Clinical transportability, calibration drift, and local updating of a B-mode ultrasound radiomics-clinical prediction model for occult high-volume central lymph node metastasis in cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: development, temporal validation, and external validation.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2026-07-31 Epub Date: 2026-07-24 DOI:10.21037/gs-2026-0217
Ziwei Zhang, Cailing Lin, Jing Ning, Xiaochen Liu, Chenshan Dong, Hang Ling
{"title":"Clinical transportability, calibration drift, and local updating of a B-mode ultrasound radiomics-clinical prediction model for occult high-volume central lymph node metastasis in cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: development, temporal validation, and external validation.","authors":"Ziwei Zhang, Cailing Lin, Jing Ning, Xiaochen Liu, Chenshan Dong, Hang Ling","doi":"10.21037/gs-2026-0217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occult high-volume central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) can remain undetected in clinically node-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma (cN0 PTC), yet nodal burden influences preoperative counseling and recurrence-oriented risk stratification. For clinical implementation, a preoperative radiomics-based risk estimate must remain transportable, locally calibrated, and interpretable after transfer to another center. This study evaluated the clinical transportability, calibration drift, threshold consequences, and local updating of a B-mode ultrasound radiomics-clinical prediction model for occult high-volume CLNM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This three-center retrospective model-development, validation, and updating study used the source workbook containing 957 cN0 PTC patients. The endpoint was occult high-volume CLNM, defined as more than five metastatic central lymph nodes on postoperative pathology. Candidate predictors were restricted to preoperative clinical-ultrasound variables and a prespecified B-mode radiomics score. Clinical-only, B-mode score-only, and clinical plus B-mode score models were compared in the development cohort; the clinical plus B-mode score model was treated as the locked primary implementation model because it preserved routine clinical interpretability while incorporating the quantitative image signal. The locked model was evaluated in a temporal Center 1 cohort (n=210), Center 2 (n=139), and Center 3 (n=119). Discrimination, Brier score, calibration, fixed-threshold classification, decision curve analysis, threshold consequences, and post hoc intercept-only recalibration were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High-volume CLNM was present in 399 of 957 patients (41.7%). Event rates were 44.8%, 45.2%, 41.0%, and 23.5% in the development, temporal validation, Center 2, and Center 3 cohorts. Development-cohort comparisons showed larger tumors, higher B-mode radiomics scores, higher Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS) subclass, and richer vascularity among endpoint-positive patients. The B-mode score accounted for most discrimination. Compared with the B-mode score-only model, adding clinical-ultrasound variables changed the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) by +0.015 in development, +0.008 in temporal validation, -0.009 in Center 2, and -0.029 in Center 3. The locked clinical plus B-mode score model had AUC values of 0.823, 0.874, 0.866, and 0.870, respectively. Mean predicted risk aligned with observed risk in the development, temporal validation, and Center 2 cohorts but overestimated risk in Center 3 (36.4% predicted <i>vs.</i> 23.5% observed; calibration intercept, -0.902). At the locked threshold of 0.565, Center 3 retained specificity of 0.857 and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.897, while intercept-only updating reduced the Center 3 Brier score from 0.138 to 0.121.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The locked radiomics-clinical model provided an interpretable preoperative risk-stratification framework whose deployment value depends on local calibration and threshold consequences. External deployment should evaluate spectrum shift, positive predictive value (PPV) and NPV, calibration, decision curves, and local updating rather than relying on AUC alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"15 7","pages":"195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13462856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2026-0217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Occult high-volume central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) can remain undetected in clinically node-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma (cN0 PTC), yet nodal burden influences preoperative counseling and recurrence-oriented risk stratification. For clinical implementation, a preoperative radiomics-based risk estimate must remain transportable, locally calibrated, and interpretable after transfer to another center. This study evaluated the clinical transportability, calibration drift, threshold consequences, and local updating of a B-mode ultrasound radiomics-clinical prediction model for occult high-volume CLNM.

Methods: This three-center retrospective model-development, validation, and updating study used the source workbook containing 957 cN0 PTC patients. The endpoint was occult high-volume CLNM, defined as more than five metastatic central lymph nodes on postoperative pathology. Candidate predictors were restricted to preoperative clinical-ultrasound variables and a prespecified B-mode radiomics score. Clinical-only, B-mode score-only, and clinical plus B-mode score models were compared in the development cohort; the clinical plus B-mode score model was treated as the locked primary implementation model because it preserved routine clinical interpretability while incorporating the quantitative image signal. The locked model was evaluated in a temporal Center 1 cohort (n=210), Center 2 (n=139), and Center 3 (n=119). Discrimination, Brier score, calibration, fixed-threshold classification, decision curve analysis, threshold consequences, and post hoc intercept-only recalibration were assessed.

