和用于评估隐私保护和文本效用的评估实践。研究结果强调了跨领域的显著分裂,处理准标识符和语义泄漏的持续限制,以及评估协议的实质性不一致。我们确定了关键的方法趋势、差距和新出现的挑战,包括法学硕士的整合、多语言设置和对抗性评估。我们的分析揭示了从以标识符为中心的去识别向上下文感知的匿名化的转变,而评估方法尚未以同样的速度发展。我们概述了开放的研究方向,并提出了一个路线图,以实现更强大,上下文感知和经验为基础的匿名化系统。本调查旨在为保护隐私的自然语言处理和敏感文本处理的研究人员和实践者建立一个统一的参考点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书