[Investigating the 'unifying of disease names in traditional Chinese medicine' in the period of the Republic of China].

Q4 Medicine
H Y Ding, L Zhang, S H Liang
{"title":"[Investigating the 'unifying of disease names in traditional Chinese medicine' in the period of the Republic of China].","authors":"H Y Ding, L Zhang, S H Liang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112155-20240520-00071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A project to unify the terminology of diseases in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) nationwide was initiated by the Central National Medical Bureau in 1933, with the project named 'the Case of TCM Disease Name Unification'. This paper investigated the process and the content of the project, referenced the specific opinions of the renowned physicians who experienced the project, analysed the perspectives of the project that sparked social controversy, such as the development principles of Chinese medicine, the social situation at that time, the principles of integrated medicine and the scientific modernisation of Chinese medicine, and summarised the opposing opinions and underling factors. The three findings were as follows: the fundamental differences between traditional Chinese and Western medical systems, the power limitations of the Central National Medical Bureau, and the immature understanding of combining Chinese and Western medicine. It was also found that unifying the terminology of diseases in traditional Chinese medicine was an important trial in terms of and the scientific modernisation of Chinese medicine. However, its practical approach to 'control Chinese medicine with Western medicine' drove anxiety in people about the independence of Chinese medicine. This case provides TCM standardization, terminology normalization, and the practice of integrating Chinese and Western medicine with an historical reference.</p>","PeriodicalId":35995,"journal":{"name":"中华医史杂志","volume":"56 4","pages":"241-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医史杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112155-20240520-00071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A project to unify the terminology of diseases in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) nationwide was initiated by the Central National Medical Bureau in 1933, with the project named 'the Case of TCM Disease Name Unification'. This paper investigated the process and the content of the project, referenced the specific opinions of the renowned physicians who experienced the project, analysed the perspectives of the project that sparked social controversy, such as the development principles of Chinese medicine, the social situation at that time, the principles of integrated medicine and the scientific modernisation of Chinese medicine, and summarised the opposing opinions and underling factors. The three findings were as follows: the fundamental differences between traditional Chinese and Western medical systems, the power limitations of the Central National Medical Bureau, and the immature understanding of combining Chinese and Western medicine. It was also found that unifying the terminology of diseases in traditional Chinese medicine was an important trial in terms of and the scientific modernisation of Chinese medicine. However, its practical approach to 'control Chinese medicine with Western medicine' drove anxiety in people about the independence of Chinese medicine. This case provides TCM standardization, terminology normalization, and the practice of integrating Chinese and Western medicine with an historical reference.

[民国时期“中医病名统一”考察]。
1933年,中央国家医药局启动了全国统一中医疾病术语的工程,命名为“中医疾病名称统一案”。本文调查了项目的过程和内容,参考了参与项目的著名医生的具体意见,分析了项目引发社会争议的角度,如中医的发展原则、当时的社会状况、中西医结合的原则和中医的科学现代化,总结了反对意见和背后的因素。研究发现:中西医体系的根本差异、中央国家卫生局的权力局限、中西医结合认识不成熟。统一中医疾病术语是中医科学现代化的一项重要尝试。然而,其“以西医治中医”的实际做法,却引发了人们对中医独立性的担忧。本案例为中医规范化、术语规范化、中西医结合实践提供了历史借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华医史杂志
中华医史杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2145
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Medical History is the only professional academic journal on medical history in the country. The first publication was named "Journal of Medical History" and was designated as a quarterly publication. In 2009, it was changed from quarterly to bimonthly. The Chinese Journal of Medical History has columns such as special articles, reviews, expert talks, medical history treatises, literature research, forums and debates, historical accounts, figures, short essays, graduate forums, lectures, historical materials, medical history, and book reviews. Chinese Journal of Medical History has been included in the US Medline online database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书