Transition From Preservice to In-Service Teaching: The Impact of Personal Attributes and Social-Environmental Factors on Well-Being and Perceived Teaching Quality
Wening Cahyawulan, Jiafang Lu, Robert M. Klassen, Hui Wang
{"title":"Transition From Preservice to In-Service Teaching: The Impact of Personal Attributes and Social-Environmental Factors on Well-Being and Perceived Teaching Quality","authors":"Wening Cahyawulan, Jiafang Lu, Robert M. Klassen, Hui Wang","doi":"10.1177/00224871261468325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transition from preservice to in-service teaching is a critical period for early career teachers, often presenting challenges that affect their occupational success and well-being. Identifying factors that influence key outcomes—such as transition difficulties, perceived teaching quality, well-being, and intention to quit—is essential for providing timely support. This longitudinal study examined how preservice teachers’ cognitive attributes (Grade Point Average, pedagogical knowledge, practicum grades), non-cognitive attributes (personality, teaching motivation), and social-environmental support before graduation relate to their teaching outcomes after entering the profession. The sample comprised 1,711 preservice teachers; 206 reported being teachers 10 months after graduation and completed follow-up surveys. Structural equation modeling revealed that cognitive attributes and social-environmental support were not significantly associated with teaching outcomes. Instead, higher conscientiousness, greater openness, and stronger teaching motivation predicted fewer transition difficulties, greater perceived teaching quality, and better well-being. These findings underscore the importance of cultivating non-cognitive skills during teacher training to better prepare future educators.","PeriodicalId":17162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teacher Education","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871261468325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The transition from preservice to in-service teaching is a critical period for early career teachers, often presenting challenges that affect their occupational success and well-being. Identifying factors that influence key outcomes—such as transition difficulties, perceived teaching quality, well-being, and intention to quit—is essential for providing timely support. This longitudinal study examined how preservice teachers’ cognitive attributes (Grade Point Average, pedagogical knowledge, practicum grades), non-cognitive attributes (personality, teaching motivation), and social-environmental support before graduation relate to their teaching outcomes after entering the profession. The sample comprised 1,711 preservice teachers; 206 reported being teachers 10 months after graduation and completed follow-up surveys. Structural equation modeling revealed that cognitive attributes and social-environmental support were not significantly associated with teaching outcomes. Instead, higher conscientiousness, greater openness, and stronger teaching motivation predicted fewer transition difficulties, greater perceived teaching quality, and better well-being. These findings underscore the importance of cultivating non-cognitive skills during teacher training to better prepare future educators.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Teacher Education, the flagship journal of AACTE, is to serve as a research forum for a diverse group of scholars who are invested in the preparation and continued support of teachers and who can have a significant voice in discussions and decision-making around issues of teacher education. One of the fundamental goals of the journal is the use of evidence from rigorous investigation to identify and address the increasingly complex issues confronting teacher education at the national and global levels. These issues include but are not limited to preparing teachers to effectively address the needs of marginalized youth, their families and communities; program design and impact; selection, recruitment and retention of teachers from underrepresented groups; local and national policy; accountability; and routes to certification. JTE does not publish book reviews, program evaluations or articles solely describing programs, program components, courses or personal experiences. In addition, JTE does not accept manuscripts that are solely about the development or validation of an instrument unless the use of that instrument yields data providing new insights into issues of relevance to teacher education (MSU, February 2016).