Season-specific associations between electricity-based frailty risk and life-space mobility, health-related quality of life, and physical function in older adults.

IF 3.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
mHealth Pub Date : 2026-06-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-2026-0013
Ryo Tsujinaka, Yumi Higuchi, Aki Gen, Tetsuya Ueda, Haruka Adachi
{"title":"Season-specific associations between electricity-based frailty risk and life-space mobility, health-related quality of life, and physical function in older adults.","authors":"Ryo Tsujinaka, Yumi Higuchi, Aki Gen, Tetsuya Ueda, Haruka Adachi","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-2026-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seasonal variations in physical and mental functioning among older adults have been widely reported; however, whether frailty risk exhibits season-specific patterns and associations with health-related outcomes remains unclear. This exploratory study aimed to examine season-specific associations between electricity-based frailty risk and health-related outcomes among community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Older adults living alone in apartment complexes in Osaka City, Japan were recruited. Monthly frailty risk indices, based on patterns of daily living behaviors such as wake-up time, bedtime, and time spent outside the home, were derived from household electricity consumption data collected over a 12-month period from October 2023 to September 2024. Life-space mobility, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and physical function were assessed once via a face-to-face survey conducted between October and November 2024 using the Life-Space Assessment (LSA), the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, respectively. Seasonal mean frailty risk indices were classified according to the seasonal definitions provided by the Japan Meteorological Agency. Bayesian correlation and linear regression analyses were conducted separately for each season, and exploratory linear mixed-effects models were performed using the monthly Frailty Risk Index values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 18 individuals who participated, 14 [median age: 81.0 years, interquartile range (IQR), 10.3 years; 86% women] were included in the analysis. In winter, Bayesian analyses supported negative correlations between the Frailty Risk Index and the LSA [Bayes factor (BF<sub>10</sub>) =6.285, 95% credible interval (CrI): -0.857 to -0.146] and EQ-5D-5L (BF<sub>10</sub> =13.95, 95% CrI: -0.885 to -0.237), whereas no sufficient evidence supported an association with physical function assessed by the TUG test. In Bayesian regression analyses, the winter model including both the LSA and EQ-5D-5L showed the highest posterior support (BF<sub>M</sub> =2.089, R<sup>2</sup>=0.603), although this finding should be interpreted cautiously owing to the small sample size. No sufficient evidence of an association was observed in spring, summer, or autumn.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this exploratory pilot study of 14 older adults living alone, electricity-based frailty risk was associated with life-space mobility and HRQoL, with associations observed for winter Frailty Risk Index values. However, the small sample size, single-time assessment of health-related outcomes, and potential residual confounding preclude definitive conclusions regarding season-specific effects. Larger longitudinal studies with repeated health assessments are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"12 ","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13466668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-2026-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Seasonal variations in physical and mental functioning among older adults have been widely reported; however, whether frailty risk exhibits season-specific patterns and associations with health-related outcomes remains unclear. This exploratory study aimed to examine season-specific associations between electricity-based frailty risk and health-related outcomes among community-dwelling older adults.

Methods: Older adults living alone in apartment complexes in Osaka City, Japan were recruited. Monthly frailty risk indices, based on patterns of daily living behaviors such as wake-up time, bedtime, and time spent outside the home, were derived from household electricity consumption data collected over a 12-month period from October 2023 to September 2024. Life-space mobility, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and physical function were assessed once via a face-to-face survey conducted between October and November 2024 using the Life-Space Assessment (LSA), the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, respectively. Seasonal mean frailty risk indices were classified according to the seasonal definitions provided by the Japan Meteorological Agency. Bayesian correlation and linear regression analyses were conducted separately for each season, and exploratory linear mixed-effects models were performed using the monthly Frailty Risk Index values.

Results: Of the 18 individuals who participated, 14 [median age: 81.0 years, interquartile range (IQR), 10.3 years; 86% women] were included in the analysis. In winter, Bayesian analyses supported negative correlations between the Frailty Risk Index and the LSA [Bayes factor (BF10) =6.285, 95% credible interval (CrI): -0.857 to -0.146] and EQ-5D-5L (BF10 =13.95, 95% CrI: -0.885 to -0.237), whereas no sufficient evidence supported an association with physical function assessed by the TUG test. In Bayesian regression analyses, the winter model including both the LSA and EQ-5D-5L showed the highest posterior support (BFM =2.089, R2=0.603), although this finding should be interpreted cautiously owing to the small sample size. No sufficient evidence of an association was observed in spring, summer, or autumn.

Conclusions: In this exploratory pilot study of 14 older adults living alone, electricity-based frailty risk was associated with life-space mobility and HRQoL, with associations observed for winter Frailty Risk Index values. However, the small sample size, single-time assessment of health-related outcomes, and potential residual confounding preclude definitive conclusions regarding season-specific effects. Larger longitudinal studies with repeated health assessments are needed to validate these findings.

基于电的虚弱风险与老年人生活空间流动性、健康相关生活质量和身体功能之间的季节特异性关联。
背景:老年人身体和心理功能的季节性变化已被广泛报道;然而,虚弱风险是否表现出特定季节的模式以及与健康相关结果的关联仍不清楚。本探索性研究旨在检查社区居住老年人中基于电力的虚弱风险与健康相关结果之间的季节性关联。方法:招募日本大阪市公寓小区独居的老年人。基于日常生活行为模式(如起床时间、就寝时间和外出时间)的月度脆弱性风险指数,来自于2023年10月至2024年9月12个月期间收集的家庭用电量数据。生活空间流动性、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和身体功能分别于2024年10月至11月进行面对面调查,采用生活空间评估(LSA)、EuroQol 5维5级问卷(EQ-5D-5L)和Timed Up and Go (TUG)测试。根据日本气象厅提供的季节定义对季节平均脆弱风险指数进行分类。每个季节分别进行贝叶斯相关分析和线性回归分析,并使用月度脆弱风险指数值进行探索性线性混合效应模型。结果:18例受试者中,14例[年龄中位数:81.0岁,四分位间距(IQR): 10.3岁;86%的女性被纳入分析。在冬季,贝叶斯分析支持衰弱风险指数与LSA[贝叶斯因子(Bayes factor, BF10) =6.285, 95%可信区间(CrI): -0.857至-0.146]和EQ-5D-5L (BF10 =13.95, 95%可信区间(CrI): -0.885至-0.237]呈负相关,而没有足够的证据支持TUG测试评估的与身体功能的关联。在贝叶斯回归分析中,包括LSA和EQ-5D-5L的冬季模型显示出最高的后验支持度(BFM =2.089, R2=0.603),但由于样本量较小,这一发现需要谨慎解释。在春、夏、秋均未观察到充分的关联证据。结论:在这项对14名独居老年人的探索性试点研究中,基于电的虚弱风险与生活空间流动性和HRQoL相关,并与冬季虚弱风险指数值相关。然而,样本量小,健康相关结果的单次评估,以及潜在的残留混淆,排除了关于季节特异性影响的明确结论。需要更大规模的纵向研究和反复的健康评估来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书