Results: High-volume CLNM was present in 399 of 957 patients (41.7%). Event rates were 44.8%, 45.2%, 41.0%, and 23.5% in the development, temporal validation, Center 2, and Center 3 cohorts. Development-cohort comparisons showed larger tumors, higher B-mode radiomics scores, higher Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS) subclass, and richer vascularity among endpoint-positive patients. The B-mode score accounted for most discrimination. Compared with the B-mode score-only model, adding clinical-ultrasound variables changed the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) by +0.015 in development, +0.008 in temporal validation, -0.009 in Center 2, and -0.029 in Center 3. The locked clinical plus B-mode score model had AUC values of 0.823, 0.874, 0.866, and 0.870, respectively. Mean predicted risk aligned with observed risk in the development, temporal validation, and Center 2 cohorts but overestimated risk in Center 3 (36.4% predicted vs. 23.5% observed; calibration intercept, -0.902). At the locked threshold of 0.565, Center 3 retained specificity of 0.857 and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.897, while intercept-only updating reduced the Center 3 Brier score from 0.138 to 0.121.

Conclusions: The locked radiomics-clinical model provided an interpretable preoperative risk-stratification framework whose deployment value depends on local calibration and threshold consequences. External deployment should evaluate spectrum shift, positive predictive value (PPV) and NPV, calibration, decision curves, and local updating rather than relying on AUC alone.

cN0乳头状甲状腺癌隐匿大容量中央淋巴结转移的b超放射学-临床预测模型的临床可移植性、校准漂移和局部更新:发展、时间验证和外部验证。
背景:隐匿的大体积中央淋巴结转移(CLNM)在临床淋巴结阴性的甲状腺乳头状癌(cN0 PTC)中可能未被发现,但淋巴结负担影响术前咨询和复发导向的风险分层。对于临床实施,术前基于放射学的风险评估必须在转移到另一个中心后保持可移植性、本地校准性和可解释性。本研究评估了隐匿性大体积CLNM的b超放射学-临床预测模型的临床可移植性、校准漂移、阈值后果和局部更新。方法:这项三中心回顾性模型开发、验证和更新研究使用了957例cN0 PTC患者的源工作簿。终点是隐匿性大体积CLNM,术后病理定义为超过5个转移性中央淋巴结。候选预测因子仅限于术前临床超声变量和预先指定的b型放射组学评分。在发展队列中比较仅临床、仅b模式评分和临床加b模式评分模型;临床+ b模式评分模型被视为锁定的主要实施模型,因为它保留了常规的临床可解释性,同时结合了定量的图像信号。锁定模型在Center 1 (n=210)、Center 2 (n=139)和Center 3 (n=119)的时间队列中进行评估。评估了辨别力、Brier评分、校准、固定阈值分类、决策曲线分析、阈值后果和事后仅截距重新校准。结果:957例患者中有399例(41.7%)出现高体积CLNM。在发展、时间验证、中心2和中心3队列中,事件发生率分别为44.8%、45.2%、41.0%和23.5%。发展队列比较显示,终点阳性患者的肿瘤更大,b型放射组学评分更高,中国甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统(C-TIRADS)亚类更高,血管更丰富。b模式分数占了大多数歧视。与仅b模式评分模型相比,加入临床超声变量使受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)在发展阶段改变+0.015,在时间验证阶段改变+0.008,在中心2阶段改变-0.009,在中心3阶段改变-0.029。锁定临床+ b模式评分模型AUC值分别为0.823、0.874、0.866、0.870。在发展、时间验证和中心2队列中,平均预测风险与观察到的风险一致,但在中心3队列中高估了风险(预测36.4% vs观察23.5%;校准截距,-0.902)。在锁定阈值为0.565时,Center 3的特异性为0.857,阴性预测值(NPV)为0.897,而仅拦截更新将Center 3 Brier评分从0.138降至0.121。结论:锁定放射组学-临床模型提供了一个可解释的术前风险分层框架,其部署值取决于局部校准和阈值结果。外部部署应评估频谱移位、正预测值(PPV)和净现值(NPV)、校准、决策曲线和本地更新,而不是仅仅依赖AUC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